What should a corporate website look like? The influence of Gestalt principles and visualisation in website design on the degree of acceptance and recommendation

Internet users decide within seconds, whether to elaborate on a website, or to go on to a new page. This calls for investigation of the factors influencing this decision. In two studies, we presented websites for 3 s and analysed the effect implementation of Gestalt principles (GPs) and visualisation of an interaction partner has on acceptance, recommendation of the site by the user, and social presence. Study 1 implemented a 3 (Gestalt principle of proximity: no, medium and strong implementation) × 3 (Gestalt principle of a common region: no, medium and strong implementation) – design and found more acceptance and recommendation with more GPs used. Study 2, using a 2 (GPs: implemented and not implemented) × 3 (visualisation: no, drawing and photograph) – design, showed more social presence with more realistic visualisation and more recommendation with higher social presence. Thus, GPs and realistic visualisation should be implemented in web design to intensify interaction with the user.

[1]  Dennis E. Egan,et al.  Handbook of Human Computer Interaction , 1988 .

[2]  W. Köhler.  Gestalt psychology , 1967 .

[3]  J. Wagner.  Mensch - Computer - Interaktion , 2002 .

[4]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Determinant elements of customer relationship management in e-business , 2005, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[5]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[6]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Experimental Tests of Normative Group Influence and Representation Effects in Computer-Mediated Communication: When Interacting Via Computers Differs from Interacting With Computers. , 2002 .

[7]  M. Wertheimer.  Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II , 1923 .

[8]  D D Kurylo,et al.  Time course of perceptual grouping , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Examining the Effect of Grouping Border Type on Visual Search Performance , 2007 .

[10]  Milena M. Head,et al.  Manipulating perceived social presence through the web interface and its impact on attitude towards online shopping , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  Xiaohui Liu,et al.  An Integrated Approach for Modeling Learning Patterns of Students in Web-Based Instruction: A Cognitive Style Perspective , 2008, TCHI.

[12]  Paul C. Quinn,et al.  Perceptual organization of complex visual configurations by young infants , 1997 .

[13]  Antonella De Angeli,et al.  Towards a theory of user judgment of aesthetics and user interface quality , 2008, TCHI.

[14]  Jeremiah Sullivan,et al.  What are the functions of corporate home pages , 1999 .

[15]  Roxana Moreno,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Multimedia Learning with Animated Pedagogical Agents , 2005 .

[16]  Jeff Wisniewsk.  Tune It Up, Don't Tear It Down : Website Redesigns , 2008 .

[17]  Gitte Lindgaard,et al.  Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[18]  P. Quinn,et al.  Perceptual Organization Based on Common Region in Infancy. , 2007, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[19]  Jyh-Rong Chou,et al.  A Gestalt-like perceptual measure for home page design using a fuzzy entropy approach , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[20]  Atsuo Murata,et al.  Relationships Among Display Features, Eye Movement Characteristics, and Reaction Time in Visual Search , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[21]  Huay Lit Woo,et al.  Designing multimedia learning environments using animated pedagogical agents: factors and issues , 2009, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[22]  Per F. V. Hasle,et al.  Persuasive Design , 2008, Handbook of Research on Computer Mediated Communication.

[23]  James C. Lester,et al.  The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents , 1997, CHI.

[24]  P. Quinn,et al.  Young infants readily use proximity to organize visual pattern information. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[25]  O. Reiser,et al.  Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[26]  N. Tractinsky,et al.  What is beautiful is usable , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[27]  Laurence S. Dooley,et al.  Gestalt theory in visual screen design: a new look at an old subject , 2002 .

[28]  Eun-Ju Lee.  Factors That Enhance Consumer Trust in Human-Computer Interaction: An Examination of Interface Factors and Moderating Influences , 2002 .

[29]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[30]  Thomas S. Tullis.  PREDICTING THE USABILITY OF ALPHANUMERIC DISPLAYS , 1984 .

[31]  Kevin Chen,et al.  Graphical User Interfaces , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[32]  Edward W. Miles,et al.  The persuasive effect of graphics in computer-mediated communication , 1991 .

[33]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Source Orientation in Human-Computer Interaction , 2000, Commun. Res..

[34]  R. Kimchi.  Perceptual organization and visual attention. , 2009, Progress in brain research.

[35]  Zheng Xiang,et al.  Assessing the Initial Step in the Persuasion Process: META Tags on Destination Marketing Websites , 2006, ENTER.

[36]  D. Fesenmaier,et al.  Persuasive Design of Destination Web Sites: An Analysis of First Impression , 2008 .

[37]  Mercedes M. Fisher,et al.  Gestalt Theory: A Foundation for Instructional Screen Design , 1999 .

[38]  R G McGee,et al.  A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words , 2011, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[39]  S. Palmer.  Common region: A new principle of perceptual grouping , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[40]  Jukka Saarinen,et al.  Visual Search for Grouped versus Ungrouped Icons in a Computer Interface , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[41]  G. Salomon.  Interaction of media, cognition and learning , 1979 .

[42]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Evaluating the consistency of immediate aesthetic perceptions of web pages , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[43]  Anja Naumann.  Review: Dagmar Unz (2000). Lernen mit Hypertext. Informationssuche und Navigation [Learning with Hypertext. Information Seeking and Navigation] , 2002 .

[44]  S. Palmer,et al.  Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[45]  P. Quinn,et al.  Infants’ sensitivity to uniform connectedness as a cue for perceptual organization , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[46]  P. Quinn,et al.  Learning Perceptual Organization in Infancy , 2005, Psychological science.

[47]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Using Virtual Peers to Guide Visual Attention During Learning , 2010, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[48]  David Wallace,et al.  The Effect of Knowledge Maps That Incorporate Gestalt Principles on Learning , 1998 .

[49]  Susan Roth,et al.  Visual literacy and the design of digital media , 1995, COMG.

[50]  Jeff Wisniewski.  The New Rules of Web Design , 2008 .

[51]  Rolf Nelson,et al.  When does grouping happen? , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[52]  Marketta Niemelä,et al.  Layout attributes and recall , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[53]  Avraham Shtub,et al.  Evaluating the Layout of Graphical User Interface Screens: Validation of a Numerical Computerized Model , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[54]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  Social presence in two- and three-dimensional videoconferencing , 2005 .

[55]  Melissa F Schulz,et al.  Time Course of Perceptual Grouping in User Interface Displays , 2004 .

[56]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[57]  I. Rock,et al.  The legacy of Gestalt psychology. , 1990, Scientific American.

[58]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? , 2001, Commun. Res..

[59]  Andy Cockburn,et al.  What do web users do? An empirical analysis of web use , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..