Fakability of Implicit and Explicit Measures of the Big Five: Research Findings from Organizational Settings

This study investigates the extent to which response distortion occur when implicit measures of personality traits are used in applied settings. Two groups composed of 58 security guards and 45 semiskilled workers, respectively, completed five Implicit Association Tests (IATs) for assessing the Big Five personality traits as a part of a personnel assessment program. They additionally completed a self‐report measure of the same personality dimensions. Scores on the Big Five IATs and self‐ratings of personality were obtained also by 52 volunteers who responded anonymously for research purposes. Results showed that participants under evaluative testing conditions scored significantly higher than volunteers on explicit measures of agreeableness, conscientiousness, and emotional stability. On the contrary, no significant differences were found in the Big Five IATs. Practical implications of findings and future research directions are discussed.

[1]  Newell K. Eaton,et al.  Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities , 1990 .

[2]  M. Back,et al.  Validity of the Five-Factor Model for the Implicit Self-Concept of Personality , 2008 .

[3]  Russell E. Johnson,et al.  Use of Implicit Measures for Organizational Research: An Empirical Example , 2009 .

[4]  L. Hough.  Effects of Intentional Distortion in Personality Measurement and evaluation of Suggested Palliatives , 1998 .

[5]  M. Banaji,et al.  PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF THE IAT 1 RUNNING HEAD : PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF THE IAT Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test : III . Meta-analysis of Predictive Validity , 2006 .

[6]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  A multitrait-multimethod validation of the Implicit Association Test: implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs. , 2007, Experimental psychology.

[7]  Christina T. Fong,et al.  Asking about well‐being gets you half an answer: Intra‐individual processes of implicit and explicit job attitudes , 2011 .

[8]  Michael A. Olson,et al.  Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  C. Robie,et al.  The Implications of Impression Management for Personality Research in Organizations , 2004 .

[10]  K. Fiedler,et al.  Faking the IAT: Aided and Unaided Response Control on the Implicit Association Tests , 2005 .

[11]  Gernot von Collani,et al.  Measuring Big-Five personality dimensions with the implicit association test – Implicit personality traits or self-esteem? , 2007 .

[12]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  Attitudes and cognitive consistency: The role of associative and propositional processes , 2008 .

[13]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  Meta-Analyses of Fakability Estimates: Implications for Personality Measurement , 1999 .

[14]  Russell E. Johnson,et al.  We (sometimes) know not how we feel: Predicting job performance with an implicit measure of trait affectivity. , 2010 .

[15]  Michelangelo Vianello,et al.  Implicit conscientiousness predicts academic performance , 2010 .

[16]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Five-factor model of personality and employee absence , 1997 .

[18]  A. Schütz,et al.  Exaggeration is harder than understatement, but practice makes perfect! , 2011, Experimental psychology.

[19]  Gregory M. Hurtz,et al.  An Assessment of the Prevalence, Severity, and Verifiability of Entry-Level Applicant Faking Using the Randomized Response Technique , 2003 .

[20]  O. John.  The "Big Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. , 1990 .

[21]  J. Salgado.  The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Counterproductive Behaviors , 2002 .

[22]  M. Steffens.  Is the implicit association test immune to faking? , 2004, Experimental psychology.

[23]  Michael T. Brannick,et al.  A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Job Applicant Faking on Personality Measures , 2006 .

[24]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next? , 2001 .

[25]  Joseph G. Rosse,et al.  The impact of response distortion on preemployment personality testing and hiring decisions. , 1998 .

[26]  Bertram Gawronski,et al.  Handbook of implicit social cognition : measurement, theory,and applications , 2010 .

[27]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Effects of impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs. , 1996, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  S. T. Hunt,et al.  How effective are people at faking on personality questionnaires , 2002 .

[29]  M. Steffens,et al.  Predicting Spontaneous Big Five Behavior with Implicit Association Tests , 2006 .

[30]  William L. Farmer,et al.  Current Directions and Issues in Personnel Selection and Classification , 2003 .

[31]  Boris Egloff,et al.  Predictive validity of an Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  A. Furnham.  Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation , 1986 .

[33]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  C. Barbaranelli,et al.  Paper-and-Pencil and Web-Based Testing , 2012, Assessment.

[35]  Boris Egloff,et al.  Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self-concept of personality. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  Julie M. Duck,et al.  Response strategies when faking personality questionnaires in a vocational selection setting , 1995 .

[37]  C. Barbaranelli,et al.  The "big five questionnaire": A new questionnaire to assess the five factor model , 1993 .

[38]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Attitudinal Dissociation: What Does It Mean? , 2009 .

[39]  Claudio Barbaranelli,et al.  The Five Factor Model in personnel selection: Measurement equivalence between applicant and non-applicant groups , 2012 .

[40]  F. Strack,et al.  Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[41]  Boris Egloff,et al.  A Latent State-Trait Analysis of Implicit and Explicit Personality Measures , 2005 .

[42]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  What moderates implicit—explicit consistency? , 2005 .

[43]  Nathan R. Kuncel,et al.  Toward a New Method of Detecting Deliberately Faked Personality Tests: The Use of Idiosyncratic Item Responses , 2007 .

[44]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Faking of the Implicit Association Test Is Statistically Detectable and Partly Correctable , 2010 .

[45]  D. Ones,et al.  Personality Measures in Personnel Selection: Some New Contributions , 2007 .