Personality, Emotion, and Mood in Agent-Based Group Decision Making

Incorporating affective characteristics (such as personality, emotion, and mood) in an agent-based group decision-support system can help improve the negotiation process.

[1]  Carlos Ramos,et al.  AI in Power Systems and Energy Markets , 2011, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[2]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Reaching Agreements Through Argumentation: A Logical Model and Implementation , 1998, Artif. Intell..

[3]  Patrick Gebhard,et al.  ALMA: a layered model of affect , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[4]  José Neves,et al.  Using Personality Types to Support Argumentation , 2009, ArgMAS.

[5]  P. Costa,et al.  Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: happy and unhappy people. , 1980, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  A. Mehrabian.  Analysis of the Big‐five Personality Factors in Terms of the PAD Temperament Model , 1996 .

[7]  José Neves,et al.  Context Aware Emotional Model for Group Decision Making , 2011 .

[8]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  N. Frijda.  The laws of emotion. , 1988, The American psychologist.

[10]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  On making believable emotional agents believable , 1988 .

[11]  José Neves,et al.  Context-Aware Emotion-Based Model for Group Decision Making , 2010, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[12]  Pierce J. Howard,et al.  The BIG FIVE Quickstart: An Introduction to the Five-factor Model of Personality for Human Resource , 1995 .

[13]  R. Ryckman,et al.  Theories of personality , 1989 .

[14]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Do emotions help or hurt decision making?: A hedgefoxian perspective , 2007 .

[15]  Stephen Potter,et al.  I-Room: A Virtual Space for Intelligent Interaction , 2010, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[16]  S. Srivastava,et al.  The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. , 1999 .