When is P2P Technology Beneficial for IPTV Services

This paper studies the conditions under which peer-to-peer (P2P) technology may be beneficial in providing IPTV services over typical network architectures. It has two major contributions. First, we contrast two network models used to study the performance of such a system: a commonly used logical “Internet as a cloud” model and a “physical” model that reflects the characteristics of the underlying network. Specifically, we show that the cloud model overlooks important architectural aspects of the network and may drastically overstate the benefits of P2P technology by a factor of 3 or more. Second, we provide a cost-benefit analysis of P2P video content delivery focusing on the profit trade-offs for different pricing/incentive models rather than purely on capacity maximization. In particular, we find that under high volume of video demand, a P2P built-in incentive model performs better than any other model for both high-definition and standard-definition media, while the usage-based model generally generates more profits when the request rate is low. The flat-reward model generally falls in-between the usagebased model and the built-in model in terms of prof itability.

[1]  Virgílio A. F. Almeida,et al.  A hierarchical characterization of a live streaming media workload , 2006 .

[2]  Kien A. Hua,et al.  A peer-to-peer architecture for media streaming , 2004, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[3]  Bobby Bhattacharjee,et al.  Scalable application layer multicast , 2002, SIGCOMM '02.

[4]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  A peer-to-peer on-demand streaming service and its performance evaluation , 2003, 2003 International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. ICME '03. Proceedings (Cat. No.03TH8698).

[5]  Helen J. Wang,et al.  Distributing streaming media content using cooperative networking , 2002, NOSSDAV '02.

[6]  Hector Garcia-Molina,et al.  Transience of peers & streaming media , 2003, CCRV.

[7]  Rittwik Jana,et al.  Capacity analysis of MediaGrid: a P2P IPTV platform for fiber to the node (FTTN) networks , 2007, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[8]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  P2Cast: peer-to-peer patching scheme for VoD service , 2003, WWW '03.

[9]  Kien A. Hua,et al.  Chaining: a generalized batching technique for video-on-demand systems , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems.

[10]  Catherine Rosenberg,et al.  Analysis of a CDN–P2P hybrid architecture for cost-effective streaming media distribution , 2006, Multimedia Systems.

[11]  Stefan Saroiu,et al.  A Measurement Study of Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Systems , 2001 .

[12]  Hector Garcia-Molina,et al.  Streaming Live Media over a Peer-to-Peer Network , 2001 .

[13]  Virgílio A. F. Almeida,et al.  A hierarchical characterization of a live streaming media workload , 2006, TNET.

[14]  Yunhao Liu,et al.  AnySee: Peer-to-Peer Live Streaming , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[15]  William Chan,et al.  Improving Traffic Locality in BitTorrent via Biased Neighbor Selection , 2006, 26th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS'06).

[16]  Rakesh Kumar,et al.  Optimal peer selection for P2P downloading and streaming , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[17]  Bharat K. Bhargava,et al.  Cost-Profit Analysis of a Peer-to-Peer Media Streaming Architecture , 2003 .

[18]  Jim Kurose,et al.  Cast : P 2 P Patching Scheme for VoD Service , 2002 .