Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy skills acquisition: augmented reality simulator versus human cadaver training models.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare a simulator with the human cadaver model for hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal skills acquisition training. DESIGN An observational prospective comparative study was conducted to compare the laparoscopic surgery training models. SETTING The study took place during the laparoscopic colectomy training course performed at the annual scientific meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. PARTICIPANTS Thirty four practicing surgeons performed hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy on human cadavers (n = 7) and on an augmented reality simulator (n = 27). Prior laparoscopic colorectal experience was assessed. Trainers and trainees completed independently objective structured assessment forms. Training models were compared by trainees' technical skills scores, events scores, and satisfaction. RESULTS Prior laparoscopic experience was similar in both surgeon groups. Generic and specific skills scores were similar on both training models. Generic events scores were significantly better on the cadaver model. The 2 most frequent generic events occurring on the simulator were poor hand-eye coordination and inefficient use of retraction. Specific events were scored better on the simulator and reached the significance limit (p = 0.051) for trainers. The specific events occurring on the cadaver were intestinal perforation and left ureter identification difficulties. Overall satisfaction was better for the cadaver than for the simulator model (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS With regard to skills scores, the augmented reality simulator had adequate qualities for the hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy training. Nevertheless, events scores highlighted weaknesses of the anatomical replication on the simulator. Although improvements likely will be required to incorporate the simulator more routinely into the colorectal training, it may be useful in its current form for more junior trainees or those early on their learning curve.

[1]  C. Abbou,et al.  Cadaveric versus Porcine Models in Urological Laparoscopic Training , 2003, Urologia Internationalis.

[2]  M. Okajima,et al.  Hybrid Hand-Assisted Colectomy for Transverse Colon Cancer: A Useful Technique for Non-Expert Laparoscopic Surgeons , 2009, World Journal of Surgery.

[3]  L. Krähenbühl,et al.  Laparoscopic training on Thiel human cadavers: A model to teach advanced laparoscopic procedures , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[4]  G. Maddern,et al.  A Systematic Review of Skills Transfer After Surgical Simulation Training , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[5]  Leif Hedman,et al.  Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. , 2007, American journal of surgery.

[6]  Sudip K. Sarker,et al.  Assessing Operative Performance in Advanced Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery , 2010, World Journal of Surgery.

[7]  R. Satava,et al.  Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blinded Study , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[8]  T. Grantcharov,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[9]  A. Supe,et al.  Cadaver as a model for laparoscopic training. , 2005, Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology.

[10]  D. Larson,et al.  Experience with 969 minimal access colectomies: the role of hand-assisted laparoscopy in expanding minimally invasive surgery for complex colectomies. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[11]  F. Leblanc,et al.  A comparison of human cadaver and augmented reality simulator models for straight laparoscopic colorectal skills acquisition training. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[12]  I. Sasaki,et al.  Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic vs. Open Subtotal Colectomy for Severe Ulcerative Colitis , 2009, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[13]  J. Fleshman,et al.  Adoption of Laparoscopic Colectomy: Results and Implications of ASCRS Hands-On Course Participation , 2008, Surgical innovation.

[14]  A. Rojanasakul,et al.  Minimally invasive surgery training in soft cadaver (MIST-SC). , 2005, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[15]  Anthony G. Gallagher,et al.  Construct validation of a novel hybrid virtual-reality simulator for training and assessing laparoscopic colectomy; results from the first course for experienced senior laparoscopic surgeons , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[16]  R. Reznick,et al.  Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents , 1997, The British journal of surgery.