Social Presence: Influence on Bidders in Internet Auctions

We study effects of social processes' representation in Internet auctions using laboratory experiments. The inability of participating parties to learn about each others' bidding behaviour and to extend their comprehension beyond what is presented in auction sites today decreases the social influence compared to traditional face‐to‐face auctions. This reality is about to change since new interaction and collaboration technologies are emerging. A conceptual model used here associates social factors influencing bidders and the resulting bidding behaviour. We utilized an online auction simulation framework that facilitates transmission of social cues during an auction and conducted empirical study of behaviour in both English and Dutch auctions. We found that social presence, expressed by virtual presence and interpersonal information, significantly affects both bidding behaviour and market outcomes.

[1]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[2]  Charles E. Miller,et al.  Group Discussion and Judgment , 1983 .

[3]  Atanu R. Sinha,et al.  Auctions: Research Opportunities in Marketing , 2002 .

[4]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[5]  R. Spears,et al.  Social influence and the influence of the 'social' in computer-mediated communication. , 1992 .

[6]  John H. Miller,et al.  Auctions with Artificial Adaptive Agents , 1995 .

[7]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group decision making and communication technology , 1992 .

[8]  Steven P. Brown,et al.  Effects of Brand Awareness on Choice for a Common, Repeat-Purchase Product , 1990 .

[9]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[10]  T. Postmes,et al.  The Formation of Group Norms in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2000 .

[11]  Hong-Youl Ha,et al.  The Effects of Consumer Risk Perception on Pre-purchase Information in Online Auctions: Brand, Word-of-Mouth, and Customized Information , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[12]  T. Postmes,et al.  A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Phenomena , 1995 .

[13]  Wendy A. Kellogg,et al.  Socially translucent systems: social proxies, persistent conversation, and the design of “babble” , 1999, CHI '99.

[14]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence , 2006 .

[15]  B. Latané.  The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[16]  V. Smith,et al.  The Winner's Curse and Public Information in Common Value Auctions: Comment , 2007 .

[17]  Karrie Karahalios,et al.  Visualizing Conversation , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[18]  J. Jacoby,et al.  Consumer Behavior , 2024 .

[19]  Thomas D. Jeitschko,et al.  Learning in Sequential Auctions , 1997 .

[20]  Rami Zwick,et al.  Internet auctions - popular and professional literature review , 2000 .

[21]  T. Postmes,et al.  Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? , 1998 .

[22]  J. Kagel,et al.  Winner’s Curse , 2014 .

[23]  David H. Reiley,et al.  Pennies from Ebay: The Determinants of Price in Online Auctions , 2000 .

[24]  R. Rice.  Media Appropriateness Using Social Presence Theory to Compare Traditional and New Organizational Media , 1993 .

[25]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Auctions and Bidding: A Primer , 1989 .

[26]  Abraham Seidmann,et al.  Managing Online Auctions: Current Business and Research Issues , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Quay Snyder,et al.  AT THE HEART OF IT ALL. , 2002 .

[28]  A. Rubin,et al.  Predictors of Internet Use , 2000 .

[29]  Christine Halverson,et al.  Social translucence: designing social infrastructures that make collective activity visible , 2002, CACM.

[30]  Judith S. Donath,et al.  Mediated Faces , 2001, Cognitive Technology.

[31]  Robert B. Wilson.  Chapter 8 Strategic analysis of auctions , 1992 .

[32]  C. W. Smith.  Auctions: The Social Construction of Value , 1989 .

[33]  Paul Resnick,et al.  The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment , 2002 .

[34]  G. Foxall,et al.  Consumer Psychology for Marketing , 1994 .

[35]  R. McAfee,et al.  Auctions and Bidding , 1986 .

[36]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  Online auctions, messaging, communication and social facilitation: a simulation and experimental evidence , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[37]  W. Bearden,et al.  Reference Group Influence on Product and Brand Purchase Decisions , 1982 .

[38]  John A. List,et al.  Preference Learning in Consecutive Experimental Auctions , 2000 .

[39]  Ronald T. Wilcox.  Experts and Amateurs: The Role of Experience in Internet Auctions , 2000 .

[40]  Charles Wankel,et al.  Educating Managers with Tomorrow's Technologies , 2000 .

[41]  M. McLaughlin,et al.  Network and Netplay: virtual groups on the Internet , 1998 .

[42]  DeGross.  Errata Notes: User Heterogeneity and Its Impact on Electronic Auction Market Design: An Empirical Exploration , 2004 .

[43]  James Kliebenstein,et al.  Valuing Food Safety in Experimental Auction Markets , 1995 .

[44]  Lee Sproull,et al.  When the Interface Is a Face , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[45]  U. Dholakia,et al.  Coveted or Overlooked? The Psychology of Bidding for Comparable Listings in Digital Auctions , 2001 .

[46]  Robert Maidment,et al.  Simulation games; design and implementation , 1973 .

[47]  Alok Gupta,et al.  Comparative analysis of multi-item online auctions: evidence from the laboratory , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[48]  Judith S. Donath,et al.  Visual Who: animating the affinities and activities of an electronic community , 1995, MULTIMEDIA '95.

[49]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  The Digitization of Word-of-Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[50]  Gilad Ravid,et al.  Online Simulations in Management Education about Information and its Uses , 2007 .

[51]  L. Friedman.  A Competitive-Bidding Strategy , 1956 .

[52]  Nelson Minar,et al.  Visualizing the crowds at a web site , 1999, CHI EA '99.

[53]  SeidmannAbraham,et al.  Managing Online Auctions , 2003 .

[54]  Patrali Chatterjee,et al.  Commercial Scenarios for the Web: Opportunities and Challenges , 1997, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[55]  U. Dholakia,et al.  Auction or agent (or both)? A study of moderators of the herding bias in digital auctions , 2002 .

[56]  Ravi Bapna,et al.  When snipers become predators: can mechanism design save online auctions? , 2003, CACM.