Alternative Models of Dynamics in Binary Time-Series-Cross-Section Models: The Example of State Failure 1

This paper investigates a variety of dynamic probit models for time-series– cross-section data in the context of explaining state failure. It shows that ordinary probit, which ignores dynamics, is misleading. Alternatives that seem to produce sensible results are the transition model and a model which includes a lagged latent dependent variable. It is argued that the use of a lagged latent variable is often superior to the use of a lagged realized dependent variable. It is also shown that the latter is a special case of the transition model. The relationship between the transition model and event history methods is also considered: the transition model estimates an event history model for both values of the dependent variable, yielding estimates that are identical to those produced by the two event history models. Furthermore, one can incorporate the insights gleaned from the event history models into the transition analysis, so that researchers do not have to assume duration independence. The conclusion notes that investigations of the various models have been limited to data sets which contain long sequences of zeros; models may perform differently in data sets with shorter bursts of zeros and ones.

[1]  H. Guitton,et al.  Distributed Lags and Investment Analysis , 1955 .

[2]  P. J. Huber The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions , 1967 .

[3]  A. Trognon,et al.  Estimation and test in probit models with serial correlation , 1982 .

[4]  Wagner A. Kamakura,et al.  Book Review: Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications , 1982 .

[5]  J. Kadane Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications , 1984 .

[6]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[7]  Paul A. Ruud,et al.  Probit with Dependent Observations , 1988 .

[8]  J. Ware,et al.  Issues in the analysis of repeated categorical outcomes. , 1988, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  K. T. Poole,et al.  Poverty, the Coup Trap, and the Seizure of Executive Power , 1990, World Politics.

[10]  Nathaniel Beck,et al.  Comparing Dynamic Specifications: The Case of Presidential Approval , 1991, Political Analysis.

[11]  John Geweke,et al.  Statistical inference in the multinomial multiperiod probit model , 1997 .

[12]  Ted Robert Gurr,et al.  Transitions to Democracy: Tracking Democracy''s Third Wave with the Polity III Data , 1996 .

[13]  J. Goldstone,et al.  Working Papers: State Failure Task Force Report , 1995 .

[14]  P. Diggle Analysis of Longitudinal Data , 1995 .

[15]  Nathaniel Beck,et al.  The Analysis of Binary Time-Series–Cross-Section Data and/or The Democratic Peace , 1998 .

[16]  Nathaniel Beck,et al.  Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable , 1998 .

[17]  Nathaniel Beck,et al.  Throwing Out the Baby with the Bath Water: A Comment on Green, Yoon and Kim , 2000 .

[18]  S. Jackman In and Out of War and Peace: Transitional Models of International Conflict , 2000 .

[19]  Simon Jackman,et al.  Estimation and Inference via Bayesian Simulation: An Introduction to Markov Chain Monte Carlo , 2000 .

[20]  Christopher Zorn Generalized Estimating Equation Models for Correlated Data: A Review with Applications , 2001 .

[21]  Nathaniel Beck,et al.  Throwing Out the Baby with the Bath Water: A Comment on Green, Kim, and Yoon , 2001, International Organization.

[22]  Gary King,et al.  Improving Forecasts of State Failure , 2001 .

[23]  David Stark,et al.  Distributing Intelligence and Organizing Diversity in New-Media Projects , 2002 .

[24]  D.,et al.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 2022 .