Mathematical Modelling by Help of Category Theory: Models and Relations between Them

The growing complexity of modern practical problems puts high demand on mathematical modelling. Given that various models can be used for modelling one physical phenomenon, the role of model comparison and model choice is becoming particularly important. Methods for model comparison and model choice typically used in practical applications nowadays are computation-based, and thus time consuming and computationally costly. Therefore, it is necessary to develop other approaches to working abstractly, i.e., without computations, with mathematical models. An abstract description of mathematical models can be achieved by the help of abstract mathematics, implying formalisation of models and relations between them. In this paper, a category theory-based approach to mathematical modelling is proposed. In this way, mathematical models are formalised in the language of categories, relations between the models are formally defined and several practically relevant properties are introduced on the level of categories. Finally, an illustrative example is presented, underlying how the category-theory based approach can be used in practice. Further, all constructions presented in this paper are also discussed from a modelling point of view by making explicit the link to concrete modelling scenarios.

[1]  Henrik Nilsson,et al.  Abstract modelling: towards a typed declarative language for the conceptual modelling phase , 2017, EOOLT.

[2]  David I. Spivak Ologs: A Categorical Framework for Knowledge Representation , 2011, PloS one.

[3]  Christopher J. Roy,et al.  Verification and Validation in Scientific Computing , 2010 .

[4]  S. Vassilyev Method of reduction and qualitative analysis of dynamic systems: I , 2006 .

[5]  Holger Keitel,et al.  Evaluation of coupled partial models in structural engineering using graph theory and sensitivity analysis , 2011 .

[6]  Guido Morgenthal,et al.  A Comparative Assessment of Aerodynamic Models for Buffeting and Flutter of Long-Span Bridges , 2017 .

[7]  K. Gürlebeck,et al.  Application of Holomorphic Functions in Two and Higher Dimensions , 2016 .

[8]  Kay Smarsly,et al.  An abstract approach towards modeling intelligent structural systems , 2018 .

[9]  Dominic R. Verity,et al.  ∞-Categories for the Working Mathematician , 2018 .

[10]  Stanislav N. Vassilyev,et al.  Intelligent control via new efficient logics , 2008 .

[11]  G. Morgenthal,et al.  A synergistic study of a CFD and semi-analytical models for aeroelastic analysis of bridges in turbulent wind conditions , 2018, Journal of Fluids and Structures.

[12]  H. Nilsson,et al.  Conceptual modelling: Towards detecting modelling errors in engineering applications , 2019, Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences.

[13]  G Morgenthal,et al.  A categorical perspective towards aerodynamic models for aeroelastic analyses of bridge decks , 2019, Royal Society Open Science.

[14]  Bernt Øksendal,et al.  Stochastic Partial Differential Equations: A Modeling, White Noise Functional Approach , 1996 .

[15]  Dirk Hofmann,et al.  Categorical approach to modelling and to coupling of models , 2017 .

[16]  René Schott,et al.  An Operator Calculus Approach for Multi-constrained Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2015, MobiHoc.

[17]  王东东,et al.  Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , 2004 .

[18]  Reinhard Pöschel,et al.  Dynamical Systems in Categories , 2017, Appl. Categorical Struct..

[19]  Alexander Katovsky,et al.  Category Theory , 2010, Arch. Formal Proofs.