A Comprehensive Overview of CO2 Flow Behaviour in Deep Coal Seams

Although enhanced coal bed methane recovery (ECBM) and CO2 sequestration are effective approaches for achieving lower and safer CO2 levels in the atmosphere, the effectiveness of CO2 storage is greatly influenced by the flow ability of the injected CO2 through the coal seam. A precious understanding of CO2 flow behaviour is necessary due to various complexities generated in coal seams upon CO2 injection. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview on the CO2 flow behaviour in deep coal seams, specifically addressing the permeability alterations associated with different in situ conditions. The low permeability nature of natural coal seams has a significant impact on the CO2 sequestration process. One of the major causative factors for this low permeability nature is the high effective stresses applying on them, which reduces the pore space available for fluid movement with giving negative impact on the flow capability. Further, deep coal seams are often water saturated where, the moisture behave as barriers for fluid movement and thus reduce the seam permeability. Although the high temperatures existing at deep seams cause thermal expansion in the coal matrix, reducing their permeability, extremely high temperatures may create thermal cracks, resulting permeability enhancements. Deep coal seams preferable for CO2 sequestration generally are high-rank coal, as they have been subjected to greater pressure and temperature variations over a long period of time, which confirm the low permeability nature of such seams. The resulting extremely low CO2 permeability nature creates serious issues in large-scale CO2 sequestration/ECBM projects, as critically high injection pressures are required to achieve sufficient CO2 injection into the coal seam. The situation becomes worse when CO2 is injected into such coal seams, because CO2 movement in the coal seam creates a significant influence on the natural permeability of the seams through CO2 adsorption-induced swelling and hydrocarbon mobilisation. With regard to the temperature, the combined effects of the generation of thermal cracks, thermal expansion, adsorption behaviour alterations and the associated phase transition must be considered before coming to a final conclusion. A reduction in coal’s CO2 permeability with increasing CO2 pressure may occur due to swelling and slip-flow effects, both of which are influenced by the phase transition in CO2 from sub- to super-critical in deep seams. To date, many models have been proposed to simulate CO2 movement in coal considering various factors, including porosity, effective stress, and swelling/shrinkage. These models have been extremely useful to predict CO2 injectability into coal seams prior to field projects and have therefore assisted in implementing number of successful CO2 sequestration/ECBM projects.

[1]  Jian Zhao,et al.  Optimization of enhanced coal-bed methane recovery using numerical simulation , 2015 .

[2]  Gregory R. King,et al.  Comparative evaluation of vertical and horizontal drainage wells for the degasification of coal seams , 1988 .

[3]  M. Perera Influences of CO2 Injection into Deep Coal Seams: A Review , 2017 .

[4]  Pathegama Gamage Ranjith,et al.  Numerical modeling of Gondwana coal seams in India as coalbed methane reservoirs substituted for carbon dioxide sequestration , 2013 .

[5]  Sevket Durucan,et al.  Drawdown Induced Changes in Permeability of Coalbeds: A New Interpretation of the Reservoir Response to Primary Recovery , 2004 .

[6]  David Airey,et al.  Investigation of temperature effect on permeability of naturally fractured black coal for carbon dioxide movement: An experimental and numerical study , 2012 .

[7]  P. Ranjith,et al.  The effects of sub-critical and super-critical carbon dioxide adsorption-induced coal matrix swellin , 2011 .

[8]  Yong Liu,et al.  A new method of drilling long boreholes in low permeability coal by improving its permeability , 2010 .

[9]  X. Miao,et al.  Evaluation of stress-controlled coal swelling processes , 2010 .

[10]  Pejman Tahmasebi,et al.  Stochastic shale permeability matching: Three-dimensional characterization and modeling , 2016 .

[11]  P. Bujok,et al.  CO2 mineral sequestration mechanisms and capacity of saline aquifers of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin (Central Europe) - Modeling and experimental verification , 2011 .

[12]  Ian D. Palmer,et al.  How Permeability Depends on Stress and Pore Pressure in Coalbeds: A New Model , 1998 .

[13]  Pathegama Gamage Ranjith,et al.  A parametric study of coal mass and cap rock behaviour and carbon dioxide flow during and after carbon dioxide injection , 2013 .

[14]  P. Ranjith,et al.  A review of coal properties pertinent to carbon dioxide sequestration in coal seams: with special reference to Victorian brown coals , 2011 .

