Pursuing design excellence: Urban design governance on Toronto's waterfront

This paper explores the governance of urban design on Toronto's waterfront. It examines the formation, mandate and powers of the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation (TWRC) – now branded Waterfront Toronto – and critically evaluates the urban design policies, tools and mechanisms that have been put in place to support waterfront redevelopment and pursue a goal of ‘design excellence’ since 1999. The paper traces the key decisions that led to the creation of the TWRC by the federal, provincial and municipal governments and details the ambitious planning and design vision that emerged for the waterfront, but also argues that the TWRC was awarded a limited institutional mandate to fulfil its aims and objectives. The latter sections of the paper describe how a series of design-sensitive tools and mechanisms were introduced alongside the statutory planning framework for the waterfront to counter the governance and financial challenges faced by the Corporation. The paper contends that the Corporation is currently overseeing a broadly positive redevelopment programme that has been able to deliver a high quality public realm on the waterfront and facilitate design-led real estate development. An innovative public engagement strategy has been coupled with neighbourhood ‘precinct’ planning and design peer review to achieve these outcomes. It is argued that these positive shifts have begun to counter the long history of faltering post-industrial development and ‘jurisdictional gridlock’ that has plagued Toronto's waterfront since the 1960s.

[1]  J. Harlan,et al.  Who's In Charge? , 1981 .

[2]  Darren Bell,et al.  The Emergence of Contemporary Masterplans: Property Markets and the Value of Urban Design , 2005 .

[3]  R. Varkki George,et al.  Fallacious argumentation in design review , 2002 .

[4]  G. Desfor.  Restructuring the Toronto Harbour Commission: land politics on the Toronto waterfront , 1993 .

[5]  J. Laidley.  Constructing a Foundation for Change: The Ecosystem Approach and the Global Imperative on Toronto’s Central Waterfront , 2005 .

[6]  Matthew Carmona,et al.  Stakeholder Views on Value and Urban Design , 2002 .

[7]  Cift.  Annual Report 2006-'07 , 2007 .

[8]  R. Oliver.  Toronto's Olympic Aspirations: A Bid for the Waterfront1 , 2011 .

[9]  R. Varkki George,et al.  A procedural explanation for contemporary urban design , 1997 .

[10]  B. Hopwood,et al.  From Evangelistic Bureaucrat to visionary developer: The changing character of the master plan in Britain , 2006 .

[11]  R. Keil,et al.  Reurbanization in Toronto: Condominium boom and social housing revitalization , 2010 .

[12]  Michael James Biddulph,et al.  Urban design, regeneration and the entrepreneurial city , 2011 .

[13]  D. Harvey,et al.  The Condition of Postmodernity. An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change (an excerpt) , 1991, Journal of Economic Sociology.

[14]  Russell Linden,et al.  From Vision to Reality , 1990 .

[15]  Ali Madanipour,et al.  Roles and Challenges of Urban Design , 2006 .

[16]  G. Desfor,et al.  8 Creating an Environment for Change: The ‘Ecosystem Approach’ and the Olympics on Toronto’s Waterfront , 2011 .

[17]  J. Laidley,et al.  Old Mega-Projects Newly Packaged? Waterfront Redevelopment in Toronto , 2008 .

[18]  Randolph T. Hester,et al.  Design for Ecological Democracy , 2006 .

[19]  Jonathan Barnett,et al.  Urban design as public policy : practical methods for improving cities , 1974 .

[20]  P. Filion,et al.  The Impact of Organizational Crafting on Planning , 2011 .

[21]  John Punter,et al.  The Design Dimension of Planning: Theory, content and best practice for design policies , 2013 .

[22]  John J. Costonis.  Icons and Aliens: Law, Aesthetics, and Environmental Change , 1991 .

[23]  John Punter,et al.  Developing Urban Design as Public Policy: Best Practice Principles for Design Review and Development Management , 2007 .

[24]  Lynne B. Sagalyn,et al.  Value Creation Through Urban Design , 2011 .

[25]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[26]  Steve Tiesdell,et al.  Real Estate Development, Urban Design and the Tools Approach to Public Policy , 2011 .

[27]  D. Harvey.  Spaces of Hope , 2000 .

[28]  P. Newman,et al.  Cities as sustainable ecosystems : principles and practices , 2008 .

[29]  James T. White.  Design by Competition and the Potential for Public Participation: Assessing an Urban Design Competition on Toronto’s Waterfront , 2014 .

[30]  Paul L. Knox,et al.  Cities and Design , 2010 .

[31]  Marilyn Higgins,et al.  How Planning Authorities Can Improve Quality through the Design Review Process: Lessons from Edinburgh , 2009 .

[32]  G. Desfor,et al.  A POLITICAL ECONOMY OF THE WATER-FRONTIER : PLANNING DEVELOPMENT IN TORONTO , 1989 .

[33]  Matthew Carmona,et al.  Design Coding and the Creative, Market and Regulatory Tyrannies of Practice , 2009 .

[34]  Brenda Case Scheer.  Introduction: The Debate on Design Review , 1994 .

[35]  John Punter,et al.  From Design Advice to Peer Review: The Role of the Urban Design Panel in Vancouver , 2003 .

[36]  Timothy Beatley,et al.  Native to Nowhere: Sustaining Home And Community In A Global Age , 2004 .

[37]  Susannah Bunce,et al.  12 Public-Private Sector Alliances in Sustainable Waterfront Revitalization: Policy, Planning, and Design in the West Don Lands , 2011 .

[38]  J. Grant.  Planning the Good Community: New Urbanism in Theory and Practice , 2005 .

[39]  Steve Tiesdell,et al.  The Part and the Whole: Implementing Masterplans in Glasgow's New Gorbals , 2007 .

[40]  J. Jacobs.  The Death and Life of Great American Cities , 1962 .

[41]  Kim Dovey,et al.  Pleasure, Politics, and the “Public Interest”: Melbourne's Riverscape Revitalization , 2002 .

[42]  John Punter.  Design-led Regeneration? Evaluating the Design Outcomes of Cardiff Bay and their Implications for Future Regeneration and Design , 2007 .

[43]  A. C. Hall.  Design Control: Towards a New Approach , 1996 .

[44]  D. Gordon.  Planning, design and managing change in urban waterfront redevelopment , 1996 .

[45]  S. Bond,et al.  Public Participation and New Urbanism: A Conflicting Agenda? , 2007 .

[46]  John Punter,et al.  Urban design in central Sydney 1945–2002: Laissez-Faire and discretionary traditions in the accidental city , 2005 .

[47]  James T. White.  Future Directions in Urban Design as Public Policy: Reassessing Best Practice Principles for Design Review and Development Management , 2015 .

[48]  Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris,et al.  Urban Design Downtown: Poetics and Politics of Form , 1998 .

[49]  P. Healey.  Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies , 1997 .

[50]  Jan Gehl,et al.  Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space , 2003 .

[51]  Heather A. Smith.  Planning, policy and polarisation in Vancouver's downtown eastside , 2003 .

[52]  R. Keil,et al.  Toronto Inc? Planning the Competitive City in the New Toronto , 2002 .

[53]  Richard Tseng-yu Lai,et al.  Law in urban design and planning: The invisible web , 1988 .

[54]  Beth Moore Milroy.  Thinking Planning and Urbanism , 2009 .

[55]  Elizabeth Macdonald,et al.  Street-facing Dwelling Units and Livability: The Impacts of Emerging Building Types in Vancouver's New High-density Residential Neighbourhoods , 2005 .

[56]  G. Desfor,et al.  A political economy of the waterfrontier: Planning and development in Toronto , 1989 .

[57]  Aspa Gospodini,et al.  European Cities in Competition and the New ' Uses ' of Urban Design , 2002 .

[58]  Wolfgang F. E. Preiser,et al.  Design Review: Challenging Urban Aesthetic Control , 1998 .

[59]  Guy Julier.  Urban Designscapes and the Production of Aesthetic Consent , 2005, Culture-Led Urban Regeneration.

[60]  Jack L. Nasar,et al.  Design Review Reviewed , 1999 .

[61]  Matthew Carmona,et al.  The Place-shaping Continuum: A Theory of Urban Design Process , 2014 .

[62]  J. Sewell.  The Shape of the City: Toronto Struggles with Modern Planning , 1993 .

[63]  J. Friedmann.  Retracking America;: A theory of transactive planning , 1973 .

[64]  Mike Biddulph.  J. V. Punter, "Design Guidelines in American Cities: A Review of Design Policies and Guidance in Five West Coast Cities" (Book Review) , 1999 .

[65]  Dikmen Bezmez.  The Politics of Urban Waterfront Regeneration: The Case of Haliç (the Golden Horn), Istanbul , 2008 .

[66]  John Punter,et al.  The Vancouver Achievement: Urban Planning and Design , 2003 .

[67]  John Punter.  Design guidelines in American cities : a review of design policies and guidance in five West Coast cities , 1999 .

[68]  Gene Desfor,et al.  2 Establishing the Toronto Harbour Commission and Its 1912 Waterfront Development Plan , 2011 .