Eccentricity Bias as an Organizing Principle for Human High-Order Object Areas

We have recently proposed a center-periphery organization based on resolution needs, in which objects engaging in recognition processes requiring central-vision (e.g., face-related) are associated with center-biased representations, while objects requiring large-scale feature integration (e.g., buildings) are associated with periphery-biased representations. Here we tested this hypothesis by comparing the center-periphery organization with activations to five object categories: faces, buildings, tools, letter strings, and words. We found that faces, letter strings, and words were mapped preferentially within the center-biased representation. Faces showed a hemispheric lateralization opposite to that of letter strings and words. In contrast, buildings were mapped mainly to the periphery-biased representation, while tools activated both central and peripheral representations. The results are compatible with the notion that center-periphery organization allows the optimal allocation of cortical magnification to the specific requirements of various recognition processes.

[1]  S. Bookheimer,et al.  Regional cerebral blood flow during object naming and word reading , 1995 .

[2]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  R. Ivry,et al.  The two sides of perception , 1997 .

[4]  E. Halgren,et al.  Location of human face‐selective cortex with respect to retinotopic areas , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[5]  Jyrki Rovamo,et al.  Identification of facial images in peripheral vision , 2001, Vision Research.

[6]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[7]  C. Price,et al.  Three Distinct Ventral Occipitotemporal Regions for Reading and Object Naming , 1999, NeuroImage.

[8]  M. Tagamets,et al.  A Parametric Approach to Orthographic Processing in the Brain: An fMRI Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  The , 1966 .

[10]  S Edelman,et al.  Representation is representation of similarities , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Mapping striate and extrastriate visual areas in human cerebral cortex. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Visual complexity in letter-by-letter reading: Pure alexia is not pure , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  R. Malach,et al.  The topography of high-order human object areas , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  A. Dale,et al.  Functional Analysis of V3A and Related Areas in Human Visual Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  M. Tarr,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area is Part of a Network that Processes Faces at the Individual Level , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  T. Nazir,et al.  Letter visibility and word recognition: The optimal viewing position in printed words , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  D. Bub,et al.  The Neural Substrate for Concrete, Abstract, and Emotional Word Lexica A Positron Emission Tomography Study , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  M C Morrone,et al.  Recognition of Positive and Negative Bandpass-Filtered Images , 1986, Perception.

[19]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Science.

[20]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys , 1995, Current Biology.

[21]  A. Oliva,et al.  Coarse Blobs or Fine Edges? Evidence That Information Diagnosticity Changes the Perception of Complex Visual Stimuli , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  I. Craw,et al.  Effects of high-pass and low-pass spatial filtering on face identification , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  R. Jacobs Computational studies of the development of functionally specialized neural modules , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection , 1999, Nature.

[25]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[26]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Vase or face? A neural correlate of shape-selective grouping processes in the human brain , 2001, NeuroImage.

[27]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  An Area within Human Ventral Cortex Sensitive to “Building” Stimuli Evidence and Implications , 1998, Neuron.

[28]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  A Cortical Area Selective for Visual Processing of the Human Body , 2001, Science.

[30]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing. , 1978, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  B. Horwitz,et al.  Phonological and orthographic components of word recognition. A PET-rCBF study. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  S. P. Springer,et al.  Left brain, right brain , 1981 .

[33]  A P Leff,et al.  The functional anatomy of single-word reading in patients with hemianopic and pure alexia. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[34]  R. Frackowiak,et al.  Demonstrating the implicit processing of visually presented words and pseudowords. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  S. Ferber,et al.  Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe , 2001, Nature.

[36]  I. Craw,et al.  Spatial Content and Spatial Quantisation Effects in Face Recognition , 1994, Perception.

[37]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  Kensuke Sekihara,et al.  Activation of Lateral Extrastriate Areas during Orthographic Processing of Japanese Characters Studied with fMRI , 1999, NeuroImage.

[39]  K. Nakayama,et al.  RESPONSE PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN FUSIFORM FACE AREA , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[40]  R. Tootell,et al.  Where is 'dorsal V4' in human visual cortex? Retinotopic, topographic and functional evidence. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[42]  Josh H. McDermott,et al.  Functional imaging of human visual recognition. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[43]  H T Kukkonen,et al.  The effect of contrast and size scaling on face perception in foveal and extrafoveal vision. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[44]  T. Hendler,et al.  A hierarchical axis of object processing stages in the human visual cortex. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[45]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Hierarchical Organization of the Human Auditory Cortex Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  S. Petersen,et al.  Neuroimaging studies of word reading. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  S. Edelman,et al.  Cue-Invariant Activation in Object-Related Areas of the Human Occipital Lobe , 1998, Neuron.

[48]  M. Hasselmo,et al.  The effect of learning on the face selective responses of neurons in the cortex in the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[49]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Center–periphery organization of human object areas , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[51]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[52]  M. Tarr,et al.  FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[53]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Effects of shape-discrimination training on the selectivity of inferotemporal cells in adult monkeys. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[54]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Effects of Presentation Rate During Word and Pseudoword Reading: A Comparison of PET and fMRI , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[55]  Adrian T. Lee,et al.  fMRI of human visual cortex , 1994, Nature.

[56]  P. Bennett,et al.  Identification of band-pass filtered letters and faces by human and ideal observers , 1999, Vision Research.

[57]  S. Edelman,et al.  Human Brain Mapping 6:316–328(1998) � A Sequence of Object-Processing Stages Revealed by fMRI in the Human Occipital Lobe , 2022 .

[58]  T. Allison,et al.  Differential Sensitivity of Human Visual Cortex to Faces, Letterstrings, and Textures: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[59]  G. E. Smith The Human Brain , 1924, Nature.

[60]  A. Oliva,et al.  Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: when categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations , 1999, Cognition.

[61]  J. Haxby,et al.  Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.