An assessment of change in behavioral dynamics among computer‐supported groups: different factors change at different rates

Group members’ attitudes toward social processes and media properties are likely to change as members interact and gain experience with each other and technology in computer‐supported environments. Moreover, these attitudes are likely to evolve differently. This study examines computer‐supported groups of four over a series of four sessions working on a collaborative writing task. Results from this study indicate that group‐related attitudes, i.e. social perceptions, tend to change sooner, and to a greater extent, than media‐related ones. A possible explanation for these differences is that computer media have certain physical properties that cannot be easily altered by users. In contrast, group‐related structures appear to be much more malleable. These results imply that, for example, groups can, with the right assistance, develop positive group attitudes rather quickly which tend to last over time. In contrast, attitudes towards technical systems tend to evolve more slowly and, when system designs are flawed or users are not well trained on system features, managers may be faced with persistent negative user attitudes. Thus, understanding how social and technical attitudes evolve is critical for managers who want to improve group processes.

[1]  B. Aubrey Fisher,et al.  Small Group Decision Making , 1980 .

[2]  J. McGrath Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[3]  Raymond Samuel Ross,et al.  Small Groups in Organizational Settings , 1989 .

[4]  Robert Johansen TEAMS FOR TOMORROW , 1991 .

[5]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Technology: The New Media in Society , 1986 .

[6]  R. Bostrom,et al.  The impact of group support systems on group conflict and conflict management: an empirical investigation , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  Ronald Brent Gallupe,et al.  The impact of task difficulty on the use of a group decision support system , 1985 .

[8]  A. Giddens The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[9]  R. Johansen Teams for tomorrow (groupware) , 1991, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[10]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[11]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  An empirical investigation of the impact of computer support on group development and decision-making performance , 1989 .

[12]  M. S. Poole Decision development in small groups: III. A multiple sequence model of group decision development. , 1983 .

[13]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Computer-mediated communication for intellectual teamwork: a field experiment in group writing , 1990, CSCW '90.

[14]  Marshall Scott,et al.  Microlevel Structuration in Computer-Supported Group Decision Making , 1992 .

[15]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[16]  S. Seashore Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group , 1955 .

[17]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[18]  G. Hiemstra Teleconferencing, Concern for Face, and Organizational Culture , 1982 .

[19]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[20]  A. Giddens Central Problems In Social Theory , 1979 .