Dynamic Models for Intention (Goal-Directedness) Are Required by Truly Intelligent Robots

Intelligent behavior is characterized by flexible and creative pursuit of endogenously defined goals. Intentionality is a key concept by which to link brain dynamics to goal-directed behavior, and to design mechanisms for intentional adaptations by machines. Evidence from vertebrate brain evolution and clinical neurology points to the limbic system as the key forebrain structure that creates the neural activity which formulate goals as images of desired future states. The behavior patterns created by the mesoscopic dynamics of the forebrain take the form of hypothesis testing. Predicted information is sought by use of sense organs. Synaptic connectivity of the brain changes by learning from the consequences of actions taken. Software and hardware systems using coupled nonlinear differential equations with chaotic attractor landscapes simulate these functions in free-roving machines learning to operate in unstructured environments.

[1]  W. Freeman Societies of Brains: A Study in the Neuroscience of Love and Hate. By W. J. Freeman. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ. 1994. , 1997, Psychological Medicine.

[2]  Walter J. Freeman,et al.  Origin, structure, and role of background EEG activity. Part 3. Neural frame classification , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  Robert Kozma,et al.  Chaotic Resonance - Methods and Applications for Robust Classification of noisy and Variable Patterns , 2001, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[4]  I. Tsuda Toward an interpretation of dynamic neural activity in terms of chaotic dynamical systems. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[5]  Péter Érdi,et al.  The KIV model - nonlinear spatio-temporal dynamics of the primordial vertebrate forebrain , 2003, Neurocomputing.

[6]  W Singer,et al.  Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  Elizabeth C. Crosly,et al.  The Brain of the Tiger Salamander. , 1949 .

[8]  Walter J. Freeman,et al.  A Neurobiological Theory of Meaning in Perception Part I: Information and Meaning in Nonconvergent and Nonlocal Brain Dynamics , 2003, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[9]  W. Freeman,et al.  How brains make chaos in order to make sense of the world , 1987, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[10]  Walter J. Freeman,et al.  Characteristics of the Synchronization of Brain Activity imposed by Finite conduction Velocities of axons , 2000, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[11]  W. Freeman,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of prepyriform, visual, auditory, and somesthetic surface EEGs in trained rabbits. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  W. Freeman,et al.  Taming chaos: stabilization of aperiodic attractors by noise [olfactory system model] , 1997 .

[13]  Donald O. Walter,et al.  Mass action in the nervous system , 1975 .