Handbook of Automated Essay Evaluation Current Applications and New Directions

Carl Whithaus, Foreword. M. D. Shermis, J. Burstein, S. A. Bursky, Introduction to Automated Essay Evaluation. N. Elliot, A. Klobucar, Automated Essay Evaluation and the Teaching of Writing. S. C. Weigle, ESL Writing and Automated Essay Evaluation. J. Burstein, J. Tetreault, N. Madnani, The E-rater(R) Automated Essay Scoring System. P. W. Foltz, L. A. Streeter, K. E. Lochbaum, T. K Landauer, Implementation and Applications of the Intelligent Essay Assessor. M. T. Schultz, The Intellimetric(TM) Automated Essay Scoring Engine - A Review and an Application to Chinese Essay Scoring. C. S. Rich, M. C. Schneider, J. M. D'Brot, Applications of Automated Essay Evaluation in West Virginia. E. Mayfield, C. Penstein Rose, LightSIDE: Open Source Machine Learning for Text. C. Brew, C. Leacock, c-rater: Automated Short Answer Scoring at Educational Testing Service. D. M. Williamson, Probable Cause: Developing Warrants for Automated Scoring of Essays. Y. Attali, Validity and Reliability of Automated Essay Scoring. K. L. K. Koskey, M. D. Shermis, Scaling and Norming for Automated Essay Scoring. B.Bridgeman, Human Ratings and AEE. S. M. Lottridge, E. M. Schulz, H. C. Mitzel, Using Automated Scoring to Monitor Reader Performance and Detect Reader Drift in Essay Scoring. M. Gamon, M. Chodorow, C.Leacock, J.Tetreault, Grammatical Error Detection in Automatic Essay Scoring and Feedback. J. Burstein, J. Tetreault, M. Chodorow, D. Blanchard, S. Andreyev, Automated Evaluation of Discourse Coherence Quality in Essay Writing. Jill Burstein, B. Beigman-Klebanov, N. Madnani, A. Faulkner, Automated Sentiment Analysis for Essay Evaluation. P. Deane, Covering the Construct: An approach to Automated Essay Scoring Motivated by a Socio-cognitive Framework for Defining Literacy Skills. M. D. Shermis, B. Hamner, Contrasting State-of-the-Art Automated Scoring of Essays. K. Hakuta, The Policy Turn in Current Education Reform: The Common Core State Standards and Its Linguistic Challenges and Opportunities.

[1]  J. Emig.  The Composing Processes of Twelfth Graders , 1971 .

[2]  S. Freedman,et al.  An Analysis of Readers' Responses to Essays , 1977 .

[3]  J. Hayes,et al.  A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing , 1981, College Composition & Communication.

[4]  T. Homburg.  Holistic Evaluation of ESL Compositions: Can It Be Validated Objectively? , 1984 .

[5]  H. Marsh,et al.  The Assessment Of Writing Effectiveness: A Multidimensional Perspective , 1987 .

[6]  Alister Cumming,et al.  WRITING EXPERTISE AND SECOND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY , 1989 .

[7]  M. Kane.  The Argument-Based Approach to Validation , 1990 .

[8]  Alister Cumming,et al.  Expertise in evaluating second language compositions , 1990 .

[9]  Janet Lane,et al.  Writing Clearly: Responding to ESL Compositions. , 1993 .

[10]  Tony Silva.  Toward an Understanding of the Distinct Nature of L2 Writing: The ESL Research and Its Implications , 1993 .

[11]  J. Connor-Linton.  Looking Behind the Curtain: What Do L2 Composition Ratings Really Mean? , 1995 .

[12]  John Truscott,et al.  Review Article The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes , 1996 .

[13]  H. Chow.  "Holistic assessment : what goes on in the raters' minds?" , 1997 .

[14]  Braj B. Kachru.  World Englishes and English-Using Communities , 1997, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[15]  Martin Chodorow,et al.  Automated Essay Scoring for Nonnative English Speakers , 1999 .

[16]  A. Herrington,et al.  What Happens When Machines Read Our Students' Writing? , 2001 .

[17]  J. Larios,et al.  A Critical Examination of L2 Writing Process Research , 2002 .

[18]  Michelle G. Paterno.  Responding to Student Writing , 2002 .

