PET Changes Management and Improves Prognostic Stratification in Patients with Recurrent Colorectal Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Prospective Study

The aims of our study were to examine the impact of PET in changing management in patients with proven or suspected colorectal cancer recurrence and to assess the impact of management change on disease-free survival. Methods: Symptomatic patients with a residual structural lesion suggestive of recurrent tumor (group A) or patients with pulmonary or hepatic metastases considered to be potentially resectable (group B) underwent PET scans. Pre-PET management plans were documented by referring clinicians unaware of the PET results, and follow-up to 12 mo was performed to determine actual management and clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 191 patients (118 men and 73 women; mean age, 66 y) were studied. PET detected additional sites of disease in 48.4% of patients in group A and in 43.9% of patients in group B. A change in planned management was documented in 65.6% of group A and in 49.0% of group B patients. These management plans were implemented in 96% of patients. Follow-up data in group A showed progressive disease in 60.5% of patients with additional lesions detected by PET, compared with conventional imaging, and in 36.2% of patients with no additional lesions detected by PET (P = 0.04). In group B, progressive disease was identified in 65.9% of patients with additional lesions detected by PET and in 39.2% of patients with no additional lesions detected by PET (P = 0.01). PET also provided valuable prognostic information on patients stratified into curative- or palliative-intent groups. Conclusion: These data demonstrate the significant impact of PET on management and outcomes in patients with suspected recurrent colorectal cancer.

[1]  M. Fulham,et al.  The role of whole-body positron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose in identifying operable colorectal cancer metastases to the liver. , 1996, Archives of surgery.

[2]  B. Nordlinger,et al.  Surgical resection of colorectal carcinoma metastases to the liver: A prognostic scoring system to improve case selection, based on 1568 patients , 1996, Cancer.

[3]  T. Fleming,et al.  Surgery for Recurrent Colon Cancer: Strategies for Identifying Resectable Recurrence and Success Rates after Resection , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[4]  S. Larson,et al.  Positron emission tomography imaging of colorectal cancer. , 1999, Seminars in oncology.

[5]  P. Dupont,et al.  Additional value of whole-body positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in recurrent colorectal cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  L H Blumgart,et al.  Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. , 1999, Annals of surgery.

[7]  S S Gambhir,et al.  A meta-analysis of the literature for whole-body FDG PET detection of recurrent colorectal cancer. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  A. Scott Current status of positron emission tomography in oncology , 2001, Internal medicine journal.

[9]  P. Valk,et al.  Impact of 18F-FDG PET on managing patients with colorectal cancer: the referring physician's perspective. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  W. Oyen,et al.  Value of positron emission tomography with [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with colorectal liver metastases: a prospective study. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  A. Hogg,et al.  The clinical impact of (18)F-FDG PET in patients with suspected or confirmed recurrence of colorectal cancer: a prospective study. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  A. Hogg,et al.  The Clinical Impact of 18F-FDG PET in Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Recurrence of Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Study , 2002 .

[13]  J. Tepper,et al.  Analysis of surgical salvage after failure of primary therapy in rectal cancer: results from Intergroup Study 0114. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  Heiko Schöder,et al.  PET/CT in oncology: integration into clinical management of lymphoma, melanoma, and gastrointestinal malignancies. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  B. Siegel,et al.  Five-Year Survival After Resection of Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal Cancer in Patients Screened by Positron Emission Tomography With F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[16]  S. Curley,et al.  OncoSurge: a strategy for improving resectability with curative intent in metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  W. Oyen,et al.  The impact of fluor‐18‐deoxyglucose‐positron emission tomography in the management of colorectal liver metastases , 2005, Cancer.

[18]  A. Zwinderman,et al.  Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis--meta-analysis. , 2005, Radiology.

[19]  R. Goldberg Intensive surveillance after stage II or III colorectal cancer: is it worth it? , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  J. Fleshman,et al.  Detection of recurrent and metastatic colorectal cancer: Comparison of positron emission tomography and computed tomography , 1997, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[21]  K. Hiroshima,et al.  Prediction of prognosis and surgical indications for pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[22]  Barry A Siegel,et al.  Impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and positron emission tomography (PET) alone on expected management of patients with cancer: initial results from the National Oncologic PET Registry. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  J Nucl Med , 2010 .

[24]  U. G. Dailey Cancer,Facts and Figures about. , 2022, Journal of the National Medical Association.