Incentives and barriers for participation in community-based environmental monitoring and information systems: A critical analysis and integration of the literature

Abstract The reliance of environmental management on comprehensive, high quality, timely and (ideally) affordable data and information has given rise to the need for ‘shared environmental information systems’ (SEIS). Community-based monitoring and information systems or ‘citizen observatories’ are a form of SEIS whereby citizens are involved in new roles such as data collection for environmental monitoring, data and knowledge sharing for joint decision- making, and cooperative planning. Despite the technological advances and the notional potential, many efforts to implement community-based monitoring systems (CBM) are facing difficulties with engaging the core stakeholder. The success of CBMs relies on the active participation and commitment of all involved stakeholders: citizen, decision and policy makers, and (private) data aggregators and scientists. This requires in-depth understanding of their motivations, incentives and barriers for participating. This paper draws on the Theory of Planned Behaviour as an organising theoretical framework and reviews the (dispersed) empirical insights from the literature in order to generate an integrated overview of the incentives and barriers of the aforementioned stakeholders to participate in CBMs. The insights from the literature allow us to take stock of the state of research into motivations for CBM participation, to identify complementary and conflicting incentives for the respective actors, and to indicate gaps to be addressed in future research.

[1]  Billy Haworth,et al.  Emergency management perspectives on volunteered geographic information: Opportunities, challenges and change , 2016, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[2]  G. Whitelaw,et al.  Establishing the Canadian Community Monitoring Network , 2003, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[3]  U. Wehn,et al.  Knowledge transfer dynamics and innovation: Behaviour, interactions and aggregated outcomes , 2016 .

[4]  F. Aggestam,et al.  Setting the stage for a Shared Environmental Information System , 2019, Environmental Science & Policy.

[5]  Jiří Hřebíček,et al.  Current Trends in eEnvironment and its Role in eDemocracy , 2008 .

[6]  Margret C. Domroese,et al.  Why watch bees? Motivations of citizen science volunteers in the Great Pollinator Project , 2017 .

[7]  Antony Stephen Reid Manstead,et al.  The role of moral norm in the attitude-behavior relationship , 2000 .

[8]  C. Findlay,et al.  The Rauischholzhausen Agenda for Road Ecology , 2007 .

[9]  Mike Sharples,et al.  Profiles of engagement in online communities of citizen science participation , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  David P. Anderson,et al.  Scientists@Home: What Drives the Quantity and Quality of Online Citizen Science Participation? , 2014, PloS one.

[11]  Krithi K. Karanth,et al.  Network environmentalism: Citizen scientists as agents for environmental advocacy , 2014 .

[12]  Delphine Reinhardt,et al.  Survey-based exploration of attitudes to participatory sensing tasks in location-based gaming communities , 2016, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[13]  W. Ganzevoort,et al.  Sharing biodiversity data: citizen scientists’ concerns and motivations , 2017, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[14]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Prediction of goal directed behaviour: Attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioural control , 1986 .

[15]  Jamie Woodcock,et al.  Doing Good Online: The Changing Relationships Between Motivations, Activity, and Retention Among Online Volunteers , 2018, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly.

[16]  Chris J. Johnson,et al.  Confronting barriers and recognizing opportunities: Developing effective community-based environmental monitoring programs to meet the needs of Aboriginal communities , 2017 .

[17]  Derek L. Hansen,et al.  Motivations Affecting Initial and Long-Term Participation in Citizen Science Projects in Three Countries , 2014 .

[18]  Steffen Fritz,et al.  Citizen science and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals , 2019, Nature Sustainability.

[19]  Christopher Kullenberg,et al.  What Is Citizen Science? – A Scientometric Meta-Analysis , 2016, PloS one.

[20]  Uta Wehn,et al.  Participation in flood risk management and the potential of citizen observatories: A governance analysis , 2015 .

[21]  B. Rodríguez-Labajos,et al.  Understanding the relationship between volunteers’ motivations and learning outcomes of Citizen Science in rice ecosystems in the Northern Philippines , 2018, Paddy and Water Environment.

[22]  Marco Palma,et al.  Stirring the strategic direction of scuba diving marine Citizen Science: A survey of active and potential participants , 2018, PloS one.

[23]  Thomas Pick From Århus to Inspire: Putting Environmental Information on the Map , 2007, EnviroInfo.

[24]  E. Harvey,et al.  Can citizen science work? Perceptions of the role and utility of citizen science in a marine policy and management context , 2016 .

[25]  Mohammad Gharesifard,et al.  What Drives Citizens to Engage in ICT-Enabled Citizen Science?: Case Study of Online Amateur Weather Networks , 2017 .

[26]  Alan Grainger,et al.  Citizen Observatories and the New Earth Observation Science , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[27]  Les G. Underhill,et al.  Understanding the Motivations and Satisfactions of Volunteers to Improve the Effectiveness of Citizen Science Programs , 2015 .

[28]  C. Conrad,et al.  Community-Based Monitoring Frameworks: Increasing the Effectiveness of Environmental Stewardship , 2008, Environmental management.

[29]  Evidence-based conservation and evidence-informed policy: a response to Adams & Sandbrook , 2013, Oryx.

[30]  Mary Anne Kennan,et al.  Data sharing for the advancement of science: Overcoming barriers for citizen scientists , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[31]  S. Winter,et al.  Harnessing Technology and Citizen Science to Support Neighborhoods that Promote Active Living in Mexico , 2016, Journal of Urban Health.

[32]  M. Conner,et al.  Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further Research , 1998 .

