Unveiling the Value Creation Process of Electronic Human Resource Management

Information and communication technologies (ICT) advancement, coupled with an ever-increasing demand for the human resource management (HRM) function to be more efficient, effective, and capable of supporting the strategic goals of every business function, has led to the adoption of electronic human resource management (e-HRM). This study aims to provide both insight and empirical evidence on the success enabler of e-HRM acceptance and e-HRM value creation in the public sector. The study confirms that perceived usefulness (PU) is found to be a strong predictor of e-HRM usage. From an organizational and managerial standpoint, HRM strength has a positive influence on e-HRM usage. In the creation of HRM values, we find e-HRM usage to be a strong predictor of perceived human resource (HR) service quality but not a predictor of the creation of a strategic role for the HRM function. Furthermore, the study indicates that HRM strength is an important direct predictor of the creation of HRM values. Hence, this relationship suggests the importance of policy clarity and consistency. To ensure that e-HRM is used in a more strategic way, the core business functions of an organization, HRM strategy and IT management, should be clearly aligned and integrated. A set of theoretical and practical implications as well as the limitations of this research are also discussed.

[1]  Anne Beaudry,et al.  Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaption , 2005, MIS Q..

[2]  Emma Parry,et al.  Desired goals and actual outcomes of e‐HRM , 2011 .

[3]  Said S. Al-Gahtani,et al.  Attitudes, satisfaction and usage: Factors contributing to each in the acceptance of information technology , 1999, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[4]  Sandra L. Fisher,et al.  An evidence-based review of e-HRM and strategic human resource management , 2013 .

[5]  Cengiz Haksever,et al.  A Model of Value Creation: Strategic View , 2004 .

[6]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[7]  Sung Min Park,et al.  Work motivation and social communication among public managers , 2012 .

[8]  Huub J. M. Ruël,et al.  The strategic value of e-HRM: results from an exploratory study in a governmental organization , 2013 .

[9]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation , 1999, MIS Q..

[10]  Scott A. Snell,et al.  Virtual HR: Strategic human resource management in the 21st century , 1998 .

[11]  Léo F. C. Bruno,et al.  LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE BEYOND EXPECTATIONS , 2008 .

[12]  Raymond Caldwell Models of Change Agency: A Fourfold Classification , 2003 .

[13]  Emma Parry,et al.  An examination of e-HRM as a means to increase the value of the HR function , 2011 .

[14]  Huub J. M. Ruël,et al.  Electronic Human Resource Management: challenges in the digital era , 2009 .

[15]  Henri Barki,et al.  Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use , 1994 .

[16]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[17]  Sven Laumer,et al.  Analyzing the impact of HRIS implementations on HR personnel's job satisfaction and turnover intention , 2013, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Tatiana Bondarouk,et al.  Handbook of Research on E-transformation and Human Resources Management Technologies: Organizational Outcomes and Challenges , 2009 .

[19]  Bruce J. Avolio,et al.  The ethics of charismatic leadership: submission or liberation? , 1992 .

[20]  Eric W.T. Ngai,et al.  Human resource information systems: a review and empirical analysis , 2006 .

[21]  LimayemMoez,et al.  Measuring System Usage , 1995 .

[22]  Hubertus Johannes Maria Ruel,et al.  The contribution of e-HRM to HRM effectiveness. Results from a quantitative study in a Dutch Ministry. , 2007 .

[23]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[24]  Hal G. Gueutal,et al.  Human Resource Information Systems: Development and Application , 1990 .

[25]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  Technical and Strategic Human Resource Management Effectiveness as Determinants of Firm Performance , 1997 .

[26]  S. Foster Creating HR value through technology , 2010 .

[27]  Cataldo Ruta,et al.  The application of change management theory to HR portal implementation in subsidiaries of multinational corporations , 2005 .

[28]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Measuring System Usage: Implications for IS Theory Testing , 1995 .

[29]  Henri Barki,et al.  Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude , 1994, MIS Q..

[30]  Heikki Karjaluoto,et al.  Consumer acceptance of online banking: an extension of the technology acceptance model , 2004, Internet Res..

[31]  S. Foster Making Sense of e-HRM: Transformation, Technology and Power Relations , 2009 .

[32]  Scott A. Snell,et al.  Virtual HR Departments: Getting Out of the Middle , 2001 .

[33]  Gordon R. Foxall,et al.  Technology acceptance: a meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 1 , 2007 .

[34]  Huub Ruel,et al.  E-HRM Usage and Value Creation. Does a Facilitating Context Matter? , 2012 .

[35]  Sue Newell,et al.  A Knowledge-based View of Agenda-formation in the Development of Human Resource Information Systems , 2007 .

[36]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  Value creation in web services: An integrative model , 2006, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Jay A. Conger,et al.  Charismatic and transformational leadership in organizations: An insider's perspective on these developing streams of research , 1999 .

[38]  Montgomery Van Wart,et al.  Public-Sector Leadership Theory: An Assessment , 2003 .

[39]  Jeroen Delmotte,et al.  Toward an assessment of perceived HRM system strength: scale development and validation , 2012 .

[40]  Sung Min Park,et al.  Leadership and Public Service Motivation in U.S. Federal Agencies , 2008 .

[41]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[42]  Fred D. Davis User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[43]  Ellen A. Ensher,et al.  Tales from the Hiring Line: Effects of the Internet and Technology on HR Processes , 2002 .

[44]  David Ulrich,et al.  The HR Value Proposition , 2005 .

[45]  Shumaila Y. Yousafzai,et al.  Technology acceptance: a meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 2 , 2007 .

[46]  Stefan Strohmeier,et al.  Research in e-HRM: Review and implications , 2007 .

[47]  Bradford S. Bell,et al.  The impact of e-HR on professional competence in HRM: Implications for the development of HR professionals , 2006 .

[48]  D. Bowen,et al.  Understanding HRM–Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the “Strength” of the HRM System , 2004 .

[49]  Norma M. Riccucci,et al.  Public Personnel Management , 1992 .

[50]  S. Park Toward the Trusted Public Organization , 2012 .