Predicting invasion success in complex ecological networks

A central and perhaps insurmountable challenge of invasion ecology is to predict which combinations of species and habitats most effectively promote and prevent biological invasions. Here, we integrate models of network structure and nonlinear population dynamics to search for potential generalities among trophic factors that may drive invasion success and failure. We simulate invasions where 100 different species attempt to invade 150 different food webs with 15–26 species and a wide range (0.06–0.32) of connectance. These simulations yield 11 438 invasion attempts by non-basal species, 47 per cent of which are successful. At the time of introduction, whether or not the invader is a generalist best predicts final invasion success; however, once the invader establishes itself, it is best distinguished from unsuccessful invaders by occupying a lower trophic position and being relatively invulnerable to predation. In general, variables that reflect the interaction between an invading species and its new community, such as generality and trophic position, best predict invasion success; however, for some trophic categories of invaders, fundamental species traits, such as having the centre of the feeding range low on the theoretical niche axis (for non-omnivorous and omnivorous herbivores), or the topology of the food web (for tertiary carnivores), best predict invasion success. Across all invasion scenarios, a discriminant analysis model predicted successful and failed invasions with 76.5 per cent accuracy for properties at the time of introduction or 100 per cent accuracy for properties at the time of establishment. More generally, our results suggest that tackling the challenge of predicting the properties of species and habitats that promote or inhibit invasions from food web perspective may aid ecologists in identifying rules that govern invasions in natural ecosystems.

[1]  K. Havens,et al.  Scale and Structure in Natural Food Webs , 1992, Science.

[2]  W. Post,et al.  Community assembly and food web stability , 1983 .

[3]  J. Geller,et al.  Ecological Roulette: The Global Transport of Nonindigenous Marine Organisms , 1993, Science.

[4]  James A. Drake,et al.  The mechanics of community assembly and succession , 1990 .

[5]  S. Ellner,et al.  Predator–prey cycles in an aquatic microcosm: testing hypotheses of mechanism , 2002 .

[6]  S. Ellner,et al.  Crossing the hopf bifurcation in a live predator-prey system. , 2000, Science.

[7]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Stabilization of chaotic and non-permanent food-web dynamics , 2004 .

[8]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Scaling up keystone effects from simple to complex ecological networks , 2005 .

[9]  Daniel B. Stouffer,et al.  Evidence for the existence of a robust pattern of prey selection in food webs , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  M. Enserink Biological Invaders Sweep In , 1999, Science.

[11]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  Community Food Webs: Data and Theory , 1990 .

[12]  Jean-Pierre Gabriel,et al.  Phylogenetic constraints and adaptation explain food-web structure , 2004, Nature.

[13]  J. E. Cohen,et al.  Trophic links of community food webs. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Jennifer A. Dunne,et al.  Network structure and robustness of marine food webs , 2004 .

[15]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Allometric scaling enhances stability in complex food webs. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[16]  D. Strayer,et al.  Invasion success of vertebrates in Europe and North America. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  J. F. Gilliam,et al.  FUNCTIONAL RESPONSES WITH PREDATOR INTERFERENCE: VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE HOLLING TYPE II MODEL , 2001 .

[18]  P. Yodzis,et al.  In search of operational trophospecies in a tropical aquatic food web , 1999 .

[19]  Richard J. Williams,et al.  Effects of network and dynamical model structure on species persistence in large model food webs , 2008, Theoretical Ecology.

[20]  M. Hemberg,et al.  Trophic levels and trophic tangles: the prevalence of omnivory in real food webs. , 2007, Ecology.

[21]  Ulrich Brose,et al.  Allometric degree distributions facilitate food-web stability , 2007, Nature.

[22]  A. Hastings,et al.  Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature , 1998, Nature.

[23]  T. Blackburn,et al.  The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Two degrees of separation in complex food webs , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  P. Yodzis,et al.  Body Size and Consumer-Resource Dynamics , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[26]  D. Lodge,et al.  Biological invasions: Lessons for ecology. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  Prendergast,et al.  The macroecology of population dynamics: taxonomic and biogeographic patterns in population cycles , 1998 .

[28]  John Harte,et al.  Response of complex food webs to realistic extinction sequences. , 2007, Ecology.

[29]  M. Pascual,et al.  Ecological networks : Linking structure to dynamics in food webs , 2006 .

