Rate-dependence of 'wet' biological adhesives and the function of the pad secretion in insects.

Many insects use soft adhesive footpads for climbing. The surface contact of these organs is mediated by small volumes of a liquid secretion, which forms thin films in the contact zone. Here, we investigate the role of viscous dissipation by this secretion and the 'bulk' pad cuticle by quantifying the rate-dependence of the adhesive force of individual pads. Adhesion increased with retraction speed, but this effect was independent of the amount of pad secretion present in the contact zone, suggesting that the secretion's viscosity did not play a significant role. Instead, the rate-dependence can be explained by relating the strain energy release rate to the speed of crack propagation, using an established empirical power law. The 'wet' pads' behaviour was akin to that of 'dry' elastomers, with an equilibrium energy release rate close to that of dry van-der-Waals contacts. We suggest that the secretion mainly serves as a 'release layer', minimising viscous dissipation and thereby reducing the time- and 'loading-history'-dependence of the adhesive pads. In contrast to many commercial adhesives which derive much of their strength from viscous dissipation, we show that the major modulator of adhesive strength in 'wet' biological adhesive pads is friction, exhibiting a much larger effect than retraction speed. A comparison between 'wet' and 'dry' biological adhesives, using both results from this study and the literature, revealed a striking lack of differences in attachment performance under varying experimental conditions. Together, these results suggest that 'wet' and 'dry' biological adhesives may be more similar than previously thought.

[1]  Wolfgang G. Knauss,et al.  Crack Propagation in a Linearly Viscoelastic Strip , 1971 .

[2]  Matt Wilkinson,et al.  Dynamic friction in natural and synthetic gecko setal arrays , 2013 .

[3]  J. A. Greenwood,et al.  The mechanics of adhesion of viscoelastic solids , 1981 .

[4]  David Labonte,et al.  Functionally Different Pads on the Same Foot Allow Control of Attachment: Stick Insects Have Load-Sensitive “Heel” Pads for Friction and Shear-Sensitive “Toe” Pads for Adhesion , 2013, PloS one.

[5]  Aaron Parness,et al.  Rate-dependent frictional adhesion in natural and synthetic gecko setae , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[6]  M. Cutkosky,et al.  Frictional adhesion: a new angle on gecko attachment , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[7]  C. Clemente,et al.  Evidence for self-cleaning in fluid-based smooth and hairy adhesive systems of insects , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[8]  K. Shull,et al.  JKR Studies of Acrylic Elastomer Adhesion to Glassy Polymer Substrates , 1996 .

[9]  B. Francis,et al.  Apparatus-specific analysis of fluid adhesion measurements , 2001 .

[10]  R. Maboudian,et al.  Adhesion Characteristics of PDMS Surfaces During Repeated Pull‐Off Force Measurements , 2010 .

[11]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  The design of the fly adhesive pad: distal tenent setae are adapted to the delivery of an adhesive secretion , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  L. Roth,et al.  Tarsal structure and climbing ability of cockroaches , 1952 .

[13]  Bettina Prüm,et al.  Impact of chemical manipulation of tarsal liquids on attachment in the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. , 2010, Journal of insect physiology.

[14]  Janek von Byern,et al.  Biological Adhesive Systems , 2010 .

[15]  B. Persson,et al.  Crack propagation in viscoelastic solids. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  W. Barnes,et al.  Sticking like sticky tape: tree frogs use friction forces to enhance attachment on overhanging surfaces , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[17]  K. A. Grosch,et al.  The relation between the friction and visco-elastic properties of rubber , 1963, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[18]  R. Full,et al.  Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair , 2000, Nature.

[19]  K. Kendall The adhesion and surface energy of elastic solids , 1971 .

[20]  J. Israelachvili,et al.  Adhesion and Friction of Polymer Surfaces: The Effect of Chain Ends , 2005 .

[21]  S. Gorb,et al.  Comparative study of the fluid viscosity in tarsal hairy attachment systems of flies and beetles , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[22]  Jan-Henning Dirks,et al.  Insect tricks: two-phasic foot pad secretion prevents slipping , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[23]  R. Full,et al.  Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  D. Maugis,et al.  Tackiness of Elastomers , 1981 .

[25]  S. Gorb,et al.  Temporary stay at various environmental humidities affects attachment ability of Colorado potato beetles Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) , 2010 .

[26]  T. Eisner,et al.  Defense by foot adhesion in a beetle (Hemisphaerota cyanea). , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Plant surfaces with cuticular folds and their replicas: influence of microstructuring and surface chemistry on the attachment of a leaf beetle. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[28]  R. Full,et al.  An Integrative Study of Insect Adhesion: Mechanics and Wet Adhesion of Pretarsal Pads in Ants1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[29]  Helmut Schmitz,et al.  Water as a major modulator of the mechanical properties of insect cuticle. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[30]  W. Sawyer,et al.  Adhesion: role of bulk viscoelasticity and surface roughness , 2013, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[31]  J. D. Gillett,et al.  The Climbing Organ of an Insect, Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera; Reduviidae) , 1932 .

