Microbiological pattern of postcesarean wound infection at Federal Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki

Background: Cesarean section is one of the most common obstetric surgeries done in women of reproductive age group. Postcesarean wound infection is a worrisome occurrence despite the observation of aseptic techniques and administration of potent antibiotics. Common offending organisms include Staphylococcus species, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, and Pseudomonas species. Objective: The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence, risk factors and common bacterial pathogens for surgical site infection (SSI), following cesarean section. Materials and Methods: A prospective surveillance was conducted at Federal Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, from July 2011 to August 2012 using a semi -structured questionnaire. The following risk factors were studied, age, parity, booking status, type of cesarean section, duration of labor and length of membrane rupture. Microbiologic culture of those that had wound infection was done. IBM ® SPSS ® statistical software 2007 version 16 was used for statistical analysis. Results: The prevalence of wound infection was 7.0%. There were 1301 deliveries out of which 399 (30.7%) had cesarean section, and 28 (7.0%) had wound infection following cesarean delivery. Booking status was the only factor that significantly influenced the occurrence of wound infection (P < 0.01). Staphylococcus aureus and Citrobacter spp. were the common organisms isolated. Conclusion: The prevalence of SSI following cesarean section was high and S. aureus and Citrobacter spp. were the common pathogens isolated.

[1]  M. Olsen,et al.  Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection After Low Transverse Cesarean Section , 2008, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[2]  P. Mitt,et al.  Surgical-Site Infections Following Cesarean Section in an Estonian University Hospital: Postdischarge Surveillance and analysis of Risk Factors , 2005, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[3]  F. Dare Burst abdomen following Caesarean Section: a prevalence surgical complication , 2004 .

[4]  B. Carbonne,et al.  [Surgical site infections after cesarean section: results of a five-year prospective surveillance]. , 2004, Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction.

[5]  O. Ezechi,et al.  Caesarean Morbidity and Mortality in a Private Hospital in Lagos, Nigeria , 2002 .

[6]  E. Orji,et al.  Uncomplicated Caesarean section: is prolonged hospital stay necessary? , 2000, East African medical journal.

[7]  C. Chama,et al.  Caesarean morbidity and mortality at Maiduguri, Nigeria. , 2000, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[8]  O. Ezechi,et al.  Socioeconomic barriers to safe motherhood among booked patients in rural Nigerian communities. , 2000, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[9]  A. Adeyemi,et al.  Decision-caesarean delivery interval in a Nigerian university hospital: implications for maternal morbidity and mortality. , 1999, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[10]  A. Coker,et al.  A Review of Nosocomial Infection at the Lagos university Teaching Hospital: Problems and Strategies for Improvement. , 1998 .

[11]  C. Nice,et al.  A prospective audit of wound infection rates after caesarean section in five West Yorkshire hospitals. , 1996, The Journal of hospital infection.

[12]  P. Litta,et al.  Risk factors for complicating infections after cesarean section. , 1995, Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology.

[13]  Y. Lake,et al.  Risk Factors for Wound Infection Following Caesarean Section , 1994, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[14]  N. Sivalingam,et al.  The role of prophylactic antibiotics in caesarean section--a randomised trial. , 1992, The Medical journal of Malaysia.

[15]  A. K. Ako-Nai,et al.  Sources of intra-operative bacterial colonization of clean surgical wounds and subsequent post-operative wound infection in a Nigerian hospital. , 1992, East African medical journal.

[16]  U. Osime,et al.  A prospective randomised comparison of simple ligation and stump invagination during appendicectomy in Africans. , 1988, JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association.

[17]  F. Okonofua,et al.  Yearly trends in caesarean section and cesarean mortality at Ile-Ife, Nigeria. , 1988, Tropical journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[18]  J. Thompson,et al.  Wound infection after caesarean section. , 1985, Nursing times.

[19]  W. Ott Primary Cesarean Section: Factors Related to Postpartum Infection , 1981, Obstetrics and gynecology.