Use of mini implants for replacement and immediate loading of 2 single-tooth restorations: a clinical case report.

Numerous long-term studies have shown that treatment with dental implants can provide edentulous patients with a more stable alternative to complete dentures and partially edentulous patients with a more conservative form of tooth replacement than conventional fixed partial dentures. Until recently, commercially available dental implants have been limited to diameters ranging from 3.0 mm to 7.0 mm. Although this range of diameters has been able to address most clinical needs, partially edentulous patients who could not accommodate a 3.0-mm-diameter implant without damaging adjacent dental structures were excluded from implant therapy. This article reports on the surgical treatment and immediate restoration of a patient who received mini implants that were 2.4 mm in diameter.

[1]  Robert F Wright,et al.  Effect of implant size and shape on implant success rates: a literature review. , 2005, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[2]  K. Rossein Retaining and stabilizing dentures with narrow-bodied implants. , 2005, Dentistry today.

[3]  M. Klingensmith,et al.  Patient Selection and Preparation , 2004 .

[4]  C. Misch,et al.  Rationale for the application of immediate load in implant dentistry: Part I. , 2004, Implant dentistry.

[5]  D. Kawahara,et al.  Osseointegration under Immediate Loading: Biomechanical Stress–Strain and Bone Formation–Resorption , 2003, Implant dentistry.

[6]  A. Caputo,et al.  Removal torque of immediately loaded transitional endosseous implants in human subjects. , 2002, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[7]  Thomas D Taylor,et al.  Twenty years of progress in implant prosthodontics. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  W. Shankland,et al.  Alternative to the inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia when placing mandibular dental implants posterior to the mental foramen. , 2001, The Journal of oral implantology.

[9]  J W Gibney,et al.  Minimally invasive implant surgery. , 2001, The Journal of oral implantology.

[10]  D E Steflik,et al.  Mini-dental implant insertion with the auto-advance technique for ongoing applications. , 2001, The Journal of oral implantology.

[11]  J B Brunski,et al.  Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: current status and future developments. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[12]  M. el attar,et al.  Study of the effect of using mini-transitional implants as temporary abutments in implant overdenture cases. , 1999, Implant dentistry.

[13]  S. Nagaoka,et al.  The efficacy of modular transitional implants placed simultaneously with implant fixtures. , 1999, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[14]  S. Szmukler‐Moncler,et al.  Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[15]  M. Block,et al.  The effect of diameter and length of hydroxylapatite-coated dental implants on ultimate pullout force in dog alveolar bone. , 1990, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[16]  Lily T. Garcia,et al.  Osseointegration and Occlusal Rehabilitation , 1989 .

[17]  S Avera,et al.  The restoration of improperly inclined osseointegrated implants. , 1989, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[18]  P. Branemark Osseointegration and its experimental background. , 1983, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[19]  P I Brånemark,et al.  A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. , 1981, International journal of oral surgery.