Statistical methods applied to the study of opinion formation models: a brief overview and results of a numerical study of a model based on the social impact theory

The aim of this paper is twofold. On the one hand we present a brief overview on the application of statistical physics methods to the modelling of social phenomena focusing our attention on models for opinion formation. On the other hand, we discuss and present original results of a model for opinion formation based on the social impact theory developed by Latane. The presented model accounts for the interaction among the members of a social group under the competitive influence of a strong leader and the mass media, both supporting two different states of opinion. Extensive simulations of the model are presented, showing that they led to the observation of a rich scenery of complex behaviour including, among others, critical behaviour and phase transitions between a state of opinion dominated by the leader and another dominated by the mass media. The occurrence of interesting finite-size effects reveals that, in small communities, the opinion of the leader may prevail over that of the mass media. This observation is relevant for the understanding of social phenomena involving a finite number of individuals, in contrast to actual physical phase transitions that take place in the thermodynamic limit. Finally, we give a brief outlook of open questions and lines for future work.

[1]  M. Mobilia.  Does a single zealot affect an infinite group of voters? , 2003, Physical review letters.

[2]  Wolfgang Weidlich,et al.  Sociodynamics: a Systematic Approach to Mathematical Modelling in the Social Sciences , 2000 .

[3]  Philip Ball,et al.  The physical modelling of society: a historical perspective , 2002 .

[4]  Albano.  Self-Organized Collective Displacements of Self-Driven Individuals. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[5]  Jean-Daniel Zucker,et al.  From Individual Choice to Group Decision Making , 2000 .

[6]  Johannes J. Schneider.  The Influence Of Contrarians And Opportunists On The Stability Of A Democracy In The Sznajd Model , 2004 .

[7]  Clelia M. Bordogna,et al.  Phase Transitions In A Social Impact Model For Opinion Formation , 2006 .

[8]  K. Sznajd-Weron,et al.  International Journal of Modern Physics C, Vol. 13, No. 1 (2002) 1--9 , 2022 .

[9]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Meet, discuss, and segregate! , 2002, Complex..

[10]  M. San Miguel,et al.  Neighborhood models of minority opinion spreading , 2004, cond-mat/0403339.

[11]  Clelia M. Bordogna,et al.  PHASE TRANSITIONS IN A MODEL FOR SOCIAL LEARNING VIA THE INTERNET , 2001 .

[12]  Wolfgang Weidlich,et al.  Physics and social science — The approach of synergetics , 1991 .

[13]  D. Stauffer,et al.  Persistence of opinion in the Sznajd consensus model: computer simulation , 2002 .

[14]  D. Stauffer.  The Sznajd Model of Consensus Building with Limited Persuasion , 2001, cond-mat/0111419.

[15]  H. Wio,et al.  Van Kampen's expansion approach in an opinion formation model , 2006, physics/0603047.

[16]  Raúl Toral,et al.  Role of dimensionality in Axelrod's model for the dissemination of culture , 2003 .

[17]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[18]  J. Schneider,et al.  SCALING LAWS FOR THE LIFETIMES OF GOVERNMENTS IN THE SZNAJD DEMOCRACY , 2005 .

[19]  R. Axelrod.  The Dissemination of Culture , 1997 .

[20]  F. Schweitzer,et al.  SOCIAL IMPACT MODELS OF OPINION DYNAMICS , 2001 .

[21]  Marsili,et al.  Nonequilibrium phase transition in a model for social influence , 2000, Physical review letters.

[22]  Bastien Chopard,et al.  Competing species dynamics: Qualitative advantage versus geography , 1998, cond-mat/9812361.

[23]  C. Tessone,et al.  On the influence of noise on the critical and oscillatory behavior of a predator-prey model: coherent stochastic resonance at the proper frequency of the system , 2000, cond-mat/0012366.

[24]  P. A. Rikvold,et al.  Kinetic Ising Model in an Oscillating Field: Finite-Size Scaling at the Dynamic Phase Transition , 1998 .

