Robust Classifiers for Data Reduced via Random Projections

The computational cost for most classification algorithms is dependent on the dimensionality of the input samples. As the dimensionality could be high in many cases, particularly those associated with image classification, reducing the dimensionality of the data becomes a necessity. The traditional dimensionality reduction methods are data dependent, which poses certain practical problems. Random projection (RP) is an alternative dimensionality reduction method that is data independent and bypasses these problems. The nearest neighbor classifier has been used with the RP method in classification problems. To obtain higher recognition accuracy, this study looks at the robustness of RP dimensionality reduction for several recently proposed classifiers - sparse classifier (SC), group SC (along with their fast versions), and the nearest subspace classifier. Theoretical proofs are offered regarding the robustness of these classifiers to RP. The theoretical results are confirmed by experimental evaluations.

[1]  J. Yellott Spectral analysis of spatial sampling by photoreceptors: Topological disorder prevents aliasing , 1982, Vision Research.

[2]  Mark A. Z. Dippé,et al.  Antialiasing through stochastic sampling , 1985, SIGGRAPH.

[3]  Y. C. Pati,et al.  Orthogonal matching pursuit: recursive function approximation with applications to wavelet decomposition , 1993, Proceedings of 27th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[4]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  Sparse channel estimation via matching pursuit with application to equalization , 2002, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[5]  Robert P. W. Duin,et al.  Bagging, Boosting and the Random Subspace Method for Linear Classifiers , 2002, Pattern Analysis & Applications.

[6]  Dmitriy Fradkin,et al.  Experiments with random projections for machine learning , 2003, KDD '03.

[7]  David Zhang,et al.  An improved LDA approach , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[8]  Sabine Süsstrunk,et al.  Linear demosaicing inspired by the human visual system , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Simultaneous Variable Selection , 2005, Technometrics.

[10]  George Bebis,et al.  Face recognition experiments with random projection , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[11]  P. Sinha,et al.  Face Recognition by Humans: , 2005 .

[12]  H. Zou,et al.  Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net , 2005 .

[13]  Felix J. Herrmann,et al.  Seismic denoising with nonuniformly sampled curvelets , 2006, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[14]  D. Donoho For most large underdetermined systems of linear equations the minimal 𝓁1‐norm solution is also the sparsest solution , 2006 .

[15]  J. Haupt,et al.  Compressive Sampling for Signal Classification , 2006, 2006 Fortieth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[16]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies? , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[17]  David L. Donoho,et al.  Sparse Solution Of Underdetermined Linear Equations By Stagewise Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2006 .

[18]  Pawan Sinha,et al.  Face Recognition by Humans: Nineteen Results All Computer Vision Researchers Should Know About , 2006, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[19]  M. Yuan,et al.  Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables , 2006 .

[20]  Tat-Jun Chin,et al.  Incremental Kernel Principal Component Analysis , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[21]  Stephen A. Billings,et al.  Feature Subset Selection and Ranking for Data Dimensionality Reduction , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[22]  Robert D. Nowak,et al.  Compressive Sampling for Signal Detection , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - ICASSP '07.

[23]  Hakan Cevikalp,et al.  The Kernel Common Vector Method: A Novel Nonlinear Subspace Classifier for Pattern Recognition , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[24]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  The smashed filter for compressive classification and target recognition , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[25]  Constantin Zopounidis,et al.  Additive Support Vector Machines for Pattern Classification , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[26]  T. Blumensath,et al.  On the Difference Between Orthogonal Matching Pursuit and Orthogonal Least Squares , 2007 .

[27]  Pong C. Yuen,et al.  Face Recognition by Regularized Discriminant Analysis , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[28]  Xudong Jiang,et al.  Eigenfeature Regularization and Extraction in Face Recognition , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[29]  Ewa Skubalska-Rafajlowicz,et al.  Random Projection RBF Nets for Multidimensional Density Estimation , 2008, Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci..

[30]  Pong C. Yuen,et al.  Incremental Linear Discriminant Analysis for Face Recognition , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[31]  Jing Peng,et al.  Discriminant Learning Analysis , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[32]  Mark W. Schmidt,et al.  GROUP SPARSITY VIA LINEAR-TIME PROJECTION , 2008 .

[33]  Anna Scaglione,et al.  Application of sparse signal recovery to pilot-assisted channel estimation , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[34]  Nojun Kwak,et al.  Principal Component Analysis Based on L1-Norm Maximization , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[35]  P. Bühlmann,et al.  The group lasso for logistic regression , 2008 .

[36]  David Masip,et al.  Boosted Online Learning for Face Recognition , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[37]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Robust Recovery of Signals From a Structured Union of Subspaces , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[38]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Block-sparsity: Coherence and efficient recovery , 2008, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[39]  Allen Y. Yang,et al.  Robust Face Recognition via Sparse Representation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[40]  Junzhou Huang,et al.  The Benefit of Group Sparsity , 2009 .

[41]  Rachel Ward,et al.  Compressed Sensing With Cross Validation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[42]  Deanna Needell,et al.  Uniform Uncertainty Principle and Signal Recovery via Regularized Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2007, Found. Comput. Math..

[43]  Rabab Kreidieh Ward,et al.  Classification via group sparsity promoting regularization , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[44]  Rabab Kreidieh Ward,et al.  Improved Group Sparse Classifier , 2010, Pattern Recognit. Lett..