Teachers' perceptions of using robotics in primary/elementary schools in Newfoundland and Labrador

Robotics, with its multidisciplinary nature, integrates Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) disciplines and is considered a gateway to STEM education. This study aims to understand whether primary/elementary teachers perceive robotics as a useful tool for STEM education or not. This study also seeks to better understand primary/elementary teachers’ perceptions of the barriers of using robotics and the support that they need. A sample of 11 primary/elementary teachers from Newfoundland and Labrador English Schools District (NLESD) participated in this study. The results of this study revealed that the participants perceive robotics to have the potential to facilitate learning of primary/elementary science and technology-related topics, while they do not perceive robotics to be a useful tool for learning mathematics. The participants also perceived robotics to have positive effects on students’ lifelong learning skills. Furthermore, the participants indicated a number of barriers to integrate robotics into their teaching activities and expressed the supports that they need.

[1]  Christina Chalmers,et al.  Preservice teachers teaching technology with robotics , 2012 .

[2]  Arthur J. Reynolds,et al.  School-Based Early Childhood Education and Age-28 Well-Being: Effects by Timing, Dosage, and Subgroups , 2011, Science.

[3]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Teaching Partnerships: Early Childhood and Engineering Students Teaching Math and Science Through Robotics , 2005 .

[4]  B. Davis,et al.  Engaging Minds: Changing Teaching in Complex Times , 2000 .

[5]  Matthew C. Jadud.  TeamStorms as a theory of instruction , 2000, Smc 2000 conference proceedings. 2000 ieee international conference on systems, man and cybernetics. 'cybernetics evolving to systems, humans, organizations, and their complex interactions' (cat. no.0.

[6]  Ann F. McKenna,et al.  Characterizing Design Learning: A Mixed‐Methods Study of Engineering Designers' Use of Language , 2008 .

[7]  Allison Bauerle,et al.  Toying With Technology: Bridging the Gap Between Education and Engineering , 2003 .

[8]  Morgan M. Hynes,et al.  Underwater LEGO robotics: Testing, evaluation & redesign , 2007 .

[9]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Robots in the classroom: tools for accessible education , 1999 .

[10]  Aaron Striegel,et al.  Problem-based learning in an introductory computer engineering course , 2002, 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education.

[11]  Jean Piaget,et al.  The child and reality: Problems of genetic psychology , 1973 .

[12]  André Heck,et al.  Walk like a Mathematician: An example of Authentic Education , 2003 .

[13]  L. Markert,et al.  Gender Related to Success in Science and Technology. , 1996 .

[14]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Problem-Based Learning Meets Case-Based Reasoning in the Middle-School Science Classroom: Putting Learning by Design(tm) Into Practice , 2003 .

[15]  Dimitris Alimisis.  Robotics-Enhanced Constructivist Learning : The TERECoP Project , 2007 .

[16]  Chris Rogers,et al.  Physics With Robotics - Using LEGO MINDSTORMS In High School Education , 2010, AAAI Spring Symposium: Educational Robotics and Beyond.

[17]  Barry S. Fagin,et al.  Measuring the effectiveness of robots in teaching computer science , 2003, SIGCSE.

[18]  Mike Carbonaro,et al.  Exploring Spur Gears through the use of LEGO Robotic Technology , 2007 .

[19]  David Hung,et al.  Situated Cognition and Problem-Based Learning: Implications for Learning and Instruction with Technology , 2002 .

[20]  Elizabeth R. Kazakoff,et al.  The Effect of a Classroom-Based Intensive Robotics and Programming Workshop on Sequencing Ability in Early Childhood , 2013 .

[21]  E. Mauch.  Using Technological Innovation to Improve the Problem-Solving Skills of Middle School Students: Educators' Experiences with the LEGO Mindstorms Robotic Invention System , 2001 .

[22]  Mike Carbonaro.  Using LEGO Robotics in a Project-Based Learning Environment , 2012 .

[23]  J. Creswell.  Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[24]  Fred Martin.  Kids Learning Engineering Science Using LEGO and the Programmable Brick , 1996 .

[25]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Learning by Design from Theory to Practice , 1998 .

[26]  E. Ackermann.  Piaget ’ s Constructivism , Papert ’ s Constructionism : What ’ s the difference ? , 2001 .

