Social animal models for quantifying plasticity, assortment, and selection on interacting phenotypes

Both assortment and plasticity can facilitate social evolution, as each may generate heritable associations between the phenotypes and fitness of individuals and their social partners. However, it currently remains difficult to empirically disentangle these distinct mechanisms in the wild, particularly for complex and environmentally responsive phenotypes subject to measurement error. To address this challenge, we extend the widely used animal model to facilitate unbiased estimation of plasticity, assortment and selection on social traits, for both phenotypic and quantitative genetic (QG) analysis. Our social animal models (SAMs) estimate key evolutionary parameters for the latent reaction norms underlying repeatable patterns of phenotypic interaction across social environments. As a consequence of this approach, SAMs avoid inferential biases caused by various forms of measurement error in the raw phenotypic associations between social partners. We conducted a simulation study to demonstrate the application of SAMs and investigate their performance for both phenotypic and QG analyses. With sufficient repeated measurements, we found desirably high power, low bias and low uncertainty across model parameters using modest sample and effect sizes, leading to robust predictions of selection and adaptation. Our results suggest that SAMs will readily enhance social evolutionary research on a variety of phenotypes in the wild. We provide detailed coding tutorials and worked examples for implementing SAMs in the Stan statistical programming language.

[1]  A. J. Moore,et al.  A Synthesis of Game Theory and Quantitative Genetic Models of Social Evolution , 2021, bioRxiv.

[2]  Sean M. Ehlman,et al.  Ecology and Evolution of Plasticity , 2021 .

[3]  N. Dingemanse,et al.  Most published selection gradients are underestimated: Why this is and how to fix it , 2021, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  F. Pierre,et al.  Experimental Evidence , 2020, Vision and Perception.

[5]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  Collision between biological process and statistical analysis revealed by mean-centering. , 2020, The Journal of animal ecology.

[6]  J. McNamara,et al.  Game Theory in Biology , 2020 .

[7]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  Regression and Other Stories , 2020 .

[8]  Jonathan Wright,et al.  Pathways to social evolution and their evolutionary feedbacks , 2020, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  Paul L. Hooper,et al.  Paternal provisioning results from ecological change , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  D. Parejo,et al.  Melanism influences the use of social information in a polymorphic owl , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[11]  T. Janicke,et al.  Assortative Mating in Animals and Its Role for Speciation , 2019, The American Naturalist.

[12]  R. Staudte,et al.  Robust analogs to the coefficient of variation , 2019, Journal of applied statistics.

[13]  Nathan P. Lemoine,et al.  Moving beyond noninformative priors: why and how to choose weakly informative priors in Bayesian analyses , 2019, Oikos.

[14]  D. Stuart-Fox,et al.  Meta-analytic evidence that sexual selection improves population fitness , 2019, Nature Communications.

[15]  D. Coltman,et al.  Social effects of territorial neighbours on the timing of spring breeding in North American red squirrels , 2019, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[16]  C. Frère,et al.  Individual Variation in the Social Plasticity of Water Dragons , 2019, The American Naturalist.

[17]  B. Kempenaers,et al.  Scrutinizing assortative mating in birds , 2019, PLoS biology.

[18]  K. Fanson,et al.  Meta-analytic insights into factors influencing the repeatability of hormone levels in agricultural, ecological, and medical fields. , 2019, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[19]  R. Heathcote,et al.  Evolution of non-kin cooperation: social assortment by cooperative phenotype in guppies , 2018, Royal Society Open Science.

[20]  Marcel E Visser,et al.  Phenological mismatch drives selection on elevation, but not on slope, of breeding time plasticity in a wild songbird , 2018, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  L. Simmons,et al.  Sexual selection and its evolutionary consequences in female animals , 2018, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[22]  E. Wȩgrzyn,et al.  Equal division of parental care enhances nestling development in the Blackcap , 2018, PloS one.

[23]  T. Bugnyar,et al.  The EGA+GNM framework: An integrative approach to modelling behavioural syndromes , 2018, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[24]  S. Lea,et al.  The repeatability of cognitive performance: a meta-analysis , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  N. Pilakouta,et al.  Biparental care is more than the sum of its parts: experimental evidence for synergistic effects on offspring fitness , 2018, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Lydia M. Hopper,et al.  Chimpanzees demonstrate individual differences in social information use , 2018, Animal Cognition.

[27]  B. Pujol,et al.  A guide to using a multiple-matrix animal model to disentangle genetic and nongenetic causes of phenotypic variance , 2018, bioRxiv.

[28]  N. Vasiljevic,et al.  Heritable spouse effects increase evolutionary potential of human reproductive timing , 2018, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  A. J. Moore,et al.  Indirect genetic effects in behavioral ecology: does behavior play a special role in evolution? , 2018 .

