Dialectic Tensions of Information Quality: Social Networking Sites and Hiring

The hiring process is challenging as the lack of quality information limits the discovery of the true nature of candidates, potentially leading to adverse impacts. Social networking sites (SNSs) have emerged as a potential source for candidate information with more than one billion profiles online. While abundant, the quality of this information for hiring is questionable. Utilizing qualitative interview data, the paper finds issues of quality to be complex as these technologies provide affordances that contradict one another. Tensions within dimensions of information quality were found to consist of dialectic poles: accessibility (open-restricted), contextual (relevant-unsuitable), and intrinsic (reliable-questionable). Understanding these tensions is necessary to explain the nature of perceptions of SNS information quality in the hiring context.

[1]  E. Eisenberg.  Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication , 1984 .

[2]  Daniel M. Cable,et al.  Person–Organization Fit, Job Choice Decisions, and Organizational Entry☆ , 1996 .

[3]  J. Kenneth Benson,et al.  Organizations: A Dialectical View. , 1977 .

[4]  John M. Barron,et al.  Employer Search: The Interviewing and Hiring of New Employees , 1985 .

[5]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Understanding user evaluations of information systems , 1995 .

[6]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  FEATURESocial network sites and society: current trends and future possibilities , 2009, INTR.

[7]  D. Boyd.  Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life , 2007 .

[8]  M. Marshall.  Sampling for qualitative research. , 1996, Family practice.

[9]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Dialectics of Collective Minding: Contradictory Appropriations of Information Technology in a High-Risk Project , 2012, MIS Q..

[10]  D. Massaro,et al.  Models of integration given multiple sources of information. , 1990, Psychological review.

[11]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[12]  John H. Miller,et al.  Communication and cooperation , 1998 .

[13]  William H. Ross,et al.  Should human resource managers use social media to screen job applicants? Managerial and legal issues in the USA , 2012 .

[14]  Stephen E. Arnold,et al.  Information manufacturing: the road to database quality , 1992 .

[15]  J. Bert Keats,et al.  Quality Planning and Analysis , 1981 .

[16]  Giuseppe Riva,et al.  Communication and Cooperation in Networked Environments: An Experimental Analysis , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[17]  Judith Donath,et al.  Public Displays of Connection , 2004 .

[18]  W. Creed,et al.  Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective , 2002 .

[19]  M. Patton.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[20]  Lee O. Thayer,et al.  Organization--communication : emerging perspectives , 1986 .

[21]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  "Why won't you be my Facebook friend?": strategies for managing context collapse in the workplace , 2012, iConference '12.

[22]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility , 2007 .

[23]  N. Hoffart.  Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[24]  Mary Jane Willshire,et al.  A Data Quality Engineering Framework , 1997, IQ.

[25]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Variations in Decision Makers' Use of Information Sources: The Impact of Quality and Accessibility of Information. , 1980 .

[26]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[27]  Per Capita,et al.  About the authors , 1995, Machine Vision and Applications.

[28]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[29]  C. Urquhart.  An encounter with grounded theory: tackling the practical and philosophical issues , 2001 .

[30]  J. Sherblom,et al.  Human Communication . A Publication of the Pacific and Asian Communication Association , 2008 .

[31]  Adam N. Joinson,et al.  Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: motives and use of facebook , 2008, CHI.

[32]  K. Charmaz,et al.  The sage handbook of grounded theory , 2007 .

[33]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Innovating Mindfully with Information Technology , 2004, MIS Q..

[34]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  To disclose or not: publicness in social networking sites , 2011, Inf. Technol. People.

[35]  James A. Danowski,et al.  The Faces of Facebookers: Investigating Social Enhancement and Social Compensation Hypotheses; Predicting FacebookTM and Offline Popularity from Sociability and Self-Esteem, and Mapping the Meanings of Popularity with Semantic Networks , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[36]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[37]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[38]  Ofer Arazy,et al.  On the measurability of information quality , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[39]  P. Bosserman,et al.  The Twentieth Century's Saint-Simon: Georges Gurvitch's Dialectical Sociology and the New Physics , 1995 .

[40]  F. M. Gryna.  Quality planning and analysis , 1970 .

[41]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[42]  Michele H. Jackson,et al.  The Connectivity Paradox: Using Technology to Both Decrease and Increase Perceptions of Distance in Distributed Work Arrangements , 2010 .

[43]  Robert A. Baron,et al.  Self-Presentation in Job Interviews: When There Can Be “Too Much of a Good Thing”1 , 1986 .

[44]  Robert L. Dipboye,et al.  Interviewer Experience and Expertise Effects , 1999 .

[45]  Charles R. Berger,et al.  Studies in interpersonal epistemology: III. Anticipated interaction, self‐monitoring, and observational context selection , 1981 .

[46]  The Sound of One Hand Clapping , 1998 .

[47]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Reliability, Mindfulness, and Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[48]  R. Koenker,et al.  Uncertainty, Hiring and Subsequent Performance: The NFL Draft , 2003 .

[49]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Friendster and publicly articulated social networking , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[50]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The Disruptive Nature of Information Technology Innovations: The Case of Internet Computing in Systems Development Organizations , 2003, MIS Q..

[51]  Leslie A. Baxter,et al.  Dialectical Contradictions in Relationship Development , 1990 .

[52]  Amanda Holt,et al.  Using the telephone for narrative interviewing: a research note , 2010 .

[53]  Sarah J. Tracy.  Dialectic, contradiction, or double bind? Analyzing and theorizing employee reactions to organizational tension , 2004 .

[54]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[55]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  HR as a Source of Shareholder Value: Research and Recommendations , 1997 .

[56]  Heather Richter Lipford,et al.  Understanding Privacy Settings in Facebook with an Audience View , 2008, UPSEC.

[57]  J. Morse.  Sampling in Grounded Theory , 2007 .

[58]  Les Gasser,et al.  A framework for information quality assessment , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..