Control of stiffness by the medium latency electromyographic response to limb perturbation.

It is hypothesized that the medium latency electromyographic (EMG) response (ML) to limb perturbation functions to preset limb stiffness to a constant initial level. Three predictions are derived from this hypothesis: Firstly, in the presence of an instruction calling for opposition to limb perturbation, a control signal, ML, will be observed and will lead to the establishment of a constant level of limb stiffness. Secondly, in the absence of an instruction to oppose, no control signal will be observed and correspondingly a constant stiffness will not be generated. Thirdly, the latency of onset of stiffness control will covary with the latency of onset of ML. These predictions were tested in experiments involving perturbation of the human forearm about the elbow joint, with surface EMG measurements and computation of the limb stiffness function. The results are in accord with these predictions, and support the hypothesis that ML functions in the feedforward control of limb stiffness.

[1]  Hammond Ph,et al.  Involuntary activity in biceps following the sudden application of velocity to the abducted forearm. , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  P. H. Hammond,et al.  Nervous gradation of muscular contraction. , 1956, British medical bulletin.

[3]  G. Jones,et al.  Observations on the control of stepping and hopping movements in man , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  Peter H. Greene,et al.  Problems of Organization of Motor Systems , 1972 .

[5]  S. Grillner The role of muscle stiffness in meeting the changing postural and locomotor requirements for force development by the ankle extensors. , 1972, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[6]  R. Stein,et al.  The contractile properties of human motor units during voluntary isometric contractions , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  R. G. Lee,et al.  Motor Responses to Sudden Limb Displacements in Primates with Specific CNS Lesions and in Human Patients with Motor System Disorders , 1975, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[8]  J. Houk,et al.  Improvement in linearity and regulation of stiffness that results from actions of stretch reflex. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  C. Marsden,et al.  Servo action in the human thumb. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  J. Houk,et al.  Regulatory actions of human stretch reflex. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  J. Murphy,et al.  The electromyographic response to sudden stretches of limb muscles in normal human subjects. , 1978, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[12]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Effect of load disturbances during centrally initiated movements. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  J. Murphy,et al.  Cerebellar modulation of reflex gain , 1979, Progress in Neurobiology.

[14]  T. Vilis,et al.  Modulation of the functional stretch reflex by the segmental reflex pathway , 1976, Experimental Brain Research.