A non-structural fuzzy decision method developed for organic Rankine cycles used in liquid-dominated geothermal fields of medium/high temperature

Abstract A reliable decision-making method is of great importance for the designing of a practical and efficient organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system employed to exploit geothermal energy. This paper develops a three-level non-structural fuzzy decision algorithm for the comprehensive evaluation of a geo-fluid driven trans-critical ORC (TORC) system on the basis of a progressive system performance hierarchy, involving environmental characteristics, safety, thermodynamic and techno-economic performance. Two representative geothermal reservoirs with medium (GR-I) and high (GR-II) temperature are investigated to realize and validate the proposed method. Four mathematical models and six working fluids with thirteen indexes are developed to fulfill the performance evaluation and decision-making courses. Parametric analysis results of the decision criteria are conducted including specific net out power ( A P net ), thermal efficiency ( η t ), exergy efficiency ( η e ), heat transfer area per net output power (APR) and electricity production cost (EPC), and the different performance of TORC for GR-I and GR-II are fully revealed. As for the GR-I, the result of the three-level fuzzy decision ranking order is R142b, R134a, R290, R1270, R227ea and R143a. In regard to the GR-II, it’s R142b, R1270, R134a, R290, R227ea and R143a. Both show that R142b performs best. In the GR-I and GR-II, R142b obtains the maximal A P net of 110.94 kW/(kg·s−1) and 198.14 kW/(kg·s−1), the maximal η t of 14.05% and 14.43%, the maximal η e of 51.42% and 42.90%, the minimal APR of 0.262(m2/kW) and 0.185(m2/kW), the minimal EPC of 0.030($/(kW·h)) and 0.022($/(kW·h)). Summarily, this three-level fuzzy decision evaluation method can provide important guidance and decisive solution by concisely display the pros and cons for each ORC scheme of geothermal resource utilization.

[1]  Dieter Brüggemann,et al.  Life cycle assessment of Organic Rankine Cycles for geothermal power generation considering low-GWP working fluids , 2016 .

[2]  Tsing-Fa Lin,et al.  Condensation heat transfer and pressure drop of refrigerant R-410A flow in a vertical plate heat exchanger , 2005 .

[3]  W. Feng,et al.  Effect factors of part-load performance for various Organic Rankine cycles using in engine waste heat recovery , 2018, Energy Conversion and Management.

[4]  B. Rezaie,et al.  Geothermal technology: Trends and potential role in a sustainable future , 2019, Applied Energy.

[5]  Xiaoya Li,et al.  Integrating off-design performance in designing CO2 power cycle systems for engine waste heat recovery , 2019, Energy Conversion and Management.

[6]  Andrea Lazzaretto,et al.  Influence of axial turbine efficiency maps on the performance of subcritical and supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle systems , 2016 .

[7]  Igor Pioro,et al.  Heat transfer to supercritical fluids flowing in channels—empirical correlations (survey) , 2004 .

[8]  Jidong Lu,et al.  Investigation of a refrigeration system based on combined supercritical CO2 power and transcritical CO2 refrigeration cycles by waste heat recovery of engine , 2020, International Journal of Refrigeration.

[9]  Chun-wei Gu,et al.  Parametric design and off-design analysis of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system , 2016 .

[10]  A. Manzella,et al.  Geothermal energy in deep aquifers: A global assessment of the resource base for direct heat utilization , 2018 .

[11]  D. Goswami,et al.  Working fluid parametric analysis for recuperative supercritical organic Rankine cycles for medium geothermal reservoir temperatures , 2020 .

[12]  Muhammad Usman,et al.  Comparative assessment of Organic Rankine Cycle integration for low temperature geothermal heat source applications , 2016 .

[13]  Shukun Wang,et al.  Thermo-economic comparison of subcritical organic Rankine cycle based on different heat exchanger configurations , 2017 .

[14]  Zhong-Zheng Wang,et al.  Analysis of Performance of Steam Condensation Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop in Plate Condensers , 1993 .

[15]  Guo-Yan Zhou,et al.  Optimum selection of compact heat exchangers using non-structural fuzzy decision method , 2014 .

[16]  K. Hooman,et al.  Multi-objective analysis of an influence of a geothermal water salinity on optimal operating parameters in low-temperature ORC power plant , 2020 .

[17]  Y. Duan,et al.  Effects of evaporator pinch point temperature difference on thermo-economic performance of geothermal organic Rankine cycle systems , 2018, Geothermics.

[18]  Hikari Fujii,et al.  Thermo-economic evaluation of various bottoming ORCs for geothermal power plant, determination of optimum cycle for Sabalan power plant exhaust , 2017 .

[19]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  Binary ORC (Organic Rankine Cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium–low temperature geothermal sources – Part B: Techno-economic optimization , 2014 .

[20]  Z. Ji,et al.  Performance analyses of regenerative organic flash cycles for geothermal power generation , 2020 .

[21]  W. Worek,et al.  Optimum design criteria for an Organic Rankine cycle using low-temperature geothermal heat sources , 2007 .

[22]  Duygu Melek Cakici,et al.  Thermodynamic performance assessment of an integrated geothermal powered supercritical regenerative organic Rankine cycle and parabolic trough solar collectors , 2017 .

[23]  Jiansheng Wang,et al.  Optimization on pinch point temperature difference of ORC system based on AHP-Entropy method , 2017 .

[24]  C. Romero,et al.  Working fluid selection for organic Rankine cycle power generation using hot produced supercritical CO2 from a geothermal reservoir , 2019, Applied Thermal Engineering.

[25]  Christian Vetter,et al.  Comparison of sub- and supercritical Organic Rankine Cycles for power generation from low-temperature/low-enthalpy geothermal wells, considering specific net power output and efficiency , 2013 .

[26]  H. Martin A theoretical approach to predict the performance of chevron-type plate heat exchangers , 1996 .