[30]  Barbara Class,et al.  A statistical methodology for estimating assortative mating for phenotypic traits that are labile or measured with error , 2017 .

[31]  K. Foster,et al.  Assortment and the analysis of natural selection on social traits , 2017, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  Petri T. Niemelä,et al.  Indirect genetic effects: a key component of the genetic architecture of behaviour , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[33]  J. Hadfield,et al.  Interpreting selection when individuals interact , 2017 .

[34]  Jeremy Van Cleve Stags, Hawks, and Doves: Social Evolution Theory and Individual Variation in Cooperation , 2017, bioRxiv.

[35]  Alastair J. Wilson,et al.  Avoiding the misuse of BLUP in behavioural ecology , 2017, Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology.

[36]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Measurement error and the replication crisis , 2017, Science.

[37]  Marcus A. Brubaker,et al.  Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language. , 2017, Journal of statistical software.

[38]  Christian Robert,et al.  Statistical Rethinking , 2017 .

[39]  Christine W. Miller,et al.  Why Sexually Selected Weapons Are Not Ornaments. , 2016, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[40]  D. Heckerman,et al.  Linear mixed model for heritability estimation that explicitly addresses environmental variation , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  General Methods for Evolutionary Quantitative Genetic Inference from Generalized Mixed Models , 2016, Genetics.

[42]  B. Livingstone Social Evolution and Inclusive Fitness Theory: An Introduction , 2016 .

[43]  Richard McElreath,et al.  Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan , 2015 .

[44]  A. Culina,et al.  Trading up: the fitness consequences of divorce in monogamous birds , 2015, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[45]  N. Dingemanse,et al.  The biology hidden inside residual within‐individual phenotypic variation , 2015, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[46]  G. Leckie,et al.  Multilevel modeling analysis of dyadic network data with an application to Ye'kwana food sharing. , 2015, American journal of physical anthropology.

[47]  A. Gardner,et al.  Major evolutionary transitions in individuality , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Alexander E. G. Lee,et al.  Phenotypic assortment in wild primate networks: implications for the dissemination of information , 2015, Royal Society Open Science.

[49]  D. Farine,et al.  Selection for territory acquisition is modulated by social network structure in a wild songbird , 2015, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[50]  Niels J Dingemanse,et al.  Interacting personalities: behavioural ecology meets quantitative genetics. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[51]  A. J. Moore,et al.  Quantitative genetic versions of Hamilton's rule with empirical applications , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  Dany Garant,et al.  The effects of others’ genes: maternal and other indirect genetic effects , 2014 .

[53]  Franz J Weissing,et al.  Consistent individual differences in human social learning strategies , 2014, Nature Communications.

[54]  J. Stinchcombe,et al.  ESTIMATING UNCERTAINTY IN MULTIVARIATE RESPONSES TO SELECTION , 2014, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[55]  N. Dingemanse,et al.  Characterizing behavioural ‘characters’: an evolutionary framework , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[56]  Samuel L. Díaz-Muñoz,et al.  Cooperating to compete: altruism, sexual selection and causes of male reproductive cooperation , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[57]  R. Johnstone,et al.  Animal signals , 2013, Current Biology.

[58]  M. Morrissey,et al.  UNIFICATION OF REGRESSION‐BASED METHODS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF NATURAL SELECTION , 2013, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[59]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Assortative Mating in Animals , 2013, The American Naturalist.

[60]  J. Brommer On between-individual and residual (co)variances in the study of animal personality: are you willing to take the “individual gambit”? , 2013, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[61]  P. Bijma The quantitative genetics of indirect genetic effects: a selective review of modelling issues , 2013, Heredity.

[62]  Jeremy Van Cleve,et al.  Pathways to social evolution: reciprocity, relatedness, and synergy , 2012, bioRxiv.

[63]  L. Kruuk,et al.  THE PREDICTION OF ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION: EMPIRICAL APPLICATION OF THE SECONDARY THEOREM OF SELECTION AND COMPARISON TO THE BREEDER’S EQUATION , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[64]  D. Westneat EVOLUTION IN RESPONSE TO SOCIAL SELECTION: THE IMPORTANCE OF INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF TRAITS ON FITNESS , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[65]  H. Klug,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIAL INTERACTIONS CHANGES PREDICTIONS ABOUT INTERACTING PHENOTYPES , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[66]  P. Bijma A General Definition of the Heritable Variation That Determines the Potential of a Population to Respond to Selection , 2011, Genetics.

[67]  R. E. Butterfield,et al.  PHENOTYPIC ASSORTMENT MEDIATES THE EFFECT OF SOCIAL SELECTION IN A WILD BEETLE POPULATION , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[68]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural equation models and the quantification of behavior , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[69]  D. Queller,et al.  Expanded social fitness and Hamilton's rule for kin, kith, and kind , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[70]  Andrew F. G. Bourke,et al.  Principles of Social Evolution , 2011 .

