Topography of the Human Ulnar Nerve for Mounting a Neuro-Prosthesis with Sensory Feedback

This article presents the performed experimental measurements for connecting a sensory feedback neuro-prosthesis to the peripheral nervous system of a patient with forearm amputation. The experiments focused on the ring finger motion�s neuron control in the forearm prosthesis and on the neural path transmission of the tactile sensation coming from the pressure sensors fitted on the small finger phalanges (F5). For the ring finger, both motor control and sensory feedback are transmitted through the ulnar nerve�s motor axons, respectively by the ulnar nerve�s sensory axons. At the beginning of this study, the topography of the ulnar nerve has been performed, in order to identify the axons by which motor controls are transmitted for the small finger movement (F5) and the axons through which small finger (F5) tactile information is transmitted. A Carl Zeiss S8 electronic microscope was used to analyze the ulnar nerve�s transverse sections for an anonymous patient. Cross sections in the ulnar nerve have been examined, from the tip of the small finger (F5) to the shoulder area. The separately mappings of motor and sensory axons from the ulnar nerve at the wrist�s level and at the elbow�s level were then performed. 3D modeling was performed using CATIA software solution for mapping the axon topography in the ulnar nerve. By means of the ulnar nerve�s 3D topographic map, the optimal place for the implantation of both motor control electrodes and small finger (F5) sensory feedback electrodes were identified in the particular case of a patient with forearm amputation. Subsequently, by surgical procedures, experimental implantation of a motor control electrode for the small finger (F5) from a neuro-prosthesis was performed as well as a sensory feedback electrode for the same finger. For the next two weeks, measurements were made while the patient has been learning to move the small finger (F5) of the neuro-prosthesis and feel the tactile sensation from this finger. After these two weeks the electrodes were extracted from the patient�s stump by surgery.

[1]  G. Stefan,et al.  Virtual environment for robots interfaces design and testing , 2005, CAS 2005 Proceedings. 2005 International Semiconductor Conference, 2005..

[2]  Monica Dascalu,et al.  Intelligent interfaces for locomotory prosthesis , 2009, 2009 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[3]  S. Micera,et al.  On the identification of sensory information from mixed nerves by using single-channel cuff electrodes , 2010, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[4]  T Stieglitz,et al.  Use of an Experimentally Derived Leadfield in the Peripheral Nerve Pathway Discrimination Problem , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  J. Millán,et al.  Personalized Neuroprosthetics , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[6]  Christian Ethier,et al.  Intrafascicular stimulation of monkey arm nerves evokes coordinated grasp and sensory responses. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Eugenio Guglielmelli,et al.  Invasive neural interfaces: the perspective of the surgeon. , 2014, The Journal of surgical research.

[8]  P. van de Heyning,et al.  Upper-airway stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Chris Roast,et al.  Exploring virtual reality and prosthetic training , 2015, 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).

[10]  Xavier Navarro,et al.  Fascicular Topography of the Human Median Nerve for Neuroprosthetic Surgery , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[11]  Ozlem Ulger,et al.  The importance of rehabilitation concerning upper extremity amputees: A Systematic review , 2016, Pakistan journal of medical sciences.

[12]  Monica Dascălu Politehnica Cellular Automata Hardware Implementations-an Overview , 2017 .

[13]  I. Stoica,et al.  Tactile Feedback Experiments for Forearm Prosthesis with Myoelectric Control , 2018 .