Provider Order Entry with Integrated Decision Support: from Academia to Industry

OBJECTIVES To describe the evolution of a provider order entry system with integrated decision support, from a research prototype to full implementation at one academic center, and finally to a commercial product. METHODS Describe the institutional environment and planning process in which the system originated. Highlight the historical evolution of the provider entry system, and analyze its system architecture and functionality. Describe the requirements for successful design and deployment both within a single health care organization and as part of a commercial product line. RESULTS Over a period of eight years the system evolved from a research prototype to a fully integrated order entry system in routine use on most inpatient units of a large academic medical center. Around 12,000 orders are entered every day into the computer system; 70% of those are entered directly by the responsible physician. The system embeds best-of-care practice guidelines, and is used to reduce resource utilization by limiting unnecessary testing and suggesting more effective or less costly therapeutic replacements. The system was recently acquired by a large HIS software vendor and is being rapidly implemented at numerous customer sites. CONCLUSIONS Large-scale development or deployment of complex health information systems requires considerable organizational agreement and resources, as well as close attention to iterative system design that explicitly includes constant feedback from the user community. The transformation of such a system from a single-site success to a widely deployed product requires convergence of resources and needs.

[1]  H. Warner,et al.  Decision support in medicine: examples from the HELP system. , 1994, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[2]  Enrico W. Coiera,et al.  Viewpoint: When Conversation Is Better Than Computation , 2000, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[3]  A R Bakker Setting the scene for the IMIA Working Group 10 working conference expanding HIS: fading boundaries. , 1995, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[4]  H L Bleich,et al.  Designing a hospital information system: a comparison of interfaced and integrated systems. , 1992, M.D. computing : computers in medical practice.

[5]  Marc Berg,et al.  Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[6]  A. Rector Clinical Terminology: Why Is it so Hard? , 1999, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[7]  Christian Lovis,et al.  Experience with an XML/HTTP-based Federative Approach to Develop a Hospital-Wide Clinical Information System , 2001, MedInfo.

[8]  Heinz Züllighoven,et al.  Techniques and Tools for Continuous User Participation , 1996 .

[9]  William W. Stead,et al.  Review: Computer-based Physician Order Entry: The State of the Art , 1994, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[10]  Nancy M. Lorenzi,et al.  Review Paper: Managing Change: An Overview , 2000, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[11]  Marc Berg,et al.  The mantra of modeling and the forgotten powers of paper: a sociotechnical view on the development of process-oriented ICT in health care , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[12]  R. T. Riley,et al.  Transforming Health Care through Information: Case Studies , 1995 .

[13]  Albert R. Bakker,et al.  Views on HIS development; recommendations of earlier working conferences compared with present challenges , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[14]  William W. Stead,et al.  Application of Technology: The Vanderbilt University Fast Track to IAIMS: Transition from Planning to Implementation , 1996, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[15]  et al.,et al.  The Regenstrief Medical Record System: a quarter century experience , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[16]  Robert H. Baud,et al.  Happy birthday DIOGENE: a hospital information system born 20 years ago , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.