[30]  Thomas W. Schoener,et al.  Food Webs From the Small to the Large: The Robert H. MacArthur Award Lecture , 1989 .

[31]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Effect of scale on food web structure. , 1993, Science.

[32]  Neo D. Martinez Artifacts or Attributes? Effects of Resolution on the Little Rock Lake Food Web , 1991 .

[33]  D. Strayer,et al.  Determinants of vertebrate invasion success in Europe and North America , 2006 .

[34]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  A Model for Tropic Interaction , 1975 .

[35]  Jennifer A. Dunne,et al.  The Network Structure of Food Webs , 2005 .

[36]  Donald L. DeAngelis,et al.  A MODEL FOR TROPHIC INTERACTION , 1975 .

[37]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: robustness increases with connectance , 2002, Ecology Letters.

[38]  M. Hassell,et al.  New Inductive Population Model for Insect Parasites and its Bearing on Biological Control , 1969, Nature.

[39]  J. Ruesink Global Analysis of Factors Affecting the Outcome of Freshwater Fish Introductions , 2005 .

[40]  Kevin McCann,et al.  Structural asymmetry and the stability of diverse food webs , 2006, Nature.

[41]  Rita R. Colwell,et al.  Global spread of microorganisms by ships , 2000, Nature.

[42]  James T. Carlton,et al.  Transoceanic and interoceanic dispersal of coastal marine organisms: the biology of ballast water , 1985 .

[43]  J. Levine,et al.  Biological Invasions , 2004 .

[44]  L. Amaral,et al.  A robust measure of food web intervality , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  J. Beddington,et al.  Mutual Interference Between Parasites or Predators and its Effect on Searching Efficiency , 1975 .

[46]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Limits to Trophic Levels and Omnivory in Complex Food Webs: Theory and Data , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[47]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Diversity, Complexity, and Persistence in Large Model Ecosystems , 2005 .

[48]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Success and its limits among structural models of complex food webs. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[49]  Chad L. Hewitt,et al.  Invasion Success and Community Resistance in Single and Multiple Species Invasion Models: Do the Models Support the Conclusions? , 2002, Biological Invasions.

[50]  C. S. Holling Some Characteristics of Simple Types of Predation and Parasitism , 1959, The Canadian Entomologist.

[51]  Chris Bright,et al.  Life Out of Bounds: Bioinvasion in a Borderless World , 1998 .

[52]  R. Guimerà,et al.  QUANTITATIVE PATTERNS IN THE STRUCTURE OF MODEL AND EMPIRICAL FOOD WEBS , 2004, q-bio/0401023.

[53]  Jeremy W. Fox,et al.  Current food web models cannot explain the overall topological structure of observed food webs , 2006 .

[54]  Kazuto Nakada,et al.  A General Model for Food Web Structure , 2008 .

[55]  A. Solow,et al.  ON LUMPING SPECIES IN FOOD WEBS , 1998 .

[56]  Kevin S. McCann,et al.  Bifurcation Structure of a Three-Species Food-Chain Model , 1995 .

[57]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Food-web structure and network theory: The role of connectance and size , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  James H. Brown,et al.  Toward a metabolic theory of ecology , 2004 .

[59]  Neo D. Martinez Effects of resolution on food web structure , 1993 .

[60]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Re–evaluating the omnivory–stability relationship in food webs , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[61]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[62]  J. Montoya,et al.  Small world patterns in food webs. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[63]  J. Kurchan,et al.  The collective dynamics , 1990 .

[64]  M. Pascual,et al.  From Small to Large Ecological Networks in a Dynamic World , 2005 .

[65]  C. S. Holling The components of prédation as revealed by a study of small-mammal prédation of the European pine sawfly. , 1959 .

[66]  Neo D. Martinez Constant Connectance in Community Food Webs , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[67]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  Community food webs have scale-invariant structure , 1984, Nature.

[68]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Simple rules yield complex food webs , 2000, Nature.

[69]  Bradford A. Hawkins,et al.  EFFECTS OF SAMPLING EFFORT ON CHARACTERIZATION OF FOOD-WEB STRUCTURE , 1999 .

[70]  P. Chesson,et al.  Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions , 2002 .

[71]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Robust patterns in food web structure. , 2001, Physical review letters.