Void Avoidance Opportunistic Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks

Much attention has been focused lately on the Opportunistic Routing technique (OR) that can overcome the restrictions of the harsh underwater environment and the unique structures of the Underwater Sensor Networks (UWSNs). OR enhances the performance of the UWSNs in both packet delivery ratio and energy saving. In our work; we propose a new routing protocol; called Energy Efficient Depth-based Opportunistic Routing with Void Avoidance for UWSNs (EEDOR-VA), to address the void area problem. EEDOR-VA is a reactive OR protocol that uses a hop count discovery procedure to update the hop count of the intermediate nodes between the source and the destination to form forwarding sets. EEDOR-VA forwarding sets can be selected with less or greater depth than the packet holder (i.e., source or intermediate node). It efficiently prevents all void/trapped nodes from being part of the forwarding sets and data transmission procedure; thereby saving network resources and delivering data packets at the lowest possible cost. The results of our extensive simulation study indicate that the EEDOR-VA protocol outperforms other protocols in terms of packet delivery ratio and energy consumption.

[1]  David A. Maltz,et al.  Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 1994, Mobidata.

[2]  Seyed Mohammad Ghoreyshi,et al.  An inherently void avoidance routing protocol for Underwater Sensor Networks , 2015, 2015 International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS).

[3]  Mario Gerla,et al.  VAPR: Void-Aware Pressure Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[4]  Nauman Aslam,et al.  EEDOR: An Energy Efficient Depth-Based Opportunistic Routing Protocol for UWSNs , 2020, 2020 IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE).

[5]  Nadeem Javaid,et al.  Efficient Data Gathering in 3D Linear Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks Using Sink Mobility , 2016, Sensors.

[6]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Underwater sensor networks: applications, advances and challenges , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[7]  Jamil Y. Khan,et al.  Short-Range Underwater Acoustic Communication Networks , 2011 .

[8]  Guangjie Han,et al.  Geographic multipath routing based on geospatial division in duty-cycled underwater wireless sensor networks , 2016, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[9]  Mario Gerla,et al.  Pressure Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks , 2010, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[10]  Abraham Varughese,et al.  Design of a Node for an Underwater Sensor Network , 2014 .

[11]  Kyung-Joon Park,et al.  EDOVE: Energy and Depth Variance-Based Opportunistic Void Avoidance Scheme for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2017, Sensors.

[12]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Underwater acoustic communication channels: Propagation models and statistical characterization , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[13]  Simonetta Balsamo,et al.  Implementation of depth-based routing and its enhancement in AquaSim-Next Generation for underwater wireless sensor networks , 2018, Int. J. Commun. Syst..

[14]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Battery Lifetime Estimation and Optimization for Underwater Sensor Networks , 2004 .

[15]  Luiz Filipe M. Vieira,et al.  Performance and trade-offs of opportunistic routing in underwater networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[16]  Parul Garg,et al.  Parametric Comparative Analysis of Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks Routing Protocols , 2015 .

[17]  Robert J. Urick,et al.  Principles of underwater sound , 1975 .

[18]  G. Sahoo,et al.  A comprehensive survey of secure and energy efficient routing protocols and data collection approaches in wireless sensor networks , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication (ICSPC).

[19]  Nianmin Yao,et al.  WDFAD-DBR: Weighting depth and forwarding area division DBR routing protocol for UASNs , 2016, Ad Hoc Networks.

[20]  S. Singh,et al.  Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks - A Survey , 2010 .

[21]  Dario Pompili,et al.  Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges , 2005, Ad Hoc Networks.

[22]  Jun-Hong Cui,et al.  DBR: Depth-Based Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks , 2008, Networking.

[23]  Azzedine Boukerche,et al.  Design guidelines for opportunistic routing in underwater networks , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[24]  Imran Baig,et al.  A survey on routing techniques in underwater wireless sensor networks , 2011, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[25]  Ying Wang,et al.  Energy efficient cluster formulation protocols in clustered underwater acoustic sensor networks , 2014, 2014 7th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics.

[26]  Azzedine Boukerche,et al.  Geographic and Opportunistic Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[27]  Dario Pompili,et al.  Challenges for efficient communication in underwater acoustic sensor networks , 2004, SIGBED.

[28]  Seyed Mohammad Ghoreyshi,et al.  An Underwater Routing Protocol with Void Detection and Bypassing Capability , 2017, 2017 IEEE 31st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA).

[29]  M. Stojanovic,et al.  Underwater acoustic networks , 2000, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[30]  Antonio A. F. Loureiro,et al.  A novel opportunistic power controlled routing protocol for internet of underwater things , 2020, Comput. Commun..

[31]  Omprakash Kaiwartya,et al.  Next Forwarding Node Selection in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks (UWSNs): Techniques and Challenges , 2016, Inf..

[32]  Dejey,et al.  Void handling using Geo-Opportunistic Routing in underwater wireless sensor networks , 2017, Comput. Electr. Eng..