A Study on the Evacuation Spacing of Undersea Tunnels in Different Ventilation Velocity Conditions

: Ventilation velocity conditions may affect the smoke diffusion and evacuation environment in a tunnel fire, which should be fully considered in evacuation spacing designs of undersea tunnels. This study focuses on reasonable evacuation spacing under various possible velocity conditions of an undersea tunnel, providing a design method reference for calculating safe evacuation spacing. Fire Dynamic Simulator and Pathfinder software were used for numerical simulations of a 50 MW fire and evacuation process in a full-scale undersea tunnel with traffic congestion. The simulation cases contained velocity modes from zero to satisfying the critical velocity and evacuation spacings from 30 m to 80 m. The calculated distributions of the available safe escape time indicated that a low ventilation velocity, such as 1.0 m/s, is beneficial to the downstream evacuation, but turning off mechanical ventilation increased risk near the fire source. The required safe escape time is shortened with a reduction in slide spacings, but the shortened rate slowed down after spacing was less than 60 m. In addition, the slow evacuating areas from 100 m to 300 m from the fire source independent of spacing are identified. Ultimately, the reasonable evacuation spacings of 60 m, 50 m, and 30 m, corresponding to three possible ventilation velocity modes of low, medium, and high, are proposed through the comparisons of the distributions of available safe escape time and required safe escape time.

[1]  Xiaoqing Hu Numerical study of the effects of ventilation velocity on peak heat release rate and the confinement velocity in large tunnel fires , 2021 .

[2]  Juncheng Jiang,et al.  Comparative study on ventilation and smoke extraction systems of different super-long river-crossing subway tunnels under fire scenarios , 2021, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology.

[3]  Da-jun Yuan,et al.  Evacuation Experiment Study in Up and Down Escape Staircase of Underground Road , 2021, Advances in Civil Engineering.

[4]  A. Król,et al.  Numerical investigation on fire accident and evacuation in a urban tunnel for different traffic conditions , 2021 .

[5]  P. van Hees,et al.  Critical longitudinal ventilation velocity for smoke control in a tunnel induced by two nearby fires of various distances: Experiments and a revisited model , 2020 .

[6]  Shiquan Zhang,et al.  Experimental study on vertical evacuation capacity of evacuation slide in road shield tunnel , 2020 .

[7]  Yanping Yuan,et al.  Numerical simulation of smoke stratification in tunnel fires under longitudinal velocities , 2020 .

[8]  Zheng Fang,et al.  Evacuation Simulation of the Yangtze River-crossing Highway-metro Integrated Tunnel on Sanyang Road in Wuhan , 2019, 2019 9th International Conference on Fire Science and Fire Protection Engineering (ICFSFPE).

[9]  Yong Xu,et al.  Simulation and Assessment of Fire Evacuation Modes for Long Underwater Vehicle Tunnels , 2018, Fire Technology.

[10]  Aixi Zhou,et al.  Evacuation experiments in vertical exit passages in an underwater road shield tunnel , 2018, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[11]  J. Ji,et al.  Effects of ambient pressure on transport characteristics of thermal-driven smoke flow in a tunnel , 2018 .

[12]  M. Hasegawa,et al.  Evacuation speed in full-scale darkened tunnel filled with smoke , 2017 .

[13]  Michael Beyer,et al.  On the problem of ventilation control in case of a tunnel fire event , 2017 .

[14]  Di Huang,et al.  Probabilistic model for safe evacuation under the effect of uncertain factors in fire , 2017 .

[15]  Sulc Jan,et al.  Model-based airflow controller design for fire ventilation in road tunnels , 2016 .

[16]  Wan Ki Chow,et al.  A study on ceiling jet characteristics in an inclined tunnel , 2015 .

[17]  Jonatan Gehandler,et al.  Limit-Based Fire Hazard Model for Evaluating Tunnel Life Safety , 2015 .

[18]  K. Y. Wong,et al.  Longitudinal ventilation for smoke control in a tilted tunnel by scale modeling , 2010 .

[19]  L H Hu,et al.  Modeling fire-induced smoke spread and carbon monoxide transportation in a long channel: Fire Dynamics Simulator comparisons with measured data. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[20]  A Haack,et al.  Current safety issues in traffic tunnels , 2002 .

[21]  K. L. Tay,et al.  Control of Ventilation Airflow for Tunnel Fire Safety , 2000 .

[22]  Shuai Liu Study on Tunnel Fire Smoke Control and Transverse Passageway Interval under Traffic Congestion , 2021 .

[23]  S. Frey,et al.  ASPECTS OF LONGITUDINAL AIRFLOW CONTROL IN ROAD TUNNELS , 2020 .

[24]  Xiuling Wang,et al.  Statistical analysis of fire accidents in Chinese highway tunnels 2000–2016 , 2019, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology.

[25]  DESIGN FIRE CHARACTERISTICS FOR ROAD TUNNELS , 2019 .

[26]  Yong Pan,et al.  Numerical Investigation on the Evacuation of Passengers in Metro Train Fire , 2018 .

[27]  Hao Chen,et al.  Intelligent Ventilation and Emergency Evacuation of Underwater Tunnel under fire Conditions , 2016 .

[28]  D. A. Purser,et al.  Assessment of Hazards to Occupants from Smoke, Toxic Gases, and Heat , 2016 .

[29]  Norman Rhodes,et al.  Road Tunnels: Operational Strategies for Emergency Ventilation , 2011 .

[30]  Enrique Alarcón Álvarez,et al.  Experiences on the specification of algorithms for fire and smoke control in road tunnels , 2010 .

[31]  A. Tewarson Generation of Heat and Chemical Compounds in Fires , 2002 .

[32]  Wan Ki Chow,et al.  CASE STUDY: VEHICLE FIRE IN A CROSS-HARBOUR TUNNEL IN HONG KONG , 2001 .

[33]  M. Abdelguerfi,et al.  Introduction 1.2 Parallel Database Systems 1.2.1 Computation Model 2 1.2 Parallel Database Systems Introduction Select * from Employee, Department Where (employee.dept_no @bullet Department.dept_no) and (employee.position = "manager") (a) Sql Request 1.2.2 Engineering Model , 2022 .

[34]  Didier Lacroix,et al.  FIRE AND SMOKE CONTROL IN ROAD TUNNELS. , 1998 .