Ligand Depletion in vivo Modulates the Dynamic Range and Cooperativity of Signal Transduction

Biological signal transduction commonly involves cooperative interactions in the binding of ligands to their receptors. In many cases, ligand concentrations in vivo are close to the value of the dissociation constant of their receptors, resulting in the phenomenon of ligand depletion. Using examples based on rotational bias of bacterial flagellar motors and calcium binding to mammalian calmodulin, we show that ligand depletion diminishes cooperativity and broadens the dynamic range of sensitivity to the signaling ligand. As a result, the same signal transducer responds to different ranges of signal with various degrees of cooperativity according to its effective cellular concentration. Hence, results from in vitro dose-response analyses cannot be applied directly to understand signaling in vivo. Moreover, the receptor concentration is revealed to be a key element in controlling signal transduction and we propose that its modulation constitutes a new way of controlling sensitivity to signals. In addition, through an analysis of the allosteric enzyme aspartate transcarbamylase, we demonstrate that the classical Hill coefficient is not appropriate for characterizing the change in conformational state upon ligand binding to an oligomeric protein (equivalent to a dose-response curve), because it ignores the cooperativity of the conformational change for the corresponding equivalent monomers, which are generally characterized by a Hill coefficient . Therefore, we propose a new index of cooperativity based on the comparison of the properties of oligomers and their equivalent monomers.

[1]  Karen A. Fahrner,et al.  Control of direction of flagellar rotation in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  T Porumb Determination of calcium-binding constants by flow dialysis. , 1994, Analytical biochemistry.

[3]  D. Koshland The structural basis of negative cooperativity: receptors and enzymes. , 1996, Current opinion in structural biology.

[4]  H. Berg,et al.  Binding of the Escherichia coli response regulator CheY to its target measured in vivo by fluorescence resonance energy transfer , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  G. Edelman,et al.  Large-scale model of mammalian thalamocortical systems , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Nils Blüthgen,et al.  Effects of sequestration on signal transduction cascades , 2006, The FEBS journal.

[7]  Uri Alon,et al.  Response regulator output in bacterial chemotaxis , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[8]  Michele Vendruscolo,et al.  A Coupled Equilibrium Shift Mechanism in Calmodulin-Mediated Signal Transduction , 2008, Structure.

[9]  Nicolas E. Buchler,et al.  Molecular titration and ultrasensitivity in regulatory networks. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  D J DeRosier,et al.  Rotational symmetry of the C ring and a mechanism for the flagellar rotary motor. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  D. Storm,et al.  The role of calmodulin as a signal integrator for synaptic plasticity , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  C. V. Rao,et al.  The three adaptation systems of Bacillus subtilis chemotaxis. , 2008, Trends in microbiology.

[13]  J. Changeux,et al.  ON THE NATURE OF ALLOSTERIC TRANSITIONS: A PLAUSIBLE MODEL. , 1965, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  F. Dahlquist,et al.  Identification of the binding interfaces on CheY for two of its targets, the phosphatase CheZ and the flagellar switch protein fliM. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  S. W. Jones,et al.  Commentary: a plausible model. , 1999, The Journal of general physiology.

[16]  H. Qian Cooperativity and specificity in enzyme kinetics: a single-molecule time-based perspective. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[17]  J. Changeux,et al.  Allosteric Mechanisms of Signal Transduction , 2005, Science.

[18]  D. Rujescu,et al.  Systems biology and complex neurobehavioral traits. , 2008, Pharmacopsychiatry.

[19]  Nicolas Le Novère,et al.  The long journey to a Systems Biology of neuronal function , 2007, BMC Systems Biology.

[20]  S. Edelstein,et al.  Cooperative interactions of hemoglobin. , 1975, Annual review of biochemistry.

[21]  Ted L. Anderson,et al.  On the Application of R -Curves and Maximum Load Toughness to Structures , 1988 .

[22]  K. Weber New Structural Model of E. coli Aspartate Transcarbamylase and the Amino-acid Sequence of the Regulatory Polypeptide Chain , 1968, Nature.

[23]  Ned S. Wingreen,et al.  Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli: A Molecular Model for Robust Precise Adaptation , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[24]  E. Miyamoto,et al.  The distribution of calcineurin in rat brain by light and electron microscopic immunohistochemistry and enzyme-immunoassay , 1986, Brain Research.

[25]  D. Clapham,et al.  Calcium signaling , 1995, Cell.

[26]  A Karlin,et al.  On the application of "a plausible model" of allosteric proteins to the receptor for acetylcholine. , 1967, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  K. Sobue,et al.  Quantitative determinations of calmodulin in the supernatant and particulate fractions of mammalian tissues. , 1982, Journal of biochemistry.

