Techno-economic evaluation of commercial cogeneration plants for small and medium size companies in the Italian industrial and service sector

Abstract The liberalization of the electricity market and the concern for energy efficiency have resulted in a surge of interest in cogeneration and distributed power generation. In this regard, companies are encouraged to evaluate the opportunity to build their own cogeneration plant. In Italy, the majority of such companies belong to the industrial or service sector; it is small or medium in size and the electric power ranges between 1 ÷ 10 MW. Commercially available gas turbines are the less expensive option for cogeneration. Particular attention has been given to the possibility of combining an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) with gas turbine, to improve the conversion efficiency. Companies have to account for both technical and economical aspects to assess viability of cogeneration. A techno-economic analysis was performed to identify, in the Italian energy market, which users can take advantage of a cogeneration plant aimed to cover at least part of their energy demand. Since electricity and thermal needs change considerably in the same sector, single product categories have been considered in the analysis. Our work shows that in the industrial sector, independent of the product category, cogeneration is a viable option form a techno-economic perspective.

[1]  P. Fraser.  Distributed generation in liberalised electricity markets , 2003 .

[2]  Suneerat Pipatmanomai,et al.  Economic assessment of biogas-to-electricity generation system with H2S removal by activated carbon in small pig farm , 2009 .

[3]  Francesco Gullí,et al.  Small distributed generation versus centralised supply: a social cost-benefit analysis in the residential and service sectors , 2006 .

[4]  V. Badescu,et al.  Metamorphoses of cogeneration-based district heating in Romania: A case study , 2011 .

[5]  Paul Baudry,et al.  Energy supplier obligations and white certificate schemes: Comparative analysis of experiences in the European Union , 2010 .

[6]  Ronnie Belmans,et al.  Distributed generation: definition, benefits and issues , 2005 .

[7]  Eliseu Monteiro,et al.  Planning of micro-combined heat and power systems in the Portuguese scenario , 2009 .

[8]  Pedro J. Mago,et al.  Analysis and optimization of CCHP systems based on energy, economical, and environmental considerations , 2009 .

[9]  Luca Giaccone,et al.  Economical comparison of CHP systems for industrial user with large steam demand , 2009 .

[10]  Antonella Meneghetti,et al.  Optimisation models for decision support in the development of biomass-based industrial district-heating networks in Italy , 2005 .

[11]  Emmanuel Kakaras,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of the energy exploitation of biomass residues in Heraklion Prefecture—Crete , 2009 .

[12]  Ilias P. Tatsiopoulos,et al.  Comparative techno-economic analysis of ORC and gasification for bioenergy applications , 2009 .

[13]  M. D. Schicktanz,et al.  Primary energy and economic analysis of combined heating, cooling and power systems , 2011 .

[14]  James S. Wallace,et al.  Thermal Performance of a Combined Heat, Cooling, and Power Microturbine System , 2009 .

[15]  Pedro J. Mago,et al.  Evaluation of CCHP systems performance based on operational cost, primary energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emission by utilizing an optimal operation scheme , 2009 .

[16]  D. P. Papadopoulos,et al.  A general technoeconomic and environmental procedure for assessment of small-scale cogeneration scheme installations: Application to a local industry operating in Thrace, Greece, using microturbines , 2005 .

[17]  Siaw Kiang Chou,et al.  A thermoeconomic analysis of biomass energy for trigeneration , 2010 .

[18]  E. Izgi,et al.  Modelling of the change in national exchange rate model depending on the economic parameters of a natural gas cogeneration system: Turkey case , 2009 .

[19]  Lennart Söder,et al.  Distributed generation : a definition , 2001 .

[20]  Andreas Schuster,et al.  Energetic and economic investigation of Organic Rankine Cycle applications , 2009 .

[21]  Fabio Polonara,et al.  Distributed generation and trigeneration: energy saving opportunities in Italian supermarket sector , 2009 .

[22]  Mauro Reini,et al.  Optimal lay-out and operation of combined heat & power (CHP) distributed generation systems , 2009 .

[23]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  The Benefit of Regional Diversification of Cogeneration Investments in Europe: A Mean-Variance Portfolio Analysis , 2009 .

[24]  D. Papadopoulos,et al.  Biomass energy surveying and techno-economic assessment of suitable CHP system installations , 2002 .

[25]  Jing Tao,et al.  Economic, energy and environmental evaluations of biomass-based fuel ethanol projects based on life cycle assessment and simulation , 2009 .

[26]  Antonio Piacentino,et al.  Optimal design of CHCP plants in the civil sector by thermoeconomics , 2007 .

[27]  Taraneh Sowlati,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of wood biomass boilers for the greenhouse industry , 2009 .

[28]  J. R. San Cristóbal,et al.  Investment criteria for the selection of cogeneration plants¿a state of the art review , 2006 .