Chapter 11 Whither Port Strategy? Theory and Practice in Conflict

This chapter analyses the design of the Greek port reform strategy, and provides a twofold assessment of how this strategy has been implemented in practice. Following a discussion of the background of the port reforms and the new statutory formation of the Greek port system that has evolved during the last eight years, the chapter provides an assessment of the resulting port governance fit. Then, the chapter provides empirical evidence of the financial performance of the Greek ports' performance in the post-devolution period. This discussion concludes that the endorsed strategy has not managed to reverse the suboptimal state of the Greek port system, due to a conflict between the scope of the governance choices and the actual developments. As the search of a long-term Greek port strategy continues, there is substantial evidence of indecisiveness and a number of failures. Given the dynamics of the economic and policy environment and the challenges and opportunities they pose to the port hierarchy, the need to correct these inconsistencies and enhance the Greek ports' competitiveness is eminent. Among others, this study argues that future essential changes should include the lowering of entry-barriers and the introduction of intra-port competition, labour reforms, limitation of the existing political interference and the establishment of really autonomous port authorities.

[1]  Enzo Defilippi,et al.  Port Infrastructure: An Access Model for the Essential Facility , 2003 .

[2]  A. Pallis Port governance in Greece , 2007 .

[3]  Theodore Syriopoulos,et al.  Port governance models: Financial evaluation of Greek port restructuring , 2007 .

[4]  T. Notteboom,et al.  Stakeholders relations management in ports: dealing with the interplay of forces among stakeholders in a changing competitive environment , 2002 .

[5]  Marisa A. Valleri,et al.  Port governance in Italy , 2007 .

[6]  Van der Horst,et al.  New indicators to measure port performance , 2007 .

[7]  S. Everett Corporatization: a legislative framework for port inefficiencies , 2003 .

[8]  Khalid Bichou,et al.  Chapter 24 Review of Port Performance Approaches and a Supply Chain Framework to Port Performance Benchmarking , 2006 .

[9]  Athanasios A. Pallis,et al.  Entry barriers in seaports , 2007, Port Economics, Management and Policy.

[10]  Wayne K. Talley,et al.  Port performance : an economics perspective , 2007 .

[11]  Mary R. Brooks,et al.  Chapter 25 Issues in Measuring Port Devolution Program Performance: A Managerial Perspective , 2006 .

[12]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  Asian container ports : development, competition and co-operation , 2007 .

[13]  Mary R. Brooks,et al.  Chapter 17 Port Governance, Devolution and the Matching Framework: A Configuration Theory Approach , 2006 .

[14]  Chung Yu,et al.  A STUDY ON INTEGRATED PORT PERFORMANCE COMPARISON BASED ON THE CONCEPT OF BALANCED SCORECARD , 2003 .

[15]  Harilaos N. Psaraftis Tariff Reform in the Port of Piraeus: a Practical Approach , 2005 .

[16]  Trevor D. Heaver,et al.  The Evolution and Challenges of Port Economics , 2006 .

[17]  B. J. Thomas The privatization of United Kingdom seaports , 1994 .

[18]  Adolf K.Y. Ng,et al.  PORT GOVERNANCE IN CHINA: A REVIEW OF POLICIES IN AN ERA OF INTERNATIONALIZING PORT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES , 2004 .

[19]  M. Brooks Port devolution and governance in Canada , 2007 .

[20]  D. Newman,et al.  Federal ports policy , 2003 .

[21]  Theo Notteboom,et al.  Reassessing Public Sector Involvement in European Seaports , 2001 .

[22]  Khalid Bichou,et al.  A critical review of conventional terminology for classifying seaports , 2005 .

[23]  C. Barros,et al.  Efficiency in European Seaports with DEA: Evidence from Greece and Portugal , 2004 .

[24]  Claudio Ferrari,et al.  Port Investment: Profitability, Economic Impact and Financing , 2006 .

[25]  Peter Turnbull,et al.  Private profit, public loss: The financial and economic performance of U.K. ports , 1997 .

[26]  Alexandros M Goulielmos DEREGULATION IN MAJOR GREEK PORTS: THE WAY IT HAS TO BE DONE , 1999 .

[27]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue Appropriate models of port governance: Lessons from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey , 2004 .

[28]  J. Hoffmann Latin American Ports: Results and Determinants of Private Sector Participation , 2001 .

[29]  Koi Yu Adolf Ng Assessing the Attractiveness of Ports in the North European Container Transhipment Market: An Agenda for Future Research in Port Competition , 2006 .

[30]  P. Langen,et al.  Clustering and performance: the case of maritime clustering in The Netherlands , 2002 .

[31]  Athanasios A. Pallis TOWARDS A COMMON PORTS POLICY? EU-PROPOSALS AND THE PORTS INDUSTRY'S PERCEPTIONS , 1997 .

[32]  Athanasios A. Pallis,et al.  Port Competitiveness and the EU ‘Port Services’ Directive: the Case of Greek Ports , 2005 .

[33]  Anthony Kenneth Charles Beresford,et al.  An Application of AHP on Transhipment Port Selection: A Global Perspective , 2004 .

[34]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue,et al.  Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development , 2005 .

[35]  Theo Notteboom,et al.  Concession agreements as port governance tools , 2006 .

[36]  Prabir De,et al.  Causality between performance and traffic: an investigation with Indian ports , 2003 .