[28]  N Le Novère,et al.  Conformational spread in a ring of proteins: a stochastic approach to allostery. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  J. Gerhart,et al.  Allosteric interactions in aspartate transcarbamylase. II. Evidence for different conformational states of the protein in the presence and absence of specific ligands. , 1968, Biochemistry.

[30]  J. Gerhart,et al.  The purification of aspartate transcarbamylase of Escherichia coli and separation of its protein subunits. , 1967, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[31]  H K Schachman,et al.  Can a simple model account for the allosteric transition of aspartate transcarbamoylase? , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[32]  H. Markram The Blue Brain Project , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[33]  I. Zhulin,et al.  Bacterial Signaling and Motility: Sure Bets , 2008, Journal of bacteriology.

[34]  J P Changeux,et al.  Structural differences in the two agonist binding sites of the Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptor revealed by time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[35]  S. Edelstein,et al.  An expanded two-state allosteric model for interactions of human hemoglobin A with nonsaturating concentrations of 2,3-diphosphoglycerate. , 1987, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[36]  J. Marcinkeviciene,et al.  A pre-steady state analysis of ligand binding to human glucokinase: evidence for a preexisting equilibrium. , 2007, Biochemistry.

[37]  Melanie I. Stefan,et al.  An allosteric model of calmodulin explains differential activation of PP2B and CaMKII , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  V. Sourjik,et al.  Spatial organization of the bacterial chemotaxis system. , 2006, Current opinion in microbiology.

[39]  Teruyuki Nishimura,et al.  Structural basis for allosteric regulation of the monomeric allosteric enzyme human glucokinase. , 2004, Structure.

[40]  S. Swillens Interpretation of binding curves obtained with high receptor concentrations: practical aid for computer analysis. , 1995, Molecular pharmacology.

[41]  W Ferdinand,et al.  The interpretation of non-hyperbolic rate curves for two-substrate enzymes. A possible mechanism for phosphofructokinase. , 1966, The Biochemical journal.

[42]  A. Hill,et al.  The possible effects of the aggregation of the molecules of haemoglobin on its dissociation curves , 1910 .

[43]  D. Koshland,et al.  An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  R. Barrett,et al.  Ligand dissociation constants from competition binding assays: errors associated with ligand depletion. , 1987, Molecular pharmacology.

[45]  W. Lipscomb,et al.  Escherichia coli aspartate transcarbamoylase: the molecular basis for a concerted allosteric transition. , 1990, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[46]  E. Ghelardi,et al.  FlhF, a signal recognition particle-like GTPase, is involved in the regulation of flagellar arrangement, motility behaviour and protein secretion in Bacillus cereus. , 2007, Microbiology.

[47]  W. Lipscomb,et al.  Crystallographic Determination of Symmetry of Aspartate Transcarbamylase , 1968, Nature.

[48]  W. Lipscomb Aspartate transcarbamylase from Escherichia coli: activity and regulation. , 1994, Advances in enzymology and related areas of molecular biology.

[49]  J P Changeux,et al.  Allosteric interactions in aspartate transcarbamylase. 3. Interpretation of experimental data in terms of the model of Monod, Wyman, and Changeux. , 1968, Biochemistry.

[50]  Nils Blüthgen,et al.  Quantitative analysis of ultrasensitive responses , 2005, The FEBS journal.

[51]  James N. Weiss The Hill equation revisited: uses and misuses , 1997, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[52]  Melanie I. Stefan,et al.  BMC Systems Biology , 2022 .

[53]  C. Koch,et al.  The dynamics of free calcium in dendritic spines in response to repetitive synaptic input. , 1987, Science.

[54]  L. Steinman,et al.  Systems biology and its application to the understanding of neurological diseases , 2009, Annals of neurology.

[55]  Patrice Vachette,et al.  Direct observation in solution of a preexisting structural equilibrium for a mutant of the allosteric aspartate transcarbamoylase , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  Substrate Competition as a Source of Ultrasensitivity in the Inactivation of Wee1 , 2007, Cell.

[57]  T. Duke,et al.  Conformational spread: the propagation of allosteric states in large multiprotein complexes. , 2004, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[58]  J. Gerhart,et al.  The enzymology of control by feedback inhibition. , 1962, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[59]  Ned S Wingreen,et al.  Variable sizes of Escherichia coli chemoreceptor signaling teams , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[60]  S. Leibler,et al.  An ultrasensitive bacterial motor revealed by monitoring signaling proteins in single cells. , 2000, Science.

[61]  J P Changeux,et al.  On the nature of allosteric transitions: implications of non-exclusive ligand binding. , 1966, Journal of molecular biology.