[27]  Moshe Barak,et al.  Robotics projects and learning concepts in science, technology and problem solving , 2009 .

[28]  George Calhoun.  Piaget's Theory of Development. , 1977 .

[29]  Allison Druin,et al.  Robots for Kids: Exploring New Technologies for Learning , 2000 .

[30]  Julie Sarama,et al.  Logo and geometry , 2001 .

[31]  Yuxin Ma,et al.  Acquisition of Physics Content Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry Skills in a Robotics Summer Camp , 2007 .

[32]  Richard T. Johnson,et al.  Robotics Competitions: The Choice Is up to You!. , 2010 .

[33]  D. Rue.  The program of studies. , 1917 .

[34]  Merredith Portsmore,et al.  Bringing Engineering to Elementary School , 2004 .

[35]  David Fortus,et al.  Design‐based science and real‐world problem‐solving , 2005 .

[36]  P. Samuels,et al.  Real and virtual robotics in mathematics education at the school–university transition , 2012 .

[37]  Moshe Barak,et al.  Using Portfolios To Enhance Creative Thinking. , 2000 .

[38]  Bradley S. Barker,et al.  Impact of Robotics and Geospatial Technology Interventions on Youth STEM Learning and Attitudes , 2010 .

[39]  Chris Rogers,et al.  Kindergarten Robotics: Using Robotics to Motivate Math, Science, and Engineering Literacy in Elementary School* , 2006 .

[40]  Anita G. Welch.  Using the TOSRA to Assess High School Students' Attitudes toward Science after Competing in the FIRST Robotics Competition: An Exploratory Study. , 2010 .

[41]  C. Atman,et al.  Considering Context: A Study of First‐Year Engineering Students , 2007 .

[42]  Gokhan Pekcan,et al.  The Effects of Engineering Modules on Student Learning in Middle School Science Classrooms , 2006 .

[43]  Stephen H. Whitehead,et al.  Relationship of Robotic Implementation on Changes in Middle School Students' Beliefs and Interest toward Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. , 2010 .

[44]  Fabiane Barreto Vavassori Benitti,et al.  Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[45]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Case Study Research in Education : A Qualitative Approach , 1991 .

[46]  C. Schunn,et al.  Engagement and Achievements: A Case Study of Design-Based Learning in a Science Context. , 2008 .

[47]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Can Social Interaction Skills Be Taught by a Social Agent? The Role of a Robotic Mediator in Autism Therapy , 2001, Cognitive Technology.

[48]  U. Wilensky,et al.  Complex Systems in Education: Scientific and Educational Importance and Implications for the Learning Sciences , 2006 .

[49]  Ellen R. Bialo,et al.  Report on the effectiveness of technology in schools , 1994 .

[50]  J. Fey,et al.  Curriculum Materials Supporting Problem‐Based Teaching , 2001 .

[51]  Blaine A. Price,et al.  Using Robotics to Motivate ‘Back Door’ Learning , 2004, Education and Information Technologies.

[52]  J. Johnson,et al.  Children, robotics, and education , 2003, Artificial Life and Robotics.

[53]  Robert T. Jiménez,et al.  Qualitative Studies in Special Education , 2005 .

[54]  B. Fiese,et al.  Qualitative inquiry: an overview for pediatric psychology. , 1998, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[55]  Albert A. Einsiedel,et al.  Developing Career Commitment in STEM-related Fields: Myths versus Reality , 2007 .

[56]  D. Oppliger.  Using FIRST LEGO League to enhance engineering education and to increase the pool of future engineering students (work in progress) , 2002, 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education.

[57]  Elizabeth Sklar,et al.  Using educational robotics to engage inner-city students with technology , 2004 .

[58]  Bradley Barker,et al.  The Impact of Robotics Competitions on Youth STEM Learning, Attitudes and 21st Century workplace Skills , 2011 .

[59]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Technological prayers: parents and children exploring robotics and values , 2000 .

[60]  Dimitris Alimisis,et al.  Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges , 2013 .

[61]  Jerry B. Weinberg,et al.  Robotics in education: Low-cost platforms for teaching integrated systems , 2003, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[62]  Ghazi Shukur,et al.  The Effect of LEGO Training on Pupils' School Performance in Mathematics, Problem Solving Ability and Attitude: Swedish Data , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[63]  Karen S. Karp,et al.  Elementary and Middle School Mathematics: Teaching Developmentally. , 2012 .

