Visuomotor Optimality and its Utility in Parametrization of Response

We present a method of characterizing visuomotor response by inferring subject-specific physiologically meaningful parameters within the framework of optimal control theory. The characterization of visuomotor response is of interest in the assessment of impairment and rehabilitation, the analysis of man--machine systems, and sensorimotor research. We model the visuomotor response as a linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) controller, a Bayesian optimal state estimator in series with a linear quadratic regulator. Subjects used a modified computer mouse to attempt to keep a displayed cursor at a fixed desired location despite a Gaussian random disturbance and simple cursor dynamics. Nearly all subjects' behavior was consistent with the hypothesized optimality. Experimental data were used to fit an LQG model whose assumptions are simple and consistent with other sensorimotor work. The parametrization is parsimonious and yields quantities of clear physiological meaning: noise intensity, level of exertion, delay, and noise bandwidth. Significant variations in response were observed, consistent with signal-dependent noise and changes in exerted effort. This is a novel example of the role of optimal control theory in explaining variance in human visuomotor response. We also present technical improvements on the use of LQG in human operator modeling.

[1]  Bruce A. Francis,et al.  Feedback Control Theory , 1992 .

[2]  Yongge Wei,et al.  Supporting Materials , 2019, The F-35 Lightning II: From Concept to Cockpit.

[3]  H. Inooka,et al.  Experimental studies of manual optimization in control tasks , 1990, IEEE Control Systems Magazine.

[4]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Making smooth moves , 2022 .

[5]  Ezra S. Krendel,et al.  Mathematical Models of Human Pilot Behavior , 1974 .

[6]  David L. Kleinman,et al.  A control theoretic approach to manned-vehicle systems analysis , 1971 .

[7]  Michael H. Kutner Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[8]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Computational principles of movement neuroscience , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[10]  A.D. Kuo,et al.  An optimal control model for analyzing human postural balance , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and head) , 1996 .

[12]  Francisco J Valero-Cuevas,et al.  Manipulating the edge of instability. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  D. Kleinman,et al.  Optimal stationary control of linear systems with control-dependent noise , 1969 .

[14]  J. He,et al.  Feedback gains for correcting small perturbations to standing posture , 1989, Proceedings of the 28th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control,.

[15]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  Pilot-Induced Oscillations and Human Dynamic Behavior , 1995 .

[16]  Robert F. Stengel,et al.  Optimal Control and Estimation , 1994 .

[17]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[18]  David L. Kleinman,et al.  An optimal control model of human response part I: Theory and validation , 1970 .

[19]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  R. McNeill Alexander,et al.  Principles of Animal Locomotion , 2002 .

[21]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  M. Vajta Some remarks on Padé-approximations , 2000 .

[23]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Review TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.7 July 2006 Special Issue: Probabilistic models of cognition Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control , 2022 .

[24]  H. Clamann Statistical analysis of motor unit firing patterns in a human skeletal muscle. , 1969, Biophysical journal.

[25]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  Human dynamics in man-machine systems , 1980, Autom..

[26]  Karl Johan Åström,et al.  PID Controllers: Theory, Design, and Tuning , 1995 .

[27]  Konrad Paul Körding,et al.  The loss function of sensorimotor learning. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Örjan Ekeberg,et al.  Precision grip force dynamics: a system identification approach , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[30]  J. Carr,et al.  Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. , 1985, Physical therapy.

[31]  R. Peterka Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Emanuel Todorov,et al.  Stochastic Optimal Control and Estimation Methods Adapted to the Noise Characteristics of the Sensorimotor System , 2005, Neural Computation.

[33]  E. Todorov Optimality principles in sensorimotor control , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  Bart De Moor,et al.  N4SID: Subspace algorithms for the identification of combined deterministic-stochastic systems , 1994, Autom..

[35]  W. D. Ray Applied Linear Statistical Models (3rd Edition) , 1991 .

[36]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Motor Control and Learning , 2006 .

[37]  John B. Davidson,et al.  Modified optimal control pilot model for computer-aided design and analysis , 1992 .