[71]  D. Roff,et al.  Applying a quantitative genetics framework to behavioural syndrome research , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[72]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  Repeatability for Gaussian and non‐Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists , 2010, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[73]  L. Kruuk,et al.  The danger of applying the breeder's equation in observational studies of natural populations , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[74]  A. J. Moore,et al.  INTERACTING PHENOTYPES AND THE EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS. III. SOCIAL EVOLUTION , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[75]  M. Wade,et al.  Group selection and social evolution in domesticated animals , 2010, Evolutionary applications.

[76]  C. Steglich,et al.  8. Dynamic Networks and Behavior: Separating Selection from Influence , 2010 .

[77]  H. Rundle,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR THE EVOLUTION OF INDIRECT GENETIC EFFECTS: CHANGES IN THE INTERACTION EFFECT COEFFICIENT, PSI (Ψ), DUE TO SEXUAL SELECTION , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[78]  Jarrod D. Hadfield,et al.  MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models , 2010 .

[79]  Denis Réale,et al.  Behavioural reaction norms: animal personality meets individual plasticity. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[80]  Jarrod D. Hadfield,et al.  The Misuse of BLUP in Ecology and Evolution , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[81]  E. Brodie,et al.  How to Measure Indirect Genetic Effects: The Congruence of Trait-Based and Variance-Partitioning Approaches , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[82]  Kate L. Laskowski,et al.  The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[83]  Martijn van de Pol,et al.  A simple method for distinguishing within- versus between-subject effects using mixed models , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[84]  Franz J. Weissing,et al.  Evolutionary emergence of responsive and unresponsive personalities , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[85]  M. Wade,et al.  The joint effects of kin, multilevel selection and indirect genetic effects on response to genetic selection , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[86]  H. Kokko,et al.  Mortality and other determinants of bird divorce rate , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[87]  Madeleine Beekman,et al.  Ancestral Monogamy Shows Kin Selection Is Key to the Evolution of Eusociality , 2008, Science.

[88]  L. Kruuk,et al.  How to separate genetic and environmental causes of similarity between relatives , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[89]  Steven A. Frank,et al.  All of life is social , 2007, Current Biology.

[90]  D. Nussey,et al.  The evolutionary ecology of individual phenotypic plasticity in wild populations , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[91]  H. Kokko,et al.  Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[92]  A. J. Moore,et al.  Interacting Phenotypes and the Evolutionary Process. II. Selection Resulting from Social Interactions , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[93]  S. Siller Foundations of Social Evolution , 1999, Heredity.

[94]  B. Kempenaers,et al.  Extra-pair paternity in birds: explaining variation between species and populations. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[95]  A. J. Moore,et al.  INTERACTING PHENOTYPES AND THE EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS: I. DIRECT AND INDIRECT GENETIC EFFECTS OF SOCIAL INTERACTIONS , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[96]  G. W. Rowe,et al.  Game Theory in Biology , 1997 .

[97]  A. E. Weis,et al.  MEASURING SELECTION ON REACTION NORMS: AN EXPLORATION OF THE EUROSTA‐SOLIDAGO SYSTEM , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[98]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[99]  R. Lande QUANTITATIVE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIVARIATE EVOLUTION, APPLIED TO BRAIN:BODY SIZE ALLOMETRY , 1979, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[100]  G. Price,et al.  Extension of covariance selection mathematics , 1972, Annals of human genetics.

[101]  P. Young,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[102]  A. Robertson A mathematical model of the culling process in dairy cattle , 1966 .

[103]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[104]  S. R. Searle,et al.  PHENOTYPIC, GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CORRELATIONS , 1961 .

[105]  Philipp Sprau,et al.  An Approach to Distinguish between Plasticity and Non-random Distributions of Behavioral Types Along Urban Gradients in a Wild Passerine Bird , 2017, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[106]  D. Rubenstein,et al.  Comparative Social Evolution , 2017 .

[107]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[108]  N. Dingemanse,et al.  Quantifying individual variation in behaviour: mixed-effect modelling approaches. , 2013, The Journal of animal ecology.

[109]  B. Potts,et al.  Genetic control of interactions among individuals: contrasting outcomes of indirect genetic effects arising from neighbour disease infection and competition in a forest tree. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[110]  P. Gabriel,et al.  Behavioural Syndromes, Partner Compatibility and Reproductive Performance in Steller’s Jays , 2012 .

[111]  S. E. Koski,et al.  How to Measure Animal Personality and Why Does It Matter? Integrating the Psychological and Biological Approaches to Animal Personality , 2011 .

[112]  Erik Postma,et al.  An ecologist's guide to the animal model. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[113]  J. S. Martin Estimating Nonlinear Selection on Behavioral Reaction Norms , 2022 .