[33]  Wendy Wood,et al.  Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. , 1998 .

[34]  W. Ganzevoort,et al.  Implementing participatory monitoring in river management: The role of stakeholders' perspectives and incentives. , 2017, Journal of environmental management.

[35]  Wei Liu,et al.  Integrated Participatory and Collaborative Risk Mapping for Enhancing Disaster Resilience , 2018, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[36]  Christian Hergarten,et al.  Citizen science in hydrology and water resources: opportunities for knowledge generation, ecosystem service management, and sustainable development , 2014, Front. Earth Sci..

[37]  N. Longnecker,et al.  Benefits and challenges of incorporating citizen science into university education , 2017, PloS one.

[38]  U. Wehn,et al.  Stakeholder engagement in water governance as social learning: lessons from practice , 2018, OECD Principles on Water Governance.

[39]  Ailene K. Ettinger,et al.  The science of citizen science: Exploring barriers to use as a primary research tool , 2017 .

[40]  U. Wehn,et al.  The social innovation potential of ICT-enabled citizen observatories to increase eParticipation in local flood risk management , 2015 .

[41]  V. Reyes‐García,et al.  What's in a name? Unpacking “participatory” environmental monitoring , 2018 .

[42]  Mark S. Johnson,et al.  Citizen science for water quality monitoring: Data implications of citizen perspectives. , 2017, Journal of environmental management.

[43]  Abby Kinchy Citizen Science and Democracy: Participatory Water Monitoring in the Marcellus Shale Fracking Boom , 2017 .

[44]  R. Bonney,et al.  Citizen Science as a Tool for Conservation in Residential Ecosystems , 2007 .

[45]  Thomas Llewelyn Webb,et al.  What Factors Predict Scientists' Intentions to Participate in Public Engagement of Science Activities? , 2007 .

[46]  G. Everett,et al.  Initiating and continuing participation in citizen science for natural history , 2016, BMC Ecology.

[47]  E. Bruce,et al.  Assessing the application and value of participatory mapping for community bushfire preparation , 2016 .

[48]  S. West,et al.  Recruiting and Retaining Participants in Citizen Science: What Can Be Learned from the Volunteering Literature? , 2016 .

[49]  Piran C. L. White,et al.  Motivations and barriers in relation to community participation in biodiversity recording , 2012 .

[50]  Chris Sandbrook,et al.  Conservation, evidence and policy , 2013, Oryx.

[51]  L. Christidis,et al.  Understanding drivers, barriers and information sources for public participation in marine citizen science , 2016 .

[52]  D. Bardsley,et al.  Monitoring to Learn, Learning to Monitor: A Critical Analysis of Opportunities for Indigenous Community‐Based Monitoring of Environmental Change in Australian Rangelands , 2016 .

[53]  I. Ajzen Residual Effects of Past on Later Behavior: Habituation and Reasoned Action Perspectives , 2002 .

[54]  B. Bastian,et al.  Solidarity with Animals: Assessing a Relevant Dimension of Social Identification with Animals , 2017, PloS one.

[55]  Andrew May,et al.  The motivations, enablers and barriers for voluntary participation in an online crowdsourcing platform , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[56]  Janice Ansine,et al.  Ten principles of citizen science , 2018 .

[57]  R. Lilieholm,et al.  The Maine Vernal Pool Mapping and Assessment Program: Engaging Municipal Officials and Private Landowners in Community-Based Citizen Science , 2013, Environmental Management.

[58]  Candie C. Wilderman,et al.  Public Participation in Scientific Research: a Framework for Deliberate Design , 2012 .

[59]  U. Wehn,et al.  Data-sharing bottlenecks in transboundary integrated water resources management: a case study of the Mekong River Commission’s procedures for data sharing in the Thai context , 2014 .

[60]  Robert L. Ryan,et al.  Predicting Volunteer Commitment in Environmental Stewardship Programmes , 2001 .

[61]  L. Christidis,et al.  Citizens as Scientists , 2016 .

[62]  Lincoln R. Larson,et al.  Human-wildlife Conflict, Conservation Attitudes, and a Potential Role for Citizen Science in Sierra Leone, Africa , 2016 .

[63]  Mohammad Gharesifard,et al.  To share or not to share: Drivers and barriers for sharing data via online amateur weather networks , 2016 .

[64]  N. Coops,et al.  An Exploratory Assessment of a Smartphone Application for Public Participation in Forest Fuels Measurement in the Wildland-Urban Interface , 2013 .

[65]  Lammert Kooistra,et al.  What are the prospects for citizen science in agriculture? Evidence from three continents on motivation and mobile telephone use of resource-poor farmers , 2017, PloS one.

[66]  Uta Wehn de Montalvo,et al.  Mapping the Determinants of Spatial Data Sharing , 2003 .

[67]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects , 2012, CSCW.

[68]  U. Wehn,et al.  Data sharing in international transboundary contexts: The Vietnamese perspective on data sharing in the Lower Mekong Basin , 2016 .

[69]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[70]  Bethany Alender Understanding volunteer motivations to participate in citizen science projects: a deeper look at water quality monitoring , 2016 .

[71]  Adhemar Zerlotini,et al.  Single nucleotide variants and InDels identified from whole-genome re-sequencing of Guzerat, Gyr, Girolando and Holstein cattle breeds , 2017, PloS one.

[72]  R. Koss,et al.  Volunteer health and emotional wellbeing in marine protected areas , 2010 .

[73]  Glen Hart,et al.  The Scale of VGI in Map Production: A Perspective on European National Mapping Agencies , 2017, Trans. GIS.