Comparison of different methods of spatial normalization of FDG-PET brain images in the voxel-wise analysis of MCI patients and controls

ObjectiveOne of the most interesting clinical applications of 18F-FDG PET imaging in neurodegenerative pathologies is that of establishing the prognosis of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), some of whom have a high risk of progressing to Alzheimer’s disease (AD). One method of analyzing these images is to perform statistical parametric mapping (SPM) analysis. Spatial normalization is a critical step in such an analysis. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of using different methods of spatial normalization on the results of SPM analysis of 18F-FDG PET images by comparing patients with MCI and controls.MethodsWe evaluated the results of three spatial normalization methods in an SPM analysis by comparing patients diagnosed with MCI with a group of control subjects. We tested three methods of spatial normalization: MRI-DARTEL and MRI-SPM8, which combine structural and functional images, and FDG-SPM8, which is based on the functional images only.ResultsThe results obtained with the three methods were consistent in terms of the main pattern of functional alterations detected; namely, a bilateral reduction in glucose metabolism in the frontal and parietal cortices in the patient group. However, MRI-SPM8 also revealed differences in the left temporal cortex, and MRI-DARTEL revealed further differences in the left temporal cortex, precuneus, and left posterior cingulate.ConclusionsThe results obtained with MRI-DARTEL were the most consistent with the pattern of changes in AD. When we compared our observations with those of previous reports, MRI-SPM8 and FDG-SPM8 seemed to show an incomplete pattern. Our results suggest that basing the spatial normalization method on functional images only can considerably impair the results of SPM analysis of 18F-FDG PET studies.

[1]  D. Royall,et al.  The FAB: A frontal assessment battery at bedside , 2001, Neurology.

[2]  G. Small,et al.  Positron emission tomography scans obtained for the evaluation of cognitive dysfunction. , 2008, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[3]  K. Ishii,et al.  Statistical brain mapping of 18F-FDG PET in Alzheimer's disease: validation of anatomic standardization for atrophied brains. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric mapping in functional neuroimaging: beyond PET and fMRI activation studies. , 1998, European journal of nuclear medicine.

[5]  Manuel Desco,et al.  Influence of the normalization template on the outcome of statistical parametric mapping of PET scans , 2003, NeuroImage.

[6]  P. S. Mathuranath,et al.  A brief cognitive test battery to differentiate Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia , 2000, Neurology.

[7]  E. Tangalos,et al.  Mild Cognitive Impairment Clinical Characterization and Outcome , 1999 .

[8]  P. Osterrieth.  Le test de copie d'une figure complexe , 1944 .

[9]  C. P. Hughes,et al.  A New Clinical Scale for the Staging of Dementia , 1982, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[10]  A. Rey.  Lexamen psychologique : Dans les cas d'encephalopathie traumatique (Les problemes) , 1941 .

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Voxel-Based Morphometry , 2015 .

[12]  Hiroshi Matsuda,et al.  Role of Neuroimaging in Alzheimer's Disease, with Emphasis on Brain Perfusion SPECT* , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  M. Aguilar,et al.  Clinical validity of the ‘mini-mental state’ for Spanish speaking communities , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[15]  Cindee M. Madison,et al.  Associations between cognitive, functional, and FDG-PET measures of decline in AD and MCI , 2011, Neurobiology of Aging.

[16]  Karl Herholz,et al.  PET studies in dementia , 2003, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[17]  A. Rey.  L'examen psychologique dans les cas d'encéphalopathie traumatique. (Les problems.). , 1941 .

[18]  Eric Salmon,et al.  Metabolic correlates of clinical heterogeneity in questionable Alzheimer's disease , 2008, Neurobiology of Aging.

[19]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  “Voxel-Based Morphometry” Should Not Be Used with Imperfectly Registered Images , 2001, NeuroImage.

[20]  G. Small.  Positron emission tomography imaging of dementia , 2000, Dialogues in clinical neuroscience.

[21]  E. Reiman,et al.  Multicenter Standardized 18F-FDG PET Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer's Disease, and Other Dementias , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  J. Baños,et al.  California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition , 2002 .

[23]  Ron Dumont,et al.  California Verbal Learning Test, Second Edition , 2014 .

[24]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[25]  C. Jack,et al.  Mild cognitive impairment: ten years later. , 2009, Archives of neurology.

[26]  John Ashburner,et al.  A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm , 2007, NeuroImage.

[27]  C. Jack,et al.  Mild cognitive impairment – beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2004, Journal of internal medicine.

[28]  Juan Sanchez-Gonzalez,et al.  Impact of ventricular enlargement on the measurement of metabolic activity in spatially normalized PET , 2007, NeuroImage.