[32]  Hisae Yoshizawa,et al.  Fundamental mechanisms of interfacial friction. 1. Relation between adhesion and friction , 1993 .

[33]  Ryohei Yamaoka,et al.  Chemical Composition of Footprints and Cuticula Lipids of Three Species of Lady Beetles. , 1996 .

[34]  Alyssa Y Stark,et al.  Surface wettability plays a significant role in gecko adhesion underwater , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  B. Newby,et al.  Macroscopic Evidence of the Effect of Interfacial Slippage on Adhesion , 1995, Science.

[36]  Robert M. McMeeking,et al.  Detachment of compliant films adhered to stiff substrates via van der Waals interactions: role of frictional sliding during peeling , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[37]  B. Newby,et al.  Friction in adhesion , 1998 .

[38]  S. Gorb,et al.  Extensive collection of femtolitre pad secretion droplets in the beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata allows nanolitre microrheology , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[39]  Mao-Jiun J. Wang,et al.  Image thresholding by minimizing the measures of fuzzines , 1995, Pattern Recognit..

[40]  Walter Federle,et al.  Biomechanics of smooth adhesive pads in insects: influence of tarsal secretion on attachment performance , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[41]  S. Emerson,et al.  Toe pad morphology and mechanisms of sticking in frogs , 1980 .

[42]  M. Chaudhury,et al.  Interfacial Rate Processes in Adhesion and Friction , 2000 .

[43]  A. Gent,et al.  Effect of Wetting Liquids on the Strength of Adhesion of Viscoelastic Material , 1972 .

[44]  K. Peschke,et al.  Congruence of epicuticular hydrocarbons and tarsal secretions as a principle in beetles , 2011, Chemoecology.

[45]  B. Persson,et al.  On the origin of why static or breakloose friction is larger than kinetic friction, and how to reduce it: the role of aging, elasticity and sequential interfacial slip , 2012, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[46]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Chemical composition of the attachment pad secretion of the locust Locusta migratoria. , 2002, Insect biochemistry and molecular biology.

[47]  L. Léger,et al.  Effect of surface elasticity on the rheology of nanometric liquids. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[48]  K. Peschke,et al.  Comparison of tarsal and cuticular chemistry in the leaf beetle Gastrophysa viridula (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and an evaluation of solid-phase microextraction and solvent extraction techniques , 2009, Chemoecology.

[49]  Jan-Henning Dirks,et al.  Arachnids Secrete a Fluid over Their Adhesive Pads , 2011, PloS one.

[50]  Walter Federle,et al.  Comparison of smooth and hairy attachment pads in insects: friction, adhesion and mechanisms for direction-dependence , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[51]  O. Betz,et al.  Analysis of chemical profiles of insect adhesion secretions by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. , 2015, Analytica chimica acta.

[52]  W. Federle,et al.  Fluid-based adhesion in insects – principles and challenges , 2011 .

[53]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[54]  Jim Hardie,et al.  THE ORGANS OF ADHESION IN THE APHID MEGOURA VICIAE , 1988 .

[55]  S. Gorb,et al.  Hexagonal Surface Micropattern for Dry and Wet Friction , 2009 .

[56]  E. Charlaix,et al.  Hydrodynamic interactions for the measurement of thin film elastic properties , 2011, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[57]  K. Shull,et al.  Effects of Substrate Modification on the Interfacial Adhesion of Acrylic Elastomers , 1998 .

[58]  A. Jagota,et al.  Crack blunting and the strength of soft elastic solids , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[59]  S. Gorb,et al.  Ultrastructural architecture and mechanical properties of attachment pads in Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera Tettigoniidae) , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[60]  M. Sitti,et al.  Effect of retraction speed on adhesion of elastomer fibrillar structures , 2012 .

[61]  Marion D. Kendall,et al.  The Anatomy of the Tarsi of Schistocerca gregaria Forskål , 2004, Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie.

[62]  K. Shull Contact mechanics and the adhesion of soft solids , 2002 .

[63]  K. Shull,et al.  Effects of methylation and neutralization of carboxylated poly(n-butyl acrylate) on the interfacial and bulk contributions to adhesion , 1998 .

[64]  Graeme D. Ruxton,et al.  Adhesion and allometry from metamorphosis to maturation in hylid tree frogs: a sticky problem , 2006 .

[65]  Matt Wilkinson,et al.  Effects of humidity on the mechanical properties of gecko setae. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[66]  J. Dirks Physical principles of fluid-mediated insect attachment - Shouldn’t insects slip? , 2014, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.

[67]  Peter H. Niewiarowski,et al.  Sticky Gecko Feet: The Role of Temperature and Humidity , 2008, PloS one.

[68]  Hamed Lakrout,et al.  Micromechanics of flat‐probe adhesion tests of soft viscoelastic polymer films , 2000 .

[69]  W. Barnes,et al.  Adhesion and Detachment of the Toe Pads of Tree Frogs , 1991 .

[70]  C. Billot,et al.  Isolation of Microsatellite Markers in the Calliptamus Genus (Orthoptera, Acrididae) , 2010, Journal of insect science.