[15]  Sally M. Benson,et al.  Relative permeability and trapping of CO2 and water in sandstone rocks at reservoir conditions , 2012 .

[16]  W. H. Somerton,et al.  Effect of stress on permeability of coal , 1975 .

[17]  Wei-zhong Chen,et al.  Experimental investigation on the coupled effect of effective stress and gas slippage on the permeability of shale , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[18]  Duane H. Smith,et al.  Shrinkage and swelling of coal induced by desorption and sorption of fluids : Theoretical model and interpretation of a field project , 2009 .

[19]  Thomas Gentzis,et al.  Subsurface sequestration of carbon dioxide — an overview from an Alberta (Canada) perspective , 2000 .

[20]  S. Durucan,et al.  The effects of stress and fracturing on permeability of coal , 1986 .

[21]  S. Durucan,et al.  Improving the CO2 well injectivity and enhanced coalbed methane production performance in coal seams , 2009 .

[22]  Pejman Tahmasebi,et al.  Stochastic modeling of coal fracture network by direct use of micro-computed tomography images , 2017 .

[23]  R. Marc Bustin,et al.  Selective transport of CO2, CH4, and N2 in coals: insights from modeling of experimental gas adsorption data , 2004 .

[24]  Satya Harpalani,et al.  Impact of CO2 Injection on Flow Behavior of Coalbed Methane Reservoirs , 2010 .

[25]  P. Ranjith,et al.  Investigation of the influence of coal swelling on permeability characteristics using natural brown coal and reconstituted brown coal specimens , 2012 .

[26]  A. C. Bumb,et al.  Stress-Dependent Permeability and Porosity of Coal and Other Geologic Formations , 1988 .

[27]  Pejman Tahmasebi,et al.  Pore-scale simulation of flow of CO2 and brine in reconstructed and actual 3D rock cores , 2017 .

[28]  Roger Beckie,et al.  Flow of Coal-Bed Methane to a Gallery , 2000 .

[29]  David Airey,et al.  Sub- and super-critical carbon dioxide flow behavior in naturally fractured black coal: An experimental study , 2011 .

[30]  Pathegama Gamage Ranjith,et al.  Carbon dioxide sequestration effects on coal's hydro‐mechanical properties: a review , 2012 .

[31]  Neil Sherwood,et al.  The influence of petrological properties and burial history on coal seam methane reservoir characterisation, Sydney Basin, Australia , 2007 .

[32]  Sevket Durucan,et al.  Coalbed methane reservoir data and simulator parameter uncertainty modelling for CO2 storage performance assessment , 2007 .

[33]  Pathegama Gamage Ranjith,et al.  Deep coal seams as a greener energy source: a review , 2014 .

[34]  Pathegama Gamage Ranjith,et al.  Coal cleat permeability for gas movement under triaxial, non-zero lateral strain condition: A theoretical and experimental study , 2013 .

[35]  P. Ranjith,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Reconstituted Australian Black Coal , 2009 .

[36]  P. K. Pal,et al.  Estimation of stress magnitude and physical properties for coal seam of Rangamati area, Raniganj coalfield, India , 2010 .

[37]  P. Ranjith,et al.  Geochemical aspects of CO2 sequestration in deep saline aquifers: A review , 2015 .

[38]  S. Sommacal,et al.  A fresh approach to investigating CO2 storage: Experimental CO2-water-rock interactions in a low-salinity reservoir system , 2015 .

[39]  Pathegama Gamage Ranjith,et al.  CO2 permeability of Indian bituminous coals: Implications for carbon sequestration , 2013 .

[40]  R. M. Bustin,et al.  Measurements of gas permeability and diffusivity of tight reservoir rocks: different approaches and their applications , 2009 .

[41]  David Airey,et al.  Numerical simulation of gas flow through porous sandstone and its experimental validation , 2011 .

[42]  Philip L. Walker,et al.  Nature of the porosity in American coals , 1972 .

[43]  John C. Slattery,et al.  Three‐dimensional, randomized, network model for two‐phase flow through porous media , 1982 .

[44]  Fu Yang Wang,et al.  Mass transfer in coal seams for CO2 sequestration , 2007 .

[45]  Pathegama Gamage Ranjith,et al.  Effects of effective stress changes on permeability of latrobe valley brown coal , 2011 .

[46]  John W. Larsen,et al.  The effects of dissolved CO2 on coal structure and properties , 2004 .