The impact of letter spacing on reading: a test of the bigram coding hypothesis.

Identifying letters and their relative positions is the basis of reading in literate adults. The Local Combinations Detector model hypothesizes that this ability results from the general organization of the visual system, whereby object encoding proceeds through a hierarchy of neural detectors that, in the case of reading, would be tuned to letters, bigrams, or other letter combinations. Given the increase of receptive fields by a factor of 2 to 3 from one neural level to the next, detectors should integrate information only for letters separated by at most 2 other characters. We test this prediction by measuring the impact of letter spacing on reading, purifying this effect from confounding variables. We establish that performance deteriorates non-linearly whenever letters are separated by at least 2 blank spaces, with the concomitant emergence of a word length effect. We then show that this cannot be reduced to an effect of physical size nor of visual eccentricity. Finally, we demonstrate that the threshold of about 2 spaces is constant across variations in font size. Those results support the hypothesis that the fast recognition of combinations of nearby letters plays a central role in the coding of words, such that interfering with this representation prevents the parallel analysis of letter strings.

[1]  S Lehéricy,et al.  The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  S. Dehaene,et al.  How Learning to Read Changes the Cortical Networks for Vision and Language , 2010, Science.

[3]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Length, formats, neighbours, hemispheres, and the processing of words presented laterally or at fixation , 2004, Brain and Language.

[5]  Jeffrey S Bowers,et al.  Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: evidence from orthographic similarity effects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  C. Whitney.  How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  J. Grainger,et al.  Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters , 2004 .

[8]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Short article: Eye movements when reading text messaging (txt msgng) , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  Letter legibility and visual word recognition , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[10]  T. Nazir,et al.  Developing normal reading skills: aspects of the visual processes underlying word recognition. , 2000, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[11]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  An ERP investigation of orthographic priming with relative-position and absolute-position primes , 2009, Brain Research.

[12]  Valérie Hahn-Barma,et al.  What and Where in Word Reading: Ventral Coding of Written Words Revealed by Parietal Atrophy , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  Michal Lavidor,et al.  Why word length only matters in the left visual field , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  R. Vogels,et al.  Spatial sensitivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons , 2000, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  Daniel N. Bub,et al.  Different modes of word recognition in the left and right visual fields , 1988, Brain and Language.

[16]  J. Grainger,et al.  Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  M. Sigman,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.9 No.7 July 2005 The neural code for written words: a proposal , 2022 .

[18]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[19]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Reading normal and degraded words: Contribution of the dorsal and ventral visual pathways , 2008, NeuroImage.

[20]  B. Weekes.  Differential Effects of Number of Letters on Word and Nonword Naming Latency , 1997 .

[21]  E. Rolls.  Functions of the Primate Temporal Lobe Cortical Visual Areas in Invariant Visual Object and Face Recognition , 2000, Neuron.

[22]  J B Poline,et al.  Letter Binding and Invariant Recognition of Masked Words , 2004, Psychological science.

[23]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision , 2001, Vision Research.

[24]  Jeffrey R. Binder,et al.  Tuning of the human left fusiform gyrus to sublexical orthographic structure , 2006, NeuroImage.

[25]  J Grainger,et al.  The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—XVI. The visual span in normal and low vision , 1997, Vision Research.

[27]  Philip T Quinlan,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word identification , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Eccentricity Bias as an Organizing Principle for Human High-Order Object Areas , 2002, Neuron.

[29]  Mariano Sigman,et al.  Hierarchical Coding of Letter Strings in the Ventral Stream: Dissecting the Inner Organization of the Visual Word-Form System , 2007, Neuron.

[30]  Michal Lavidor.  An Examination of the Lateralized Abstractive/Form Specific Model Using MiXeD-CaSe Primes , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[31]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Direct Intracranial, fMRI, and Lesion Evidence for the Causal Role of Left Inferotemporal Cortex in Reading , 2006, Neuron.

[32]  R. Holloway.  The broth in my brother ’ s brothel : Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition , 2005 .

[33]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Graded size sensitivity of object-exemplar-evoked activity patterns within human LOC subregions. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  K Rayner,et al.  Reading without a fovea. , 1979, Science.

[35]  Cristina Burani,et al.  Morpheme-based reading aloud: Evidence from dyslexic and skilled Italian readers , 2008, Cognition.

[36]  Thomas Serre,et al.  A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Marcin Szwed,et al.  Unconsciously deciphering handwriting: Subliminal invariance for handwritten words in the visual word form area , 2010, NeuroImage.

[38]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Ventral and dorsal contributions to word reading. , 2009 .

[39]  J. Segui,et al.  Morphological priming without morphological relationship , 2003 .

[40]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Lexique 2 : A new French lexical database , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[42]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Word Length and Orthographic Neighborhood Size Effects in the Left and Right Cerebral Hemispheres , 2002, Brain and Language.

[43]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[44]  Boris New,et al.  Syllabic length effects in visual word recognition and naming. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[45]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.