[64]  C. Steele.  A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[65]  Philip M. Sadler,et al.  Engineering Competitions in the Middle School Classroom: Key Elements in Developing Effective Design Challenges , 2000 .

[66]  M. Bers.  Blocks to Robots: Learning with Technology in the Early Childhood Classroom , 2008 .

[67]  Jean Piaget,et al.  To Understand Is to Invent , 1973 .

[68]  K. M. Hawkins,et al.  Development and Learning , 1962, Nature.

[69]  Mike Carbonaro,et al.  Scaffolding Knowledge Construction through Robotic Technology: A Middle School Case Study , 2007 .

[70]  Scott D. Johnson.  Will Our Research Hold Up Under Scrutiny , 1995 .

[71]  Michael Eisenberg,et al.  Beyond Black Boxes: Bringing Transparency and Aesthetics Back to Scientific Investigation , 2000 .

[72]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  Materials for Enabling Hands-On Robotics and STEM Education , 2007, AAAI Spring Symposium: Semantic Scientific Knowledge Integration.

[73]  J. Creswell.  Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[74]  최영한,et al.  미국 NCTM의 Principles and Standards for School Mathematics에 나타난 수학과 교수,학습의 이론 , 2002 .

[75]  Jo Boaler,et al.  Experiencing school mathematics : traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their impact on student learning , 2002 .

[76]  Ismail Marulcu,et al.  Investigating the impact of a LEGO(TM)-based, engineering-oriented curriculum compared to an inquiry-based curriculum on fifth graders' content learning of simple machines , 2010 .

[77]  M. Resnick,et al.  Programmable Bricks: Toys to Think With , 1996, IBM Syst. J..

[78]  T. P. Carpenter,et al.  Problem Solving as a Basis for Reform in Curriculum and Instruction: The Case of Mathematics , 1996 .

[79]  M. Robinson.  Robotics-Driven Activities: Can They Improve Middle School Science Learning? , 2005 .

[80]  Mike Carbonaro,et al.  Developing conceptual understanding of mechanical advantage through the use of Lego robotic technology , 2008 .

[81]  P. Hughes.  Doing Action Research in Early Childhood Studies: a step by step guide , 2009 .

[82]  Terri E. Varnado.  The Effects of a Technological Problem Solving Activity on FIRST™ LEGO™ League Participants' Problem Solving Style and Performance , 2005 .

[83]  Amy Eguchi.  Educational Robotics for Elementary School Classroom , 2007 .

[84]  Michael E. Grubbs.  Robotics Intrigue Middle School Students and Build STEM Skills , 2013 .

[85]  Richard E. Satchwell,et al.  Designing and Implementing an Integrated Mathematics, Science, and Technology Curriculum for the Middle School. , 2002 .

[86]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[87]  Sabina Jeschke,et al.  The Engineers of Tomorrow Teaching Robotics to Primary School Children , 2008 .

[88]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Project InterActions: A Multigenerational Robotic Learning Environment , 2007 .

[89]  Kate Highfield,et al.  Robotic toys as a catalyst for mathematical problem solving , 2010 .

[90]  Alanah-Rei Castledine,et al.  Lego robotics : an authentic problem solving tool? , 2011 .

[91]  D. Penner.  Cognition, Computers, and Synthetic Science: Building Knowledge and Meaning Through Modeling , 2000 .

[92]  S. Ludi.  Educational Robotics and Broadening Participation in STEM for Underrepresented Student Groups , 2012 .

[93]  Mark Gura,et al.  Lego Robotics: STEM Sport of the Mind. , 2012 .

[94]  Mike Carbonaro,et al.  Exploring Middle School Children’s Problem Solving during Robot Construction Tasks , 2004 .

[95]  Seymour Papert,et al.  The Children's Machine , 1993 .

[96]  Frank Klassner,et al.  LEGO MindStorms: not just for K-12 anymore , 2003, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[97]  Jeonghye Han,et al.  EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES ROBOT ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING , 2012 .

[98]  Scientific Challenge Award : RoboCupJunior – Learning with Educational Robotics , .

[99]  Bradley S. Barker,et al.  Robotics as Means to Increase Achievement Scores in an Informal Learning Environment , 2007 .