The characterization of socio-political instability, development and sustainability with Fisher information

In an effort to evaluate socio-political instability, we studied the relationship between dynamic order, socio-political upheavals and sustainability in nation states. Estimating the degree of dynamic order inherent in the socio-political regime of various countries throughout the world involved applying Fisher information theory to data from the Political Instability Task Force database. Fisher information is a key method in information theory and affords the ability to characterize the structure and dynamics of complex systems. The results of this work demonstrate that nation states bifurcate into two distinct regimes, which exhibit a negative correlation between dynamic order, as determined by Fisher information, and the prevalence of upheavals. Countries in the High Incidence of Upheavals regime with low dynamic order (i.e., low Fisher information) experienced sixteen times more upheavals than the countries in the Low Incidence of Upheavals regime with high dynamic order (i.e. high Fisher information). Most importantly, our analysis demonstrates that newly industrializing countries suffer from the most instability, which is manifested in low dynamic order thereby resulting in a high number of upheavals. These results suggest that developing countries endure a period of socio-political instability on their path to the developed world.

[1]  Ken Conca,et al.  Environment and Peacebuilding in War-torn Societies: Lessons from the UN Environment Programme's Experience with Postconflict Assessment , 2009 .

[2]  Roger D. Congleton Political Institutions and Pollution Control , 1992 .

[3]  Heriberto Cabezas,et al.  Detection and Assessment of Ecosystem Regime Shifts from Fisher Information , 2008 .

[4]  N. Mankiw,et al.  Principles of Economics , 1871 .

[5]  Michael Redclift,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND THE ENVIRONMENT , 1994 .

[6]  T. Panayotou Economic Growth and the Environment , 2000 .

[7]  Paweł Bożyk,et al.  Globalization and the Transformation of Foreign Economic Policy , 2006 .

[8]  Richard Culas,et al.  Deforestation and the environmental Kuznets curve: An institutional perspective , 2007 .

[9]  D. Jahn Environmental performance and policy regimes: Explaining variations in 18 OECD-countries , 1998 .

[10]  Lawrence L. Lapin Statistics: Meaning and Method , 1975 .

[11]  T. Bernauer,et al.  On the Political Determinants of Environmental Quality , 2004 .

[12]  Michael D. Hammig,et al.  Institutions and the Environmental Kuznets Curve for Deforestation: A Crosscountry Analysis for Latin America, Africa and Asia , 2001 .

[13]  Paul H. Nitze Freedom , growth , and the environment , 2000 .

[14]  Daniel C. Esty,et al.  State Failure Task Force Report: Phase II Findings , 1999 .

[15]  Robert T. Deacon,et al.  Deforestation and the Rule of Law in a Cross-Section of Countries , 1994 .

[16]  William E. Rees,et al.  Globalization, trade and migration: Undermining sustainability , 2006 .

[17]  T. Heckelei,et al.  Global Environmental Change , 2018, The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology.

[18]  Olav Slaymaker,et al.  Mutual vulnerability, mutual dependence , 2003 .

[19]  R. Kates,et al.  Long-term trends and a sustainability transition , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Sustainability Science , 2019, Critical Skills for Environmental Professionals.

[21]  J. Lubchenco Entering the Century of the Environment: A New Social Contract for Science , 1998 .

[22]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Functions of scenarios in transition processes , 2006 .

[23]  Heriberto Cabezas,et al.  Sustainability: ecological, social, economic, technological, and systems perspectives , 2003 .

[24]  Dal Didia Democracy, political instability and tropical deforestation , 1997 .

[25]  David Epstein,et al.  State Failure Task Force Report: Phase III , 2002 .

[26]  R. Gerlagh,et al.  Corruption, Democracy, and Environmental Policy , 2006 .

[27]  J. Svensson,et al.  Political instability, corruption and policy formation: the case of environmental policy , 2003 .

[28]  Alexandra Winkels,et al.  Migration, Remittances, Livelihood Trajectories, and Social Resilience , 2002, Ambio.

[29]  Liliana B. Andonova,et al.  2005 Environmental Sustainability Index Benchmarking National Environmental Stewardship Appendix A Methodology , 2005 .

[30]  Heriberto Cabezas,et al.  Regime changes in ecological systems: an information theory approach. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  T. Selden,et al.  Environmental Quality and Development: Is There a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions? , 1994 .

[32]  Maria Carmen Lemos,et al.  Managing Waters of the Paraíba do Sul River Basin, Brazil: a Case Study in Institutional Change and Social Learning , 2008 .

[33]  Heriberto Cabezas,et al.  Identification of regime shifts in time series using neighborhood statistics , 2008 .

[34]  Anastasios Xepapadeas,et al.  Some Empirical Indications of the Relationship Between Environmental Quality and Economic Development , 1998 .

[35]  A. Chimeli Optimal dynamics of environmental quality in economies in transition1 , 2003 .

[36]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment , 1995, Environment and Development Economics.

[37]  Stephen Knowles,et al.  Social Capital and National Environmental Performance: A Cross-Sectional Analysis , 2004 .

[38]  R. Goodland The Concept of Environmental Sustainability , 1995 .

[39]  Robert A. Gatenby,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis Using Fisher Information , 2006 .

[40]  R. Fisher,et al.  On the Mathematical Foundations of Theoretical Statistics , 1922 .