Touching the Grass: Science, Uncertainty and Everyday Life from Chernobyl to Fukushima

The Fukushima nuclear disaster of March 2011 raises profound questions, not only about the use of nuclear energy, but also about the way in which scientific knowledge is constructed and communicated. This article focuses particularly on the divergent ways in which the notion of ‘uncertainty’ is understood by scientists and scientific bodies engaged in studying the effects of the Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters, and by the residents who are the main victims of these disasters. I argue that the approach to uncertainty and risk assessment developed by bodies like UNSCEAR and the Chernobyl Forum has been applied in Fukushima in ways that have widened the gap in understanding between academic scientists and local residents, but I also point to experiments in citizen science that have potential to help bridge this gap.

[1]  M. Quastel,et al.  Incidence of childhood disease in Belarus associated with the Chernobyl accident. , 1997, Environmental health perspectives.

[2]  O. Kuchinskaya "We Will Die and Become Science": The Production of Invisibility and Public Knowledge about Chernobyl Radiation Effects in Belarus , 2007 .

[3]  Naoki Matsuda,et al.  Assessment of Internal Exposure Doses in Fukushima by a Whole Body Counter Within One Month after the Nuclear Power Plant Accident , 2013, Radiation research.

[4]  Akifumi Fukumura,et al.  NIRS external dose estimation system for Fukushima residents after the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP accident , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[5]  S. Akiba Epidemiological studies of Fukushima residents exposed to ionising radiation from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant prefecture—a preliminary review of current plans , 2012, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[6]  G. Brumfiel,et al.  Japan's nuclear crisis: Fukushima's legacy of fear , 2012, Nature.

[7]  A. V. Nesterenko,et al.  Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment. , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[8]  J. Kaprio,et al.  Personality traits and cancer risk and survival based on Finnish and Swedish registry data. , 2010, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  Jacques Ferlay,et al.  Estimates of the cancer burden in Europe from radioactive fallout from the Chernobyl accident , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[10]  H. Synal,et al.  Plutonium release from Fukushima Daiichi fosters the need for more detailed investigations , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Reiko Hasegawa,et al.  Disaster Evacuation from Japan's 2011 Tsunami Disaster and the Fukushima Nuclear Accident , 2013 .

[12]  Malcolm Crick,et al.  United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) activities and issues , 2011 .

[13]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science , 1992 .

[14]  R. Wakeford And now, Fukushima , 2011, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[15]  B. Wynne Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. , 1992 .

[16]  Elena Bakhanova,et al.  Environmental Health Perspectives Environmental Health Perspectives Radiation and the Risk of Chronic Lymphocytic and Other Leukemias among Chornobyl Cleanup Workers Ehp Radiation and the Risk of Chronic Lymphocytic and Other Leukemias among Chornobyl Cleanup Workers , 2022 .

[17]  M. Korstanje The Risk Society: Towards a new modernity , 2009 .

[18]  R. Doll,et al.  Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  G. Lazjuk,et al.  Changes in registered congenital anomalies in the republic of belarus after the chernobyl accident , 1997, Stem cells.

[20]  C. Baldick,et al.  THE OXFORD DICTIONARY OF LITERARY TERMS , 2008 .

[21]  S. Fukushima,et al.  Urinary bladder carcinogenesis induced by chronic exposure to persistent low-dose ionizing radiation after Chernobyl accident. , 2009, Carcinogenesis.

[22]  W. Boyd,et al.  Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity@@@Risk and Rationality: Philosophical; Foundations for Populist Reforms , 1993 .

[23]  Seiji 誠司 Yasumura 安村,et al.  Study Protocol for the Fukushima Health Management Survey , 2012, Journal of epidemiology.

[24]  Olga Kuchinskaya,et al.  Twice invisible: Formal representations of radiation danger , 2013 .

[25]  Morris F. Low,et al.  Science, technology and society in postwar Japan , 1992, Medical History.

[26]  P DESAIVE,et al.  [Thyroid cancer]. , 1951, Revue medicale de Liege.

[27]  M. Balonov On protecting the inexperienced reader from Chernobyl myths. , 2012, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[28]  A. Møller,et al.  Perspectives on Chernobyl and Fukushima Health Effects: What Can Be Learned From Eastern European Research? , 2013 .

[29]  A. V. Nesterenko,et al.  Chapter III. Consequences of the Chernobyl Catastrophe for the Environment , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Sergei V Jargin,et al.  Overestimation of Chernobyl consequences: poorly substantiated information published , 2010, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[31]  A. V. Nesterenko,et al.  Reply to letter by Jargin on “overestimation of Chernobyl consequences: poorly substantiated information published” , 2010 .

[32]  Sharon Dunwoody,et al.  Communicating uncertainty: media coverage of new and controversial science. , 1999 .

[33]  S. Fukushima,et al.  Specific p53 gene mutations in urinary bladder epithelium after the Chernobyl accident. , 1999, Cancer research.

[34]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Misunderstanding science?: Misunderstood misunderstandings: social identities and public uptake of science , 1996 .

[35]  J. Langdon-Davies Science and Everyday Life , 1940, Nature.

[36]  I. Emerit,et al.  Lessons learned from the study of immigrants to Israel from areas of Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine contaminated by the Chernobyl accident. , 1997, Environmental health perspectives.

[37]  J. Lochard Chapter 17 - Stakeholder Engagement in Regaining Decent Living Conditions after Chernobyl∗ , 2013 .

[38]  R. D. Tripathi,et al.  Environmental bioremediation technologies , 2007 .

[39]  Gayle Greene Science with a Skew: The Nuclear Power Industry after Chernobyl and Fukushima , 2011 .

[40]  Adam Broinowski Fukushima: Life and the Transnationality of RadioactiveContamination 生命と国境を越える放射能汚染 , 2013 .

[41]  Norimatsu Satoko,et al.  The Truth About Nuclear Power: Japanese Nuclear Engineer Calls for Abolition 核の真実−−日本の核技術者、廃絶を訴える • Japanese text available , 2011 .

[42]  S. Yamashita,et al.  Risk of thyroid cancer after the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident. , 2013, Respiratory investigation.