[25]  F. Schweitzer,et al.  Modelling collective opinion formation by means of active Brownian particles , 1999, adap-org/9911005.

[26]  D. Stauffer.  Introduction to statistical physics outside physics , 2003, cond-mat/0310037.

[27]  F. Slanina,et al.  Analytical results for the Sznajd model of opinion formation , 2003, cond-mat/0305102.

[28]  S. Redner,et al.  Dynamics of majority rule in two-state interacting spin systems. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[29]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Mixing beliefs among interacting agents , 2000, Adv. Complex Syst..

[30]  B. Latané.  The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[31]  G. A. Kohring,et al.  Ising Models of Social Impact: the Role of Cumulative Advantage , 1996 .

[32]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[33]  Roblin,et al.  Automata network predator-prey model with pursuit and evasion. , 1994, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[34]  B. Latané,et al.  Statistical mechanics of social impact. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[35]  Hermann Haken,et al.  Synergetics: An Introduction , 1983 .

[36]  Dietrich Stauffer,et al.  GENERALIZATION TO SQUARE LATTICE OF SZNAJD SOCIOPHYSICS MODEL , 2000 .

[37]  Johannes J. Schneider,et al.  The democracy ochlocracy dictatorship transition in the Sznajd model and in the Ising model , 2005 .

[38]  Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron,et al.  Opinion evolution in closed community , 2000, cond-mat/0101130.

[39]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Ordering phase transition in the one-dimensional Axelrod model , 2002 .

[40]  E. Albano,et al.  A self-organized system of smart preys and predators , 2004 .

[41]  H. Chaté,et al.  Onset of collective and cohesive motion. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[42]  K. Sznajd-Weron,et al.  How effective is advertising in duopoly markets , 2002 .

[43]  Raúl Toral,et al.  Global culture: a noise-induced transition in finite systems. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[44]  Claudio J. Tessone,et al.  System size stochastic resonance in a model for opinion formation , 2004, cond-mat/0409620.

[45]  Serge Galam,et al.  Sociophysics: a personal testimony , 2004, physics/0403122.

[46]  Raúl Toral,et al.  Nonequilibrium transitions in complex networks: a model of social interaction. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[47]  R. Orava,et al.  Ways to detect a light Higgs boson at the LHC , 2002 .

[48]  R. Ochrombel,et al.  Simulation Of Sznajd Sociophysics Model With Convincing Single Opinions , 2001 .

[49]  E V Albano,et al.  Theoretical description of teaching-learning processes: a multidisciplinary approach. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[50]  A. Sutera,et al.  The mechanism of stochastic resonance , 1981 .

[51]  J. Hołyst,et al.  Phase transitions as a persistent feature of groups with leaders in models of opinion formation , 2000 .

[52]  F. Amblard,et al.  The role of network topology on extremism propagation with the Relative Agreement opinion dynamics , 2004 .

[53]  Frank Schweitzer,et al.  Phase transitions in social impact models of opinion formation , 2000 .

[54]  P. Babinec.  Stochastic resonance in the Weidlich model of public opinion formation , 1997 .

[55]  K Sznajd-Weron.  Controlling simple dynamics by a disagreement function. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[56]  Serge Galam,et al.  Modelling rumors: the no plane Pentagon French hoax case , 2002, cond-mat/0211571.

[57]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[58]  Mingfeng He,et al.  OPINION EVOLUTION MODEL WITH THE STATE OF NEUTRALITY , 2004 .

[59]  Ezequiel V. Albano,et al.  Study of a lattice-gas model for a prey–predator system , 1999 .

[60]  E. Albano,et al.  Altruism: A natural strategy for enhancing survival , 2006 .

[61]  M. F. Laguna,et al.  The dynamics of opinion in hierarchical organizations , 2005 .

[62]  Dietrich Stauffer.  Percolation And Galam Theory Of Minority Opinion Spreading , 2002 .