Testing the Connectivity Paradox: Linking Teleworkers' Communication Media Use to Social Presence, Stress from Interruptions, and Organizational Identification

Scholars emphasize the importance of rich communication media for the development of Teleworkers' organizational identification, but tests of these relationships have produced inconsistent results. The connectivity paradox helps explain these findings. The paradox suggests that Teleworkers' connectivity to others through communication media facilitates remote work by affording greater social presence, while also negating the benefits of telework by enabling stressful interruptions. These outcomes of connectivity may benefit and detract from identification. We propose a model linking the core features of the connectivity paradox to organizational identification. Teleworkers and office workers were surveyed, and a multigroup path analysis was utilized. Results indicate that connectivity increases stress from interruptions and indirectly diminishes Teleworkers' identification.

[1]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  THE USE AND ABUSE OF FACTOR ANALYSIS IN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH , 1979 .

[2]  C. Stohl,et al.  Participatory Processes/Paradoxical Practices , 2001 .

[3]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[4]  C. Marlene Fiol,et al.  Identification in Face-to-Face, Hybrid, and Pure Virtual Teams: Untangling the Contradictions , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[5]  Craig R. Scott,et al.  Communication and Social Identity Theory: Existing and Potential Connections in Organizational Identification Research , 2007 .

[6]  T. Golden.  Co-workers who telework and the impact on those in the office: Understanding the implications of virtual work for co-worker satisfaction and turnover intentions , 2007 .

[7]  Nancy B. Kurland,et al.  A review of telework research: findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work , 2002 .

[8]  Sharmila Pixy Ferris,et al.  Virtual and Collaborative Teams: Process, Technologies, and Practice , 2004 .

[9]  Y. Baruch.  Teleworking: benefits and pitfalls as perceived by professionals and managers , 2000 .

[10]  C. Gunawardena.  Social Presence Theory and Implications for Interaction and Collaborative Learning in Computer Conferences , 1995 .

[11]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[12]  Richard W. Monroe,et al.  Telecommuting's past and future: a literature review and research agenda , 2006, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[13]  James E. Hunton,et al.  Behavioral Self-Regulation of Telework Locations: Interrupting Interruptions! , 2005, J. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Structural equation modeling with AMOS , 2010 .

[15]  S. Raghuram,et al.  Communication Patterns As Determinants of Organizational Identification in a Virtual Organization , 1999 .

[16]  K. Cameron,et al.  Paradox and transformation : toward a theory of change in organization and management , 1990 .

[17]  Sumita Raghuram,et al.  Organizational identification among virtual workers: the role of need for affiliation and perceived work-based social support , 2001 .

[18]  Leslie A Perlow,et al.  Making time off predictable--and required. , 2009, Harvard business review.

[19]  George Cheney,et al.  On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification , 1983 .

[20]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  The Place of Face-to-Face Communication in Distributed Work , 2002 .

[21]  Sumita Raghuram,et al.  Work-nonwork conflict and job stress among virtual workers , 2004 .

[22]  Kathryn L. Fonner,et al.  Why Teleworkers are More Satisfied with Their Jobs than are Office-Based Workers: When Less Contact is Beneficial , 2010 .

[23]  K BurgoonJudee,et al.  Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence , 2003 .

[24]  Norah E. Dunbar,et al.  Testing the Interactivity Principle: Effects of Mediation, Propinquity, and Verbal and Nonverbal Modalities in Interpersonal Interaction , 2002 .

[25]  Y. Baruch.  The status of research on teleworking and an agenda for future research , 2001 .

[26]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  Why workers still identify with organizations , 1998 .

[27]  Bonnie A. Nardi and Steve Whittaker.  The Place of Face-to-Face Communication in Distributed Work , 2002 .

[28]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[29]  Dawna I. Ballard,et al.  Alternative Times: Temporal Perceptions, Processes, and Practices Defining the Nonstandard Work Relationship , 2007 .

[30]  B. Byrne.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[31]  Loril M. Gossett,et al.  Kept at arm's length: questioning the organizational desirability of member identification , 2002 .

[32]  Wolfgang W. Osterhage,et al.  IT Quality Management , 2015, HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[33]  A. Luong,et al.  Meetings and More Meetings: The Relationship Between Meeting Load and the Daily Well-Being of Employees. , 2005 .

[34]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification , 1992 .

[35]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories , 1989 .

[36]  Steven R. Corman,et al.  Development of a Structurational Model of Identification in the Organization , 1998 .

[37]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Communication Patterns as Determinants of Organizational Identification in a Virtual Organization , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[38]  Carol Saunders,et al.  There's no place like home: Managing telecommuting paradoxes , 2001 .

[39]  Stacey L. Connaughton,et al.  Identification with leader , 2004 .

[40]  C. Gunawardena,et al.  Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment , 1997 .

[41]  C. Erik Timmerman,et al.  Communication technology use and multiple workplace identifications among organizational teleworkers with varied degrees of virtuality , 1999 .

[42]  E. Hill,et al.  Influences of The Virtual Office on Aspects of Work and Work/Life Balance , 1998 .

[43]  J. George,et al.  Work Interrupted: A Closer Look at the Role of Interruptions in Organizational Life , 2003 .

[44]  Sherry M. B. Thatcher,et al.  SUBJECTIVE IDENTITIES AND IDENTITY COMMUNICATION PROCESSES IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TEAMS , 2003 .

[45]  Artemio Ramirez, Jr,et al.  When Online Meets Offline: The Effect of Modality Switching on Relational Communication , 2007 .

[46]  K. Cameron,et al.  Organizational paradox and transformation. , 1988 .

[47]  Xiumei Zhu,et al.  Changing Identities in a Changing Workplace: Identification, Identity Enactment, Self-Verification, and Telecommuting , 2006 .

[48]  Leslie A. Perlow,et al.  Who's helping whom? Layers of culture and workplace behavior , 2002 .

[49]  Nancy B. Kurland,et al.  Telecommuting, professional isolation, and employee development in public and private organizations , 2002 .

[50]  Michele H. Jackson,et al.  The Strategic Use of "Distance" Among Virtual Team Members: A Multidimensional Communication Model , 2004 .

[51]  E. Kossek,et al.  Work–family conflict, policies, and the job–life satisfaction relationship: A review and directions for organizational behavior–human resources research. , 1998 .

[52]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions , 2008 .

[53]  Diane M. Martin.  Humor in middle management: women negotiating the paradoxes of organizational life , 2004 .

[54]  H. Tajfel.  Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. , 1978 .

[55]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  Media selection and identification in distributed groups the potential costs of “Rich” Media , 2000 .

[56]  D. Harrison,et al.  The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[57]  Frank Biocca,et al.  Toward a More Robust Theory and Measure of Social Presence: Review and Suggested Criteria , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[58]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Quality of management by objectives, task-related stressors, and non-task-related stressors as predictors of stress and job satisfaction among teleworkers , 2003 .

[59]  C. Erik Timmerman,et al.  Virtually Working: Communicative and Structural Predictors of Media Use and Key Outcomes in Virtual Work Teams , 2006 .

[60]  Michele H. Jackson,et al.  The Connectivity Paradox: Using Technology to Both Decrease and Increase Perceptions of Distance in Distributed Work Arrangements , 2010 .

[61]  Jack M. Richman,et al.  Information adequacy, job satisfaction and organizational culture in a dispersed‐network organization , 2004 .

[62]  Jean Wilson,et al.  Perceived Proximity in Virtual Work: Explaining the Paradox of Far-but-Close , 2008 .

[63]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions , 1999 .