Evaluation of the effect of speech-rate slowing on speech intelligibility in noise using a simulation of cochlear hearing loss.

The effect of digital processing, which slows the speed of speech (speech-rate) without changing its pitch, has been examined. The processing is intended to make speech communication easier by allowing more time for cognitive processing when the listening situation is difficult, for example, when listening to a foreign language, or when the user has a hearing loss. The speech-rate slowing makes use of a pitch-synchronous partial expansion of the waveform in the time domain. The processing was evaluated using a simulation of hearing loss which has been shown to lead to reduced intelligibility for normally hearing subjects. The simulation included the major consequences of cochlear hearing loss; loudness recruitment, threshold elevation, and reduced frequency selectivity. Two simulations were used: a moderate flat hearing loss with auditory filters broadened by a constant factor of three (B3R2); and the same loss with linear amplification applied prior to the simulation processing (B3R2+). Two expansion rates were used for the speech-rate slowing, 1.25 and 1.50. The intelligibility of sentences in speech-shaped noise was measured. For both simulation conditions, the speech-rate slowing did not give any improvement in intelligibility. Rather, in condition B3R2+ the slowing produced statistically significant deleterious effects on intelligibility. The results suggest that artificial speech-rate slowing will not improve the intelligibility of speech in noise for hearing-impaired people who have the type of cochlear damage simulated in this test.

[1]  B. Moore,et al.  Simulation of the effect of threshold elevation and loudness recruitment combined with reduced frequency selectivity on the intelligibility of speech in noise. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  B C Moore,et al.  Simulation of the effects of loudness recruitment on the intelligibility of speech in noise. , 1995, British journal of audiology.

[3]  T Ifukube,et al.  A portable digital speech-rate converter for hearing impairment. , 1996, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  M. Picheny,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  David Malah,et al.  Time-domain algorithms for harmonic bandwidth reduction and time scaling of speech signals , 1979 .

[6]  L. Braida,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing IV: Further studies of the role of speaking rate. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  B. Moore,et al.  Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in noise , 1993 .

[8]  M. Misaki,et al.  Time-scale modification of speech signals using cross-correlation functions , 1992 .

[9]  N I Durlach,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. III: An attempt to determine the contribution of speaking rate to differences in intelligibility between clear and conversational speech. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[10]  H. Dillon,et al.  The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid , 1986, Ear and hearing.

[11]  Peter W. Lane,et al.  Genstat 5: an Introduction , 1988 .

[12]  B. Moore,et al.  Simulation of the effects of loudness recruitment and threshold elevation on the intelligibility of speech in quiet and in a background of speech. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Jae Lim,et al.  Signal estimation from modified short-time Fourier transform , 1984 .

[14]  R. Plomp,et al.  Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. III. Additional data and final discussion , 1992 .

[15]  N I Durlach,et al.  Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[16]  A. Wilgus,et al.  High quality time-scale modification for speech , 1985, ICASSP '85. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[17]  B C Moore,et al.  Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in the presence of interfering speech. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  A. Macleod,et al.  A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use. , 1990, British journal of audiology.