Smart community networks: self‐directed team effectiveness in action

Purpose – The purpose of this research paper is to study the governance of smart/intelligent community projects through an analysis of the level of team effectiveness of collaborative telecommunication networks.Design/methodology/approach – The research is based on a census of all Canadian smart community projects. A high‐performance team effectiveness instrument identified, through a performance score, whether smart community teams (board of directors or steering committees) are functioning as high‐performance teams. A total of 76 networks were found and 28 responded. Each network is managed by three to nine board members and therefore the researcher received 72 valid questionnaires.Findings – Teams, in highly innovative and transformational environments, and involving a variety of community stakeholders, face more challenges in their ability to perform as a high‐performance team. They tend to perform reasonably well in assigning roles and goals, but are having more difficulty managing feedback, establis...

[1]  C. N. Cofer,et al.  Motivation: Theory and research. , 1964 .

[2]  H. D. Dewhirst,et al.  Relationships between goal clarity, participation in goal setting, and personality characteristics on job satisfaction in a scientific organization. , 1976, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  D. Tapscott Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation , 1984 .

[4]  R. Keller,et al.  A test of the path-goal theory of leadership with need for clarity as a moderator in research and development organizations , 1989 .

[5]  Glenn M. Parker,et al.  Team Players and Teamwork: The New Competitive Business Strategy , 1990 .

[6]  W. B. Hall,et al.  Personality consistency: Eminent architects 25 years later , 1991 .

[7]  Richard S. Wellins,et al.  Empowered Teams: Creating Self-Directed Work Groups That Improve Quality, Productivity, and Participation , 1991 .

[8]  Jon R. Katzenbach,et al.  The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization , 1992 .

[9]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Managing 21st century network organizations , 1992 .

[10]  C. E. Smith The Merlin Factor: Leadership and Strategic Intent , 1994 .

[11]  J. Abra,et al.  Collaboration in creative work: An initiative for investigation , 1994 .

[12]  R. Keller ‘Transformational’ Leaders Make a Difference , 1995 .

[13]  Charles C. Manz,et al.  Leadership for Self-Managing Work Teams: A Typology and Integrative Model , 1995 .

[14]  K. Dunbar HOW SCIENTISTS REALLY REASON: SCIENTIFIC REASONING IN REAL-WORLD LABORATORIES , 1995 .

[15]  Dimitrina S. Dimitrova,et al.  Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community , 1996 .

[16]  Barry Wellman,et al.  For a social network analysis of computer networks: a sociological perspective on collaborative work and virtual community , 1996, SIGCPR '96.

[17]  G. Dobbins,et al.  Collectivistic orientation in teams: an individual and group-level analysis , 1997 .

[18]  Frances Cairncross,et al.  The death of distance , 1997 .

[19]  S. Borgatti,et al.  A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms , 1997 .

[20]  C. Huxham Creating Collaborative Advantage , 1997 .

[21]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Motivation and creativity. , 1998 .

[22]  P. Senge The leader's new work: Building learning organizations. , 1998 .

[23]  Chris Skelcher,et al.  The Dynamics of Multi‐organizational Partnerships: an Analysis of Changing Modes of Governance , 1998 .

[24]  A. Creighton-Zollar,et al.  Diverse Self-Directed Work Teams: Developing Strategic Initiatives for 21st Century Organizations , 1998 .

[25]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  The Information Society: An International , 2003 .

[26]  Susan A. Wheelan Creating Effective Teams: A Guide for Members and Leaders. Second Edition. , 1999 .

[27]  B. Winston,et al.  Servant Leadership: Setting the Stage for Empirical Research , 1999 .

[28]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  The driving forces in the virtual society , 1999, CACM.

[29]  Mohsen Attaran,et al.  Design and implementation of self‐directed process teams , 1999 .

[30]  Elliot E. Entin,et al.  Adaptive Team Coordination , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[31]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  On becoming virtual: the driving forces and arrangements , 1999, SIGCPR '99.

[32]  Vittorio Chiesa,et al.  Differences and similarities in managing technological collaborations in research, development and manufacturing: a case study , 2000 .

[33]  D. Tesone Leadership And Motivating Missions: A Model For Organizations From Science Literature , 2000 .

[34]  P. Northouse Leadership: Theory and Practice , 2000 .

[35]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  The city in the information and communication technology age: a comparative study on path dependecy , 2001 .

[36]  M. Mumford,et al.  Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships , 2002 .

[37]  M. Hitt,et al.  The Essence of Strategic Leadership: Managing Human and Social Capital , 2002 .

[38]  Matthew C. Makel,et al.  Growing up digital , 2020, Transformative Digital Humanities.