[71]  W. Baumgartner,et al.  Determination of the Young's modulus of the epicuticle of the smooth adhesive organs of Carausius morosus using tensile testing , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[72]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Meniscus and viscous forces during separation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces with liquid-mediated contacts , 2008 .

[73]  Alyssa Y. Stark,et al.  Direct evidence of phospholipids in gecko footprints and spatula–substrate contact interface detected using surface-sensitive spectroscopy , 2012, Journal of the Royal Society Interface.

[74]  K. Kendall,et al.  Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[75]  A. Crosby,et al.  Adhesive failure analysis of pressure-sensitive adhesives , 1999 .

[76]  David Labonte,et al.  Scaling and biomechanics of surface attachment in climbing animals , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[77]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Effects of surface topography and chemistry of Rumex obtusifolius leaves on the attachment of the beetle Gastrophysa viridula , 2009 .

[78]  Oliver Betz,et al.  Structure of the tarsi in some stenus species (coleoptera, staphylinidae): External morphology, ultrastructure, and tarsal secretion , 2003, Journal of morphology.

[79]  Nigel E. Stork,et al.  A scanning electron microscope study of tarsal adhesive setae in the Coleoptera , 1980 .

[80]  Thomas Endlein,et al.  Self-cleaning in tree frog toe pads; a mechanism for recovering from contamination without the need for grooming , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[81]  D. Maugis,et al.  Fracture mechanics and the adherence of viscoelastic bodies , 1978 .

[82]  Peter H. Niewiarowski,et al.  The effect of surface water and wetting on gecko adhesion , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[83]  A. Crosby,et al.  Axisymmetric adhesion tests of soft materials , 1998 .

[84]  Nigel E. Stork,et al.  The adherence of beetle tarsal setae to glass , 1983 .

[85]  W. Federle,et al.  Mechanisms of fluid production in smooth adhesive pads of insects , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[86]  L. White,et al.  Contact elasticity in the presence of capillary condensation , 1990 .

[87]  A. F. G. Dixon,et al.  The Mechanism by Which Aphids Adhere to Smooth Surfaces , 1990 .

[88]  G. Walker,et al.  The adhesive organ of the blowfly, Calliphora vomitoria: a functional approach (Diptera: Calliphoridae) , 1985 .

[89]  Werner Baumgartner,et al.  Micromechanics of smooth adhesive organs in stick insects: pads are mechanically anisotropic and softer towards the adhesive surface , 2008, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[90]  A. Gent Adhesion and Strength of Viscoelastic Solids. Is There a Relationship between Adhesion and Bulk Properties , 1996 .

[91]  J. Israelachvili,et al.  Tribology of Shearing Polymer Surfaces. 1. Mica Sliding on Polymer (PnBMA) , 1999 .

[92]  Matt Wilkinson,et al.  Frictional and elastic energy in gecko adhesive detachment , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[93]  A. Crosby,et al.  Deformation and Failure Modes of Adhesively Bonded Elastic Layers , 2000 .

[94]  S. Gorb,et al.  Subdigital setae of chameleon feet: Friction-enhancing microstructures for a wide range of substrate roughness , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[95]  Ralph Spolenak,et al.  Evidence for capillarity contributions to gecko adhesion from single spatula nanomechanical measurements. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[96]  J. Hooker,et al.  Bulk and Interfacial Contributions to the Debonding Mechanisms of Soft Adhesives: Extension to Large Strains , 2001 .

[97]  Costantino Creton,et al.  Pressure-Sensitive Adhesives: An Introductory Course , 2003 .

[98]  V. Ernst,et al.  The digital pads of the tree frog, Hyla cinerea. II. The mucous glands. , 1973, Tissue & cell.

[99]  Werner Baumgartner,et al.  Biomechanics of ant adhesive pads: frictional forces are rate- and temperature-dependent , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[100]  Matthias Scherge,et al.  Structural Design and Biomechanics of Friction-Based Releasable Attachment Devices in Insects1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[101]  David M. Green,et al.  Adhesion and the Toe-pads of Treefrogs , 1981 .

[102]  A. van Casteren,et al.  Foot Morphology and Substrate Adhesion in the Madagascan Hissing Cockroach, Gromphadorhina portentosa , 2010, Journal of insect science.

[103]  W. Barnes Functional Morphology and Design Constraints of Smooth Adhesive Pads , 2007 .

[104]  W. Barnes,et al.  Wet but not slippery: boundary friction in tree frog adhesive toe pads , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[105]  Jonas O. Wolff,et al.  The influence of humidity on the attachment ability of the spider Philodromus dispar (Araneae, Philodromidae) , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[106]  John A Rogers,et al.  Competing fracture in kinetically controlled transfer printing. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[107]  Matt Wilkinson,et al.  Changes in materials properties explain the effects of humidity on gecko adhesion , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[108]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Elastic modulus of tree frog adhesive toe pads , 2011, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[109]  K. Autumn,et al.  Evidence for self-cleaning in gecko setae. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[110]  Walter Federle,et al.  Why are so many adhesive pads hairy? , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[111]  J. Vincent,et al.  Design and mechanical properties of insect cuticle. , 2004, Arthropod structure & development.