A Phase I Dose Escalation Study with Anti-CD44v6 Bivatuzumab Mertansine in Patients with Incurable Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck or Esophagus

Purpose: To assess safety, pharmacokinetics, maximum tolerated dose, and preliminary efficacy of bivatuzumab mertansine. Bivatuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against CD44v6, which previously seemed to be safe in phase I radioimmunotherapy trials, whereas the conjugated mertansine is a potent maytansine derivative. Experimental Design: Patients with incurable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck or esophagus were eligible. Bivatuzumab was given weekly for 3 consecutive weeks by i.v. infusion. One patient was planned to be treated at each dose tier as long as toxicity did not reach grade 2; otherwise, three patients had to be treated until dose-limiting toxicity occurred. Starting dose was 20 mg/m2 and dose was subsequently escalated in steps of 20 mg/m2. Patients without disease progression and not experiencing dose-limiting toxicity were eligible for repeated courses. Blood serum samples were taken throughout the treatment period to determine the pharmacokinetic properties of bivatuzumab mertansine and to assess the human anti–bivatuzumab mertansine antibody response. Results: Seven patients received a total of 23 weekly doses of bivatuzumab mertansine. One patient at the 100 mg/m2 and one at the 120 mg/m2 level experienced stable disease during treatment phase but also developed grade 1 skin toxicity (desquamation). One of them received a second treatment course. At the highest dose level achieved in this study (140 mg/m2), one patient developed toxic epidermal necrolysis after two infusions and died. Massive apoptosis of skin keratinocytes had occurred, whereas only symptomatic therapy for skin toxicity was available. The risk-benefit assessment of all patients treated in the total phase I program (4 clinical trials, 70 patients) turned out to be negative after consideration of this case of a toxic epidermal necrolysis and the skin-related adverse events observed in the other trials. Therefore, development of the conjugate was discontinued. Interindividual variability in pharmacokinetic variables was low and exposure to BIWI 1 increased proportionally with dose. No anti–bivatuzumab mertansine reactions were observed. Conclusion: The main toxicity of bivatuzumab mertansine was directed against the skin, most probably due to CD44v6 expression in this tissue. The majority of skin reactions was reversible; however, one fatal drug-related adverse event had occurred. Clinical development was discontinued before reaching maximum tolerated dose.

[1]  H. Koeppen,et al.  Identification and immunotherapeutic targeting of antigens induced by chemotherapy , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[2]  P. Hutchinson,et al.  Toxic epidermal necrolysis: current evidence, practical management and future directions , 2005, The British journal of dermatology.

[3]  R. Schilsky,et al.  A Phase I Study of Cantuzumab Mertansine Administered as a Single Intravenous Infusion Once Weekly in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[4]  W. Oyen,et al.  Phase I therapy study with (186)Re-labeled humanized monoclonal antibody BIWA 4 (bivatuzumab) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. , 2003, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[5]  A. Tolcher,et al.  Cantuzumab mertansine, a maytansinoid immunoconjugate directed to the CanAg antigen: a phase I, pharmacokinetic, and biologic correlative study. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  G. Snow,et al.  Reinfusion of unprocessed, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-stimulated whole blood allows dose escalation of 186Relabeled chimeric monoclonal antibody U36 radioimmunotherapy in a phase I dose escalation study. , 2002, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[7]  H. Oppelaar,et al.  Comparison of aluminium (III) phthalocyanine tetrasulfonate‐ and meta‐tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin‐monoclonal antibody conjugates for their efficacy in photodynamic therapy in vitro , 2002, International journal of cancer.

[8]  Jacques Ferlay,et al.  Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000 , 2001, International journal of cancer.

[9]  M. Christian,et al.  [New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors]. , 2000, Bulletin du cancer.

[10]  G. Snow,et al.  Phase I therapy study of 186Re-labeled chimeric monoclonal antibody U36 in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  G. Snow,et al.  Safety and biodistribution of 99mTechnetium-labeled anti-CD44v6 monoclonal antibody BIWA 1 in head and neck cancer patients. , 2000, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[12]  R. Phillips AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics , 2000, Expert opinion on investigational drugs.

[13]  N. Lawrence,et al.  Tubulin as a target for anticancer drugs: Agents which interact with the mitotic spindle , 1998, Medicinal research reviews.

[14]  R. Chari,et al.  The development of antibody delivery systems to target cancer with highly potent maytansinoids. , 1997, Expert opinion on investigational drugs.

[15]  K. Heider,et al.  Characterization of a high-affinity monoclonal antibody specific for CD44v6 as candidate for immunotherapy of squamous cell carcinomas , 1996, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.

[16]  K. Heider,et al.  Splice variants of the cell surface glycoprotein CD44 associated with metastatic tumour cells are expressed in normal tissues of humans and cynomolgus monkeys. , 1995, European journal of cancer.

[17]  R. Brakenhoff,et al.  The human E48 antigen, highly homologous to the murine Ly-6 antigen ThB, is a GPI-anchored molecule apparently involved in keratinocyte cell-cell adhesion , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  G. Snow,et al.  MAb U36, a novel monoclonal antibody successful in immunotargeting of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. , 1993, Cancer research.

[19]  S. Takayama,et al.  Analyses of distant metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and lesions above the clavicle at autopsy. , 1993, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[20]  S. Shah,et al.  Immunoconjugates containing novel maytansinoids: promising anticancer drugs. , 1992, Cancer research.

[21]  S. Taylor Head and neck cancer. , 1991, Cancer chemotherapy and biological response modifiers.

[22]  W. Lehmann,et al.  Frequency and sites of distant metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. An analysis of 101 cases at autopsy. , 1987, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[23]  B. Wessels,et al.  Radionuclide selection and model absorbed dose calculations for radiolabeled tumor associated antibodies. , 1984, Medical physics.

[24]  A. Meyers,et al.  Distant metastases in head and neck epidermoid carcinoma , 1980, The Laryngoscope.

[25]  J. Holland,et al.  Phase I study of weekly maytansine given by iv bolus or 24-hour infusion. , 1979, Cancer treatment reports.

[26]  J. Ingle,et al.  Phase II evaluation of maytansine in patients with metastatic lung cancer. , 1978, Cancer treatment reports.

[27]  R. Blum,et al.  Maytansine: a phase I study of an ansa macrolide with antitumor activity. , 1978, Cancer treatment reports.

[28]  J. Ingle,et al.  Early clinical study of an intermittent schedule for maytansine (NSC-153858): brief communication. , 1978, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[29]  D. DuBois,et al.  FIFTH PAPER THE MEASUREMENT OF THE SURFACE AREA OF MAN , 1915 .

[30]  U. G. Dailey Cancer,Facts and Figures about. , 2022, Journal of the National Medical Association.