Choice of consumer research methods in the front end of new product development

This study investigates the choice of consumer research methods in the fuzzy front end (FFE) of the new product development (NPD) process. First, it delivers an up-to-date overview of currently available consumer research methods for use in the FFE of NPD. Second, using an online questionnaire, we obtain insights into the use of these consumer research methods by B-to-C companies based in the Netherlands (N = 88, including many major multinational companies). Third, these companies provided the major reasons for choosing these methods, and specified the types of consumer information that they aim to gather using these methods. Finally, we investigate the influence of company size, type of products developed (durable/non-durable) and product newness on the use of these methods. Based on these findings, we build a contingency framework that helps companies to improve their choice of consumer research methods in the FFE, where consumer insights are most important for new product success.

[1]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Ideation for Product Innovation: What are the best methods? , 2012 .

[2]  Mariëlle E. H. Creusen Research Opportunities Related to Consumer Response to Product Design , 2011 .

[3]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  Market Information Processing in New Product Development: The Importance of Process Interdependency and Data Quality , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[4]  Ding ˜ Bang Luh The Development of Psychological Indexes for Product Design and the Concepts for Product Phases , 2010 .

[5]  Forum - Research 2.0: Engage or Give up the Ghost? , 2009 .

[6]  Pete Comley Online Research Communities - a User Guide , 2008 .

[7]  A. Griffin Obtaining Customer Needs for Product Development , 2007 .

[8]  D. Probert,et al.  Development of a Design Audit Tool for SMEs , 2007 .

[9]  Dominik Walcher,et al.  Toolkits for Idea Competitions: A Novel Method to Integrate Users in New Product Development , 2006 .

[10]  Stephen R. Rosenthal,et al.  Ethnographies in the Front End: Designing for Enhanced Customer Experiences* , 2006 .

[11]  Stefan Lagrosen,et al.  Customer involvement in new product development: A relationship marketing perspective , 2005 .

[12]  H. V. Trijp,et al.  Consumer research in the early stages of new product development: a critical review of methods and techniques , 2005 .

[13]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Finding Commercially Attractive User Innovations: A Test of Lead User Theory , 2005 .

[14]  Susan E. Reid,et al.  The Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development for Discontinuous Innovations: A Theoretical Model , 2004 .

[15]  J. Callahan,et al.  The Importance of Customer Input in the Development of Very New Products , 2004 .

[16]  Sari Kujala,et al.  User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[17]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Optimizing the Stage-Gate Process: What Best-Practice Companies Do—I , 2002 .

[18]  Anne Bruseberg,et al.  Focus groups to support the industrial/product designer: a review based on current literature and designers' feedback. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[19]  J. Hauser,et al.  The virtual customer , 2002 .

[20]  T. J. Reynolds,et al.  Laddering theory, method, analysis, and interpretation. , 2001 .

[21]  H. Kärkkäinen,et al.  Ten tools for customer-driven product development in industrial companies , 2001 .

[22]  Christian Homburg,et al.  Does Customer Interaction Enhance New Product Success , 2000 .

[23]  Steven P. Schnaars,et al.  A Survey of New Product Forecasting Practices in Industrial High Technology and Low Technology Businesses , 1999 .

[24]  Muammer Ozer,et al.  A survey of new product evaluation models , 1999 .

[25]  D. Corkindale,et al.  Co-developing products: Involving customers earlier and more deeply , 1998 .

[26]  G. O'Connor Market learning and radical innovation: A cross case comparison of eight radical innovation projects , 1998 .

[27]  Robert W. Veryzer Key factors affecting customer evaluation of discontinuous new products , 1998 .

[28]  Matti A. Kaulio Customer, consumer and user involvement in product development: A framework and a review of selected methods , 1998 .

[29]  Stephen R. Rosenthal,et al.  Towards holistic front ends in new product development , 1998 .

[30]  J. Rayport,et al.  Spark innovation through empathic design. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[31]  W. Moore,et al.  The Role of Market Information in New Product Success/Failure , 1997 .

[32]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Overhauling the new product process , 1996 .

[33]  Edwin J. Nijssen,et al.  Awareness, use and effectiveness of models and methods for new product development , 1995 .

[34]  Susan Ciccantelli,et al.  From experience: Consumer idealized design: Involving consumers in the product development process , 1993 .

[35]  J. Magidson,et al.  Consumer Idealized Design: Involving Consumers in the Product Development Process , 1993 .

[36]  Jan P L Schoormans,et al.  Consumer Research in the Development Process of Major Innovation , 1993 .

[37]  V. Mahajan,et al.  New product models: Practice, shortcomings and desired improvements , 1992 .

[38]  Philippe Cattin,et al.  Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: An Update , 1989 .

[39]  James M. Sinkula,et al.  Centralization and information acquisition by in-house market research departments , 1988 .

[40]  R. Cooper,et al.  New Products: What Separates Winners from Losers? , 1987 .

[41]  D. Littler Design and Marketing of New Products , 1981 .

[42]  P. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook , 1978 .