Integrated development of modular product platforms

The systematic fostering of economies of scale is essential for companies to obtain their competitiveness in the future. A proven solution for the resulting dilemma between scale and scope are modular product platforms, which can be designed in two different ways: Modules can be developed either for a dedicated product line and then be added to the platform or they can be developed directly for the entire modular product platform the products are derived from. A recent survey conducted by our chair states that developing modules for the entire platform covers a higher potential to create commonalities. However, this approach requires more capabilities to cope with complexity, since individual development projects are highly interconnected and no longer subject to the requirements of only a single product line. Current research approaches mainly focus on the design of modular platforms, whereas challenges concerning the design of the related organizational structure are hardly considered. This paper aims at presenting an organizational framework for the integrated design of modular product platforms. A process model has been developed containing the following steps: planning of platform products, design of modular product platform structures using degrees of freedom, development of modules and configuration and adaptation of products.

[1]  Ram D. Sriram,et al.  Platform-based product design and development: A knowledge-intensive support approach , 2006, Knowl. Based Syst..

[2]  Wolfgang Beitz,et al.  Konstruktionslehre : Grundlagen erfolgreicher Produktentwicklung Methoden und Anwendung , 2005 .

[3]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .

[4]  Günther Schuh,et al.  A SCIENTIFIC FOUNDATION OF COLLABORATIVE ENGINEERING , 2007 .

[5]  Javier P. Gonzalez-Zugasti,et al.  Modular product architecture , 2001 .

[6]  S. Sanderson,et al.  A framework for model and product family competition , 1995 .

[7]  Wei Chen,et al.  A Variation-Based Methodology for Product Family Design , 2000, Volume 2: 26th Design Automation Conference.

[8]  Günther Schuh,et al.  Focussing product innovation and fostering economies of scale based on adaptive product platforms , 2009 .

[9]  Javier P. Gonzalez-Zugasti,et al.  ASSESSING VALUE FOR PRODUCT FAMILY DESIGN AND SELECTION , 1999 .

[10]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Product platform design: method and application , 2001 .

[11]  Rudolf Koller,et al.  Konstruktionslehre für den Maschinenbau , 1985 .

[12]  Zahed Siddique,et al.  Common platform development :designing for product variety , 2000 .

[13]  Jens Arnoscht,et al.  A generic model to handle complexity in collaborative networks , 2009, PICMET '09 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.

[14]  Magnus Persson,et al.  Managerial issues in modularising complex products , 2006 .

[15]  G. Schuh,et al.  Lean innovation: introducing value systems to product development , 2008, PICMET '08 - 2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.

[16]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Commonality decisions in product family design , 2006 .

[17]  Moreno Muffatto,et al.  Developing product platforms:: analysis of the development process , 2000 .

[18]  Andrew Y. C. Nee,et al.  Platform differentiation plan for platform leverage across market niches , 2008 .