[19]  Dana R. Ferris,et al.  Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing , 2002 .

[20]  T. Lumley.  Assessment criteria in a large-scale writing test: what do they really mean to the raters? , 2002 .

[21]  Jill Burstein,et al.  The E-rater® scoring engine: Automated essay scoring with natural language processing. , 2003 .

[22]  Jill Burstein,et al.  Automated Essay Scoring : A Cross-disciplinary Perspective , 2003 .

[23]  Jan Frodesen,et al.  Exploring the Dynamics of Second Language Writing: Grammar and the ESL writing class , 2003 .

[24]  E. B. Page.  Project Essay Grade: PEG. , 2003 .

[25]  Jill Burstein,et al.  AUTOMATED ESSAY SCORING WITH E‐RATER® V.2.0 , 2004 .

[26]  Cynthia L. Selfe,et al.  CCCC Position Statement on Teaching, Learning, and Assessing Writing in Digital Environments , 2004, College Composition & Communication.

[27]  Sara Cushing Weigle,et al.  Integrating reading and writing in a competency test for non-native speakers of English , 2004 .

[28]  Xiaoye You.  “The choice made from no choice”: English writing instruction in a Chinese University , 2004 .

[29]  Julie Cheville,et al.  Automated Scoring Technologies and the Rising Influence of Error. , 2004 .

[30]  Andrea Everard,et al.  Does spell-checking software need a warning label? , 2005, CACM.

[31]  S. Weigle.  Second Language Writing Expertise , 2005 .

[32]  Rod Ellis,et al.  Principles of instructed language learning , 2005 .

[33]  Jessica Williams,et al.  TEACHING WRITING IN SECOND AND FOREIGN LANGUAGE CLASSROOMS , 2004, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[34]  John Truscott,et al.  The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately , 2007 .

[35]  Ying Zheng,et al.  Test review: College English Test (CET) in China: , 2008 .

[36]  Chi-Fen Emily Chen,et al.  Beyond the Design of Automated Writing Evaluation: Pedagogical Practices and Perceived Learning Effectiveness in EFL Writing Classes. , 2008 .

[37]  Star medzerian Vanguri,et al.  Conference on College Composition and Communication , 2008 .

[38]  D. Borsboom.  Educational Measurement (4th ed.) , 2009 .

[39]  W. Condon.  Looking beyond Judging and Ranking: Writing Assessment as a Generative Practice. , 2009 .

[40]  J. Laborda,et al.  Building a Validity Argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language , 2009 .

[41]  N. Verhelst,et al.  Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment , 2009 .

[42]  Joel R. Tetreault,et al.  The utility of article and preposition error correction systems for English language learners: Feedback and assessment , 2010 .

[43]  Xiaoming Xi.  Automated scoring and feedback systems: Where are we and where are we heading? , 2010 .

[44]  Deborah J. Crusan.  Assessment in the Second Language Writing Classroom , 2010 .

[45]  Sara Cushing Weigle.  Validation of automated scores of TOEFL iBT tasks against non-test indicators of writing ability , 2010 .

[46]  C. Chapelle,et al.  The promise of NLP and speech processing technologies in language assessment , 2010 .

[47]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Utility in a Fallible Tool: A Multi-Site Case Study of Automated Writing Evaluation. , 2010 .

[48]  Paige Ware.  Computer‐Generated Feedback on Student Writing , 2011 .

[49]  Elena Cotos,et al.  Potential of Automated Writing Evaluation Feedback. , 2011 .

[50]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Understanding expert ratings of essay quality: Coh-Metrix analyses of first and second language writing , 2011 .

[51]  Megan J. Montee,et al.  Raters’ Perceptions of Textual Borrowing in Integrated Writing Tasks , 2012 .

[52]  E. Steendam.  Measuring Writing: Recent Insights into Theory, Methodology and Practices , 2012 .

[53]  Philip M. McCarthy,et al.  The Gramulator: A Tool to Identify Differential Linguistic Features of Correlative Text Types , 2012 .

[54]  Paul Deane,et al.  On the relation between automated essay scoring and modern views of the writing construct , 2013 .

[55]  Bedrettin Yazan,et al.  Teaching English as an International Language , 2013 .