Analysis of energy savings of three daylight control systems in a school building by means of monitoring

Abstract Daylight control systems, which automatically adjust the artificial light levels depending on the daylight penetration, can result in substantial energy savings. However, their energy saving potential cannot be estimated accurately because it depends on several building and system parameters, climate conditions, occupant behaviour and type and commissioning of the daylight control system. The objective of this paper is to compare the energy saving potential and operation of different daylight control systems in school buildings. One year monitoring has been carried out simultaneously in 3 neighbouring classrooms, equipped with a different type of control system. The active power and the electric energy consumption of the artificial lighting were measured continuously on a minute-by-minute basis, as well as the occupancy of the classrooms and the global irradiance outside the building under an unobstructed horizon. Momentary visual comfort assessments were carried out in the classrooms. Although all classrooms have comparable occupancy and identical building characteristics, differences between the annual energy savings of the different daylight control systems are found to be significant: the total annual energy savings varied from 18% to 46%. Under the given conditions, the open loop system with the outward facing daylight sensor was noticed to yield the largest while the closed loop system with centrally positioned sensor produced the smallest savings. However, it has to be made sure that the energy savings are not at the expense of the visual comfort. The performance of the systems regarding both energy savings and visual comfort is related to the operation and the initial commissioning. An in-depth analysis of the monitoring campaign is discussed to explain the differences in energy savings and visual comfort. The energy savings due to the implementation of a daylight control system are divided into on the one hand dimming due to daylight penetration and on the other hand initial dimming to compensate for the over dimensioning of the lighting system and to take into account constant illuminance control.

[1]  Jeong Tai Kim,et al.  Effects of occupancy and lighting use patterns on lighting energy consumption , 2012 .

[2]  Danny H.W. Li,et al.  An analysis of energy-efficient light fittings and lighting controls , 2010 .

[3]  Eric Wai Ming Lee,et al.  Study of daylight data and lighting energy savings for atrium corridors with lighting dimming controls , 2014 .

[4]  Mohammad Yusri Hassan,et al.  A review on lighting control technologies in commercial buildings, their performance and affecting factors , 2014 .

[5]  Magali Bodart,et al.  Global energy savings in offices buildings by the use of daylighting , 2002 .

[6]  Danny H.W. Li,et al.  Lighting and energy performance for an office using high frequency dimming controls , 2006 .

[7]  M. Atif,et al.  Energy performance of daylight-linked automatic lighting control systems in large atrium spaces: report on two field-monitored case studies , 2003 .

[8]  Magali Bodart,et al.  Lighting energy savings in offices using different control systems and their real consumption , 2008 .

[9]  Danny H.W. Li,et al.  Evaluation of lighting performance in office buildings with daylighting controls , 2001 .

[10]  Moncef Krarti,et al.  Energy Audit of Building Systems : An Engineering Approach , 2000 .

[11]  Wouter Ryckaert,et al.  Criteria for energy efficient lighting in buildings , 2010 .

[12]  In-Ho Yang,et al.  Economic analysis of the daylight-linked lighting control system in office buildings , 2010 .

[13]  Francis Rubinstein,et al.  Comparison of control options in private offices in an advanced lighting controls testbed , 1999 .

[14]  Jean-Louis Scartezzini,et al.  Daylight in Buildings - A source book on daylighting systems and components , 2000 .

[15]  Chiara Aghemo,et al.  Building automation and control systems: A case study to evaluate the energy and environmental performances of a lighting control system in offices , 2014 .