The effects of iterative reconstruction in CT on low-contrast liver lesion volumetry: a phantom study

Tumor volume measured from computed tomography images is considered a biomarker for disease progression or treatment response. The estimation of the tumor volume depends on the imaging system parameters selected, as well as lesion characteristics. In this study, we examined how different image reconstruction methods affect the measurement of lesions in an anthropomorphic liver phantom with a non-uniform background. Iterative statistics-based and model-based reconstructions, as well as filtered back-projection, were evaluated and compared in this study. Statistics-based and filtered back-projection yielded similar estimation performance, while model-based yielded higher precision but lower accuracy in the case of small lesions. Iterative reconstructions exhibited higher signal-to-noise ratio but slightly lower contrast of the lesion relative to the background. A better understanding of lesion volumetry performance as a function of acquisition parameters and lesion characteristics can lead to its incorporation as a routine sizing tool.

[1]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Information-Theoretic Approach for Analyzing Bias and Variance in Lung Nodule Size Estimation With CT: A Phantom Study , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  B. Berman,et al.  Volumetry of low-contrast liver lesions with CT: Investigation of estimation uncertainties in a phantom study. , 2016, Medical physics.

[3]  Kyle J Myers,et al.  Noncalcified lung nodules: volumetric assessment with thoracic CT. , 2009, Radiology.

[4]  Eric Clarkson.  Estimation receiver operating characteristic curve and ideal observers for combined detection/estimation tasks. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[5]  G. Ruxton.  The unequal variance t-test is an underused alternative to Student's t-test and the Mann–Whitney U test , 2006 .

[6]  K D Hopper,et al.  Body CT and oncologic imaging. , 2000, Radiology.

[7]  Vahid Yaghmai,et al.  Hepatic tumors: region-of-interest versus volumetric analysis for quantification of attenuation at CT. , 2012, Radiology.

[8]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[9]  Aya Kamaya,et al.  Classification of Hypervascular Liver Lesions Based on Hepatic Artery and Portal Vein Blood Supply Coefficients Calculated from Triphasic CT Scans , 2015, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[10]  Joshua D. Evans,et al.  Noise-resolution tradeoffs in x-ray CT imaging: a comparison of penalized alternating minimization and filtered backprojection algorithms. , 2011, Medical physics.

[11]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: System and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms. , 2012, Medical physics.

[12]  William P. Shuman,et al.  Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection in the same patient: 64 channel liver CT image quality and patient radiation dose , 2011, European Radiology.

[13]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[14]  J. Solomon,et al.  Comparison of low-contrast detectability between two CT reconstruction algorithms using voxel-based 3D printed textured phantoms. , 2016, Medical physics.

[15]  Binsheng Zhao,et al.  Comparison of 1D, 2D, and 3D nodule sizing methods by radiologists for spherical and complex nodules on thoracic CT phantom images. , 2014, Academic radiology.

[16]  J. Leipsic,et al.  State of the Art: Iterative CT Reconstruction Techniques. , 2015, Radiology.

[17]  Joon Koo Han,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR for small hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma and the concordance rate of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) , 2017, PloS one.

[18]  Kyle J Myers,et al.  Minimum detectable change in lung nodule volume in a phantom CT study. , 2013, Academic radiology.

[19]  Takeshi Yoshikawa,et al.  Hepatic CT perfusion measurements: a feasibility study for radiation dose reduction using new image reconstruction method. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[20]  P M Silverman,et al.  Optimal contrast enhancement of the liver using helical (spiral) CT: value of SmartPrep. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  Vahid Yaghmai,et al.  Assessment of liver tumor response to therapy: role of quantitative imaging. , 2013, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[22]  Ivan Zelinka,et al.  MIXED INTEGER-DISCRETE-CONTINUOUS OPTIMIZATION BY DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION Part 1: the optimization method , 2004 .

[23]  Lawrence H. Schwartz,et al.  Assessing the effect of CT slice interval on unidimensional, bidimensional and volumetric measurements of solid tumours , 2012, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

[24]  W. H. Pun,et al.  Statistical Decision Theory , 2014 .

[25]  Riccardo Lencioni,et al.  Modified RECIST (mRECIST) Assessment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2010, Seminars in liver disease.

[26]  William Pao,et al.  A Pilot Study of Volume Measurement as a Method of Tumor Response Evaluation to Aid Biomarker Development , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[27]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. , 2011, Radiology.

[28]  Dave J. Bekers,et al.  Tumor Volume as an Alternative Response Measurement for Imatinib Treated GIST Patients , 2012, PloS one.

[29]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[30]  Ali Gholamrezanezhad,et al.  The Need for Standardization of Musculoskeletal Practice Reporting: Learning From ACR BI-RADS, Liver Imaging-Reporting and Data System, and Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[31]  Claude B. Sirlin,et al.  LI‐RADS (Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System): Summary, discussion, and consensus of the LI‐RADS Management Working Group and future directions , 2015, Hepatology.

[32]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of an Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm for Low-Contrast Detectability with a Third-Generation Dual-Source Multidetector CT Scanner: Potential for Radiation Dose Reduction in a Multireader Study. , 2015, Radiology.

[33]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Radiation Dose Reduction in Abdominal Computed Tomography During the Late Hepatic Arterial Phase Using a Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm: How Low Can We Go? , 2012, Investigative radiology.

[34]  Ke Li,et al.  Statistical model based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in clinical CT systems: experimental assessment of noise performance. , 2014, Medical physics.