Contemporary methods of designing and testing mechanical vehicles are based on simulation techniques that require the use of precise models of vertical and horizontal dynamics and sequences of random events occurring in road traffic conditions. This problem is relevant to the optimization of vehicles with internal combustion engines, electric vehicles (EV) and hybrid electric vehicles (HEV). To select the most appropriate drive system architecture for a particular vehicle class and driving cycle, it is necessary to optimize the size of components according to their cost functions, such as the lowest 2 CO emissions, the lowest weight, fuel savings or any combination of these attributes in the architecture [1, 7, 9 and 18]. Regardless of the simulation technique used: quasi-static using a “Backward-facing” vehicle model or a dynamic simulation with a “Forward-facing” model, understanding of the representative driving cycle is essential. In the first case, for an open-loop system, the time series of speed is imposed on the input of the vehicle model in order to calculate rpm and torque on the wheels. In a closed-loop vehicle model, on the other hand, the driving cycle is a setpoint for the driver block, which generates a suitable engine torque. The time and cost constraints associated with the design and testing of various possible vehicle architectures require methods of driving cycle synthesis that can meet the modelling and simulation requirements of automotive engineers throughout the R&D process. It is not possible to optimize the parameters and gradually increase the autonomy of the vehicles based on standard driving cycles, and such optimization cannot prevent “cycle beating”. To ensure that the synthesized time series based on the collected databases are representative, it is necessary to use algorithms adopting techniques based on stochastic and statistical models [6, 19]. To define the equivalence criteria, the synthesis process is concluded with a verification of the results, i.e. each generated cycle, through statistical analysis in the time or frequency domain. A combination of multiple criteria is frequently used [2, 4]. The methods of driving cycles construction require quantization of traffic parameters. Depending on their function (emissions estimation, fuel consumption estimation or traffic engineering, etc.), the defined states can be synthesized for micro-trips, segments, heterogeneous classes or modal cycles [17]. Micro-trips are driving models between stops including periods of inactivity. Traffic signals and overloads contribute to “stop-go” driving patterns, and result in increased fuel PuchAlski A, komorskA i, ŚlęzAk m, NiewczAs A. synthesis of naturalistic vehicle driving cycles using the markov chain monte carlo method. eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc – maintenance and reliability 2020; 22 (2): 316–322, http://dx.doi.org/10.17531/ein.2020.2.14.
[1]
Peter Mukli,et al.
Multifractal formalism by enforcing the universal behavior of scaling functions
,
2015
.
[2]
A. Puchalski,et al.
Multifractal Nature of Diesel Engine Rattle Noise in Vehicle
,
2017
.
[3]
Yi Yin,et al.
Multiscale multifractal detrended cross-correlation analysis of traffic flow
,
2015
.
[4]
Zoran Filipi,et al.
Synthesis of real-world driving cycles using stochastic process and statistical methodology
,
2011
.
[5]
Ashish Verma,et al.
A novel methodology for construction of driving cycles for Indian cities
,
2018,
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.
[6]
Andrzej Puchalski,et al.
A generalised entropy in multifractal time signals analysis of mechanical vibration
,
2018
.
[7]
M Maarten Steinbuch,et al.
Effects of using synthesized driving cycles on vehicle fuel consumption
,
2017
.
[8]
Andrzej Puchalski,et al.
Multifractal analysis vehicle’s in-use speed profile for application in driving cycles
,
2018
.
[9]
Meifeng Dai,et al.
Multifractal and singularity analysis of highway volume data
,
2014
.
[10]
Margaret O'Mahony,et al.
Development of a driving cycle to evaluate the energy economy of electric vehicles in urban areas
,
2016
.
[11]
Stephan Rinderknecht,et al.
Stochastic Synthesis of Representative and Multidimensional Driving Cycles
,
2018
.
[12]
Andrzej Puchalski,et al.
Binomial multifractal features of worldwide harmonized light duty vehicles test cycle
,
2017
.
[13]
Zoran Filipi,et al.
Naturalistic drive cycle synthesis for pickup trucks.
,
2015,
Journal of safety research.
[14]
Huei Peng,et al.
Synthesis of Realistic Driving Cycles With High Accuracy and Computational Speed, Including Slope Information
,
2016,
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.
[15]
Pengjian Shang,et al.
Detecting long-range correlations of traffic time series with multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis
,
2008
.
[16]
Erik Frisk,et al.
Generation of Equivalent Driving Cycles Using Markov Chains and Mean Tractive Force Components
,
2014
.
[17]
Man Zhang,et al.
High-Efficiency Driving Cycle Generation Using a Markov Chain Evolution Algorithm
,
2019,
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.
[18]
Theo Hofman,et al.
Driving-Cycle-Aware Energy Management of Hybrid Electric Vehicles Using a Three-Dimensional Markov Chain Model
,
2019,
Automotive Innovation.