Gossip spread in social network models

Gossip almost inevitably arises in real social networks. In this article we investigate the relationship between the number of friends of a person and limits on how far gossip about that person can spread in the network. How far gossip travels in a network depends on two sets of factors: (a) factors determining gossip transmission from one person to the next and (b) factors determining network topology. For a simple model where gossip is spread among people who know the victim it is known that a standard scale-free network model produces a non-monotonic relationship between number of friends and expected relative spread of gossip, a pattern that is also observed in real networks (Lind et al., 2007). Here, we study gossip spread in two social network models (Toivonen et al., 2006; Vazquez, 2003) by exploring the parameter space of both models and fitting them to a real Facebook data set. Both models can produce the non-monotonic relationship of real networks more accurately than a standard scale-free model while also exhibiting more realistic variability in gossip spread. Of the two models, the one given in Vazquez (2003) best captures both the expected values and variability of gossip spread.

[1]  Kathleen D. Vohs,et al.  Gossip as Cultural Learning , 2004 .

[2]  H. Herrmann,et al.  New approaches to model and study social networks , 2007, physics/0701107.

[3]  Minna Lyons,et al.  Malicious mouths? The Dark Triad and motivations for gossip , 2015 .

[4]  Roozbeh Daneshvar,et al.  The effect of gossip on social networks , 2011, Complex..

[5]  R. L. Rosnow.  Rumor and gossip in interpersonal interaction and beyond: A social exchange perspective. , 2001 .

[6]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[7]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[8]  M E J Newman.  Assortative mixing in networks. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[9]  S. Coyne,et al.  An Integrated Review of Indirect, Relational, and Social Aggression , 2005, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[10]  A. Vázquez.  Growing network with local rules: preferential attachment, clustering hierarchy, and degree correlations. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  Maria Deijfen,et al.  Growing networks with preferential deletion and addition of edges , 2009 .

[12]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  A comparative study of social network models: Network evolution models and nodal attribute models , 2008, Soc. Networks.

[13]  Travis J. Grosser,et al.  A Social Network Analysis of Positive and Negative Gossip in Organizational Life , 2010 .

[14]  Robin I. M. Dunbar.  Gossip in Evolutionary Perspective , 2004 .

[15]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  On the evolution of user interaction in Facebook , 2009, WOSN '09.

[16]  K. Kaski,et al.  A Model For Social Networks , 2006, physics/0601114.

[17]  M Girvan,et al.  Structure of growing social networks. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  Agata Fronczak,et al.  Mean-field theory for clustering coefficients in Barabási-Albert networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[20]  Lev Muchnik,et al.  Identifying influential spreaders in complex networks , 2010, 1001.5285.

[21]  Hans J Herrmann,et al.  Spreading gossip in social networks. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  K. Lagerspetz,et al.  Do Girls Manipulate and Boys Fight? Developmental Trends in Regard to Direct and Indirect Aggression , 1992 .

[23]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[24]  Robb Willer,et al.  Gossip and Ostracism Promote Cooperation in Groups